• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Arnold Murray's Teaching

Nov 16, 2009
3,039
134
Kentucky
✟27,610.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Food for thought.........


satan, the serpent was transformed from a glorious angel into a vile creature right?

I don't buy into UFO, alien, superior intelligence stuff, but perhaps the description of satan in the garden was a reference to his reptilian/alien appearance, and perhaps Eve did lay with him.

We can't possibly fully understand what exactly transpired those 6000 years ago, but we can grasp the fact that she and Adam disobeyed, and were thus enlightened by satan the great illuminator of humanity.

Was Cain the offspring of satan? IDK.
Will we be grafted into the Elohim after the millenial reign of our Master and King? IDK.

But what I do know is that Pastor Murray, and his Shepherd's Chapel have led me to a closer relationship with our Majesty, and for that he can not be judged.

People nitpick every popular teacher's every word, and we can't do that. The Lord enlightens whom He chooses, and NO MAN knows the whole of the picture being painted behind him.
Pastor Murray teaches the Gospel as does Pastor John Hagee as does Pastor Jack Van Impe. I take from each what the Lord shows me as 100% Gospel TRUTH, and when I take something that doesn't taste right, I spit it out. Sometimes I study it, review it until I understand it better, but if it still not the meat or the milk, don't eat it. Period.
Our Master, our King, our Rabbi is coming soon. He will teach us the TRUTH that is in everything good thing, and eliminate the lies of evil.

Praise and exalt Him above all forever!
 
Upvote 0

NightHawkeye

Work-in-progress
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2010
45,814
10,318
✟826,037.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Hi Charles, :wave:

Our Master, our King, our Rabbi is coming soon. He will teach us the TRUTH that is in everything good thing, and eliminate the lies of evil.

Praise and exalt Him above all forever!
Just one minor clarification, Charles ...
Ezekiel 44:23 And they shall teach my people the difference between the holy and profane, and cause them to discern between the unclean and the clean.
24 And in controversy they shall stand in judgment; and they shall judge it according to my judgments: and they shall keep my laws and my statutes in all mine assemblies; and they shall hallow my sabbaths.

Rev 1:6 And hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father; to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.

Rev 5:10 And hast made us unto our God kings and priests: and we shall reign on the earth.

Rev 20:6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.
Scripture indicates how that TRUTH will be provided ... via kings and priests who reign with Christ on earth.


.
 
Upvote 0
Nov 16, 2009
3,039
134
Kentucky
✟27,610.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Hi Charles, :wave:


Just one minor clarification, Charles ...
Ezekiel 44:23 And they shall teach my people the difference between the holy and profane, and cause them to discern between the unclean and the clean.
24 And in controversy they shall stand in judgment; and they shall judge it according to my judgments: and they shall keep my laws and my statutes in all mine assemblies; and they shall hallow my sabbaths.

Rev 1:6 And hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father; to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.

Rev 5:10 And hast made us unto our God kings and priests: and we shall reign on the earth.

Rev 20:6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.
Scripture indicates how that TRUTH will be provided ... via kings and priests who reign with Christ on earth.


.
Should I rule over Abraham? Or should you rule over David? Should John rule over me, or Elijah over you?

We have but ONE King, and man's dominion is over nature, not man. Yes, we shall be made priests in that we shall be able to enter into the Holy Presence of our God.
 
Upvote 0

NightHawkeye

Work-in-progress
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2010
45,814
10,318
✟826,037.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Should I rule over Abraham? Or should you rule over David? Should John rule over me, or Elijah over you?
LOL.

I'm thinkin' I'll be happy just to be in the millennial kingdom, Charles ...

My point was more along the lines of truth and righteousness ...
Rev 19:4 And the four and twenty elders and the four beasts fell down and worshipped God that sat on the throne, saying, Amen; Alleluia.
5 And a voice came out of the throne, saying, Praise our God, all ye his servants, and ye that fear him, both small and great.
...
11 And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war.
...
15 And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.
We have but ONE King, and man's dominion is over nature, not man. Yes, we shall be made priests in that we shall be able to enter into the Holy Presence of our God.
For sure we don't know the details, Charles ...

I'm kinda thinking rule by truth and righteousness is rule by law in justice ... not totalitarian, not by corporations ...
Isaiah 65:21 And they shall build houses, and inhabit them; and they shall plant vineyards, and eat the fruit of them.
22 They shall not build, and another inhabit; they shall not plant, and another eat: for as the days of a tree are the days of my people, and mine elect shall long enjoy the work of their hands.
23 They shall not labour in vain, nor bring forth for trouble; for they are the seed of the blessed of the LORD, and their offspring with them.
24 And it shall come to pass, that before they call, I will answer; and while they are yet speaking, I will hear.
25 The wolf and the lamb shall feed together, and the lion shall eat straw like the bullock: and dust shall be the serpent's meat. They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain, saith the LORD.

Just my $0.02. Call me a dreamer.


.
 
Upvote 0

Watchman_2

Active Member
Jan 25, 2011
331
5
✟497.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Ha ha ha CLEARLY! now if it is, so pathetically clear, why is it that all through Jewish history this story written first in Hebrew has never been translated into the one you have just decribed as being so blantantly clear that even an idiot would arrive at this same conclusion. I challenge you to take Genesis 3 and have anyone who has not been mentored (brainwashed) by Arnold and see if your interpretation is as cyrstal clear as you concieve it to be. I must say the longer you fellas stay under his instruction the more you start acting like him. arrogence is not one of the fruits of the spirit. Again if you can find one person who hasn't studied under Arnold, who reads into the account of Genesis 3 the story you have just laid out, I will publically post what an Idiot I am for not seeing how clear the plainly written word of God is:bow:

Strawman argument! You asked for it in English and you received it. Instead of acknowledging your error and admitting your idiocy, you raise a pathetically weak and unlearned argument regarding your selective understanding of historical study.

Have you ever considered that it is the offspring of Satans' 'Jewish' history you are reading??
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Watchman_2

Active Member
Jan 25, 2011
331
5
✟497.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
you are a joke....the worst of students, even if doctrinally correct on MOST issues.

Considering the source -- Thank You!!

i did not post under MULTIPLE handles...as you seem to feel...for any disingenuous reason.
I changed for a personal reason, and I only posted under zeke37 NOW, for your benifit....
so you might remember the years we spent together at factnet.

Well, you know that there are those that post under multiple handles for nefarious reasons.

again, you lack reading comprehension.

Well, I read well enough to see the word 'count' in Rev. 13:18 and that the number is six hundred sixty-six. You are the one that claims that either 'count' does not exist or that the number is not 666. So, maybe you should examinine your own reading comprehension skills.

While you are evaluating your own reading comprehension skills, you might take a refresher course in mathematics. Most people know that, when counting in order, 6 comes after 1. So, logic dictates that, when an entity does not appear to the 6th event, it could not possibly have implemented the 'mark' which exists prior to the first event.

Pastor Murray teaches the seals are not chronological.
He also teaches that the 6th seal, as we read it, is NOT the wrath of the Lord, but that people only think it is.

Your hearing is skewed as well as your reading comprehension and math skills. See Rev. 6:17. For those who know the Truth and did not go whoring after the Beast, God's wrath does not affect them.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

realtruth101

Well-Known Member
Jan 26, 2011
597
21
✟903.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Food for thought.........


satan, the serpent was transformed from a glorious angel into a vile creature right?

I don't buy into UFO, alien, superior intelligence stuff, but perhaps the description of satan in the garden was a reference to his reptilian/alien appearance, and perhaps Eve did lay with him.

We can't possibly fully understand what exactly transpired those 6000 years ago, but we can grasp the fact that she and Adam disobeyed, and were thus enlightened by satan the great illuminator of humanity.

Was Cain the offspring of satan? IDK.
Will we be grafted into the Elohim after the millenial reign of our Master and King? IDK.

But what I do know is that Pastor Murray, and his Shepherd's Chapel have led me to a closer relationship with our Majesty, and for that he can not be judged.

People nitpick every popular teacher's every word, and we can't do that. The Lord enlightens whom He chooses, and NO MAN knows the whole of the picture being painted behind him.
Pastor Murray teaches the Gospel as does Pastor John Hagee as does Pastor Jack Van Impe. I take from each what the Lord shows me as 100% Gospel TRUTH, and when I take something that doesn't taste right, I spit it out. Sometimes I study it, review it until I understand it better, but if it still not the meat or the milk, don't eat it. Period.
Our Master, our King, our Rabbi is coming soon. He will teach us the TRUTH that is in everything good thing, and eliminate the lies of evil.

Praise and exalt Him above all forever!
I let the bible be my guide, that way I don't need to choose this and spit that out, that is the danger of following men and their teachings, they are not perfect, and if I had to constantly check and weigh what they say as to whether it was truth or not, it would get very tiring. You are only following Christ because Gods Spirit drew you onto Himself, men can only stir your spirit to lead a more Godly life, which in the case of the three men mentioned its very possible that all three could do this for you. but if your going to follow what the bible says and use it as a guide unto all truth, all three that you mentioned are teaching things that don't line up with what is written in the bible. If it doesn't bother you, don't worry about it......bottom line is those who believe that Jesus is the son of God, and that He died for their sins, and if they repent and follow Jesus they will live and have eternal life........just make sure those who you take instruction from don't change this......as for anything eles they teach that turns out to be false it will just be burned up like chaff.
 
Upvote 0

realtruth101

Well-Known Member
Jan 26, 2011
597
21
✟903.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Strawman argument! You asked for it in English and you received it. Instead of acknowleging your error and admitting your idiocy, you raise a pathetically weak and unlearned argument regarding your selective understanding of historical study.

Have you ever considered that it is the offspring of Satans' 'Jewish' history you are reading??
So what your saying is the KJV version along with every version of english translations of the bible are in error and they have wrong interpretations of Genesis 3?.......I'm not trying to give you a strawman arguement, I'm just trying to understand the way you see it. I'm simply stating that all translations whether Chinese or Russian all tell the story of Adam and Eve eating from a tree in the garden, Is this where the error is? I will acknowledge any error I have as long as you can help me understand where the error IS! is the bible mistranslated? is this the point your trying to tell me?
 
Upvote 0
Nov 16, 2009
3,039
134
Kentucky
✟27,610.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I let the bible be my guide, that way I don't need to choose this and spit that out, that is the danger of following men and their teachings, they are not perfect, and if I had to constantly check and weigh what they say as to whether it was truth or not, it would get very tiring. You are only following Christ because Gods Spirit drew you onto Himself, men can only stir your spirit to lead a more Godly life, which in the case of the three men mentioned its very possible that all three could do this for you. but if your going to follow what the bible says and use it as a guide unto all truth, all three that you mentioned are teaching things that don't line up with what is written in the bible. If it doesn't bother you, don't worry about it......bottom line is those who believe that Jesus is the son of God, and that He died for their sins, and if they repent and follow Jesus they will live and have eternal life........just make sure those who you take instruction from don't change this......as for anything eles they teach that turns out to be false it will just be burned up like chaff.
Good post:thumbsup:
 
Upvote 0

Watchman_2

Active Member
Jan 25, 2011
331
5
✟497.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
So what your saying is the KJV version along with every version of english translations of the bible are in error and they have wrong interpretations of Genesis 3?.......I'm not trying to give you a strawman arguement, I'm just trying to understand the way you see it. I'm simply stating that all translations whether Chinese or Russian all tell the story of Adam and Eve eating from a tree in the garden, Is this where the error is? I will acknowledge any error I have as long as you can help me understand where the error IS! is the bible mistranslated? is this the point your trying to tell me?

What I am saying is that, by your own mode of measurement, you are an IDIOT!

Eventhough there are some translational errors in the KJV, there is sufficient information therein, as I outlined for you, to prove that Satan has offspring. The FACT that Gen. 3:14-15 speaks of offspring gives the true Bible student the context for understanding that which took place in Gen. 3:6, which is confirmed in 3:7. In addition, this information confirms that the tree of life and the tree of knowledge of good and evil were not magic fruit trees, which confirms what is written in Gen. 2:9.

The tree of life is Christ -- before He was born in the flesh. The tree of knowledge of good and evil was Satan.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

zeke37

IMO...
May 24, 2007
11,706
225
✟35,694.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Considering the source -- Thank You!!
you are welcome. lol.
Again, speaking of your attitude. Not doctrine.


Well, you know that there are those that post under multiple handles for nefarious reasons.
Yep, one even posts here under zeke73 for that reason.

Well, I read well enough to see the word 'count' in Rev. 13:18 and that the number is six hundred sixty-six.
but you teach 6,6,6...not 666.

You are the one that claims that either 'count' does not exist or that the number is not 666.
huh? I made no such claim...post my quote if there is one. there is not.
I say the number is indeed 666...unlike you who change it to mean 6,6,6.

So, maybe you should examinine your own reading comprehension skills.
re-read....

While you are evaluating your own reading comprehension skills, you might take a refresher course in mathematics. Most people know that, when counting in order, 6 comes after 1.
hmmmm....like in the seals????

So, logic dictates that, when an entity does not appear to the 6th event, it could not possibly have implemented the 'mark' which exists prior to the first event.
hence you error lies in assuming that vials 1-5 are not about a time when he is here.

that is your error.
both vials 1 and 5 show your error, plain enough to the rest of us.

you are predisposed to believe as you do.
you cannot prove your assertation.

Your hearing is skewed as well as your reading comprehension and math skills. See Rev. 6:17. For those who know the Truth and did not go whoring after the Beast, God's wrath does not affect them.
so, are you sying that PM does not teach this? I am 100% sure he does.
you are in error again.
According to PM, the 6th seal, as we read it, is Satan's time and the first 6 in 666.
people are under deception, and only think it is God and His wrath
Of course he teaches seal 1 as Satan defacto too.




and your attitude is shameful.
 
Upvote 0

zeke37

IMO...
May 24, 2007
11,706
225
✟35,694.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
So what your saying is the KJV version along with every version of english translations of the bible are in error and they have wrong interpretations of Genesis 3?.......I'm not trying to give you a strawman arguement, I'm just trying to understand the way you see it. I'm simply stating that all translations whether Chinese or Russian all tell the story of Adam and Eve eating from a tree in the garden, Is this where the error is? I will acknowledge any error I have as long as you can help me understand where the error IS! is the bible mistranslated? is this the point your trying to tell me?
I dont think it is meant to be understood by everyone.
But it is chalked full of symbology...more than one angle.

Satan is an angel, and only called a serpent in Gen3, for symbolic purposes, and because of his shiney appearance...

the sexual implication is overwelmiong IMO.

-pregnancy,
-labour pains,
-covering genitalia,
-the word "touch" in hebrew's very next usage, is likewise translated touch, but is clearly sexual in nature.
-twins
Cain is called as much by Jesus, as the first murderer...

so, perhaps it is not about eating a piece of fruit...
but about producing fruit...of the loins...seed.

one good line, and one bad line.
Gen3:15 seems to go along with this.
 
Upvote 0

Manasseh_

not the evil king Manasseh
Dec 26, 2010
1,512
17
✟24,531.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
What I am saying is that, by your own mode of measurement, you are an IDIOT!

Eventhough there are some translational errors in the KJV, there is sufficient information therein, as I outlined for you, to prove that Satan has offspring. The FACT that Gen. 3:14-15 speaks of offspring gives the true Bible student the context for understanding that which took place in Gen. 3:6, which is confirmed in 3:7. In addition, this information confirms that the tree of life and the tree of knowledge of good and evil were not magic fruit trees, which confirms what is written in Gen. 2:9.

The true bible student, in a hundred years, wouldn't come to the conclusion of what arnold murry teaches (serpent seed) simply because the true bible student would study everything about Gen 3 and find no teaching whatsoever of satan seducing Eve into having sex, which is an impossibility for spirit beings (angels) whether true to God or fallen angels

satan BEGUILED Eve.................

Gen 3:13 And the LORD God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat.

the hebrew word for beguiled

H5377
נשׁא
nâshâ'
naw-shaw'
A primitive root; to lead astray, that is, (mentally) to delude, or (morally) to seduce: - beguile, deceive, X greatly, X utterly.

if Moses had intended to convey satan actually having intercourse with Eve then he would have used the word yada, not nasha
..........and Moses was simply clear in his witness of the genesis that cain came from flesh, not from some absurd teaching that he came from a spirit being and a human

the english definition of beguile or beguiled.............

be·guile tr.v. be·guiled, be·guil·ing, be·guiles. 1. To deceive by guile; delude. See Synonyms at deceive. 2. To take away from by or as if by guile; cheat: a disease that has beguiled me of strength. 3. To distract the attention of; divert:

notice the main synonym is DECEIVE and to make it even more clear the definition for guile ...............guile n. 1. Treacherous cunning; skillful deceit.
notice also within the definition of beguile another meaning is to DISTRACT the attention of................and as anyone can read that's exactly what satan's intentions were, to distract Eve away from God's teaching about obeying him and focus on other aspects........aspects that appealed to human nature, the fruit she saw as pleasant looking , pleasant enough to eat , also satan lying to her that neither she or her husband adam would die if they did choose to disobey God, not only would they continue to live if they ate the fruit but it would "make them wise" again appealing to the senses of humans, "I won't die, it's good for food and not only that it's "brain food".........I'll be smarter"..........................

very sneaky of satan huh.................and that is exactly what scripture throughout warns about his devices..........it all goes to deception, not sex

arnold murry explicitly claims the bible doesn't say that Cain was Adam's offspring.............

Gen 4:1 And Adam knew (yada) Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD. ......the same word yada is used again when Abel was conceived, showing more proof that Cain was Adam's son by Eve.

Gen 4:25 And Adam knew (yada) his wife again; and she bare a son, and called his name Seth: For God, said she, hath appointed me another seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew.

apparently Murry's glasses were clouded when he was reading the beginning of chapter 4................Adam "knew".....that's the hebrew word yada for a man and woman having intercourse, in this simple case , man and wife........exactly what God had intended and what God had blessed......be fruitful and multiply...............God gave no such blessing to carry over to include satan also...............

Eve confirmed through the birth of Cain God's blessing of being fruitful and multiply........."I have gotten a man from the LORD"
again a true bible student knows that LORD in caps is the tetragrammaton.............God himself blessing Eve's womb.............had Eve "gotten" a man from satan then Moses would have written Hasatan or satawn............never has the tetragrammaton been used to refer to satan in scripture..........................EVER !

the true bible student would have this verse to give even more understanding..........

Act 17:26 And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;

from ONE BLOOD ,ie, from Adam and Eve, God created ALL MEN........... blood is flesh only, the life is in the blood (flesh) immortals are not flesh or blood, they are composed of spirit.........and spirit does not procreate to create life, spirit has life inherent.

a human is satan's seed by their actions (sin) not by procreation..........

Joh 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

the true bible student isn't the idiot when they hear arnold murray's racist teaching of "kenites" and "serpent seed".........they are true because when they study to show themselves approved to God they have revealed to them through God's word that arnold murray is a false teacher and his doctrine is a prime example of the imaginations of men running amuck and those foolish people that actually believe what came from these false teachers' imaginations
 
Upvote 0

Watchman_2

Active Member
Jan 25, 2011
331
5
✟497.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
The true bible student, in a hundred years, wouldn't come to the conclusion of what arnold murry teaches (serpent seed) simply because the true bible student would study everything about Gen 3 and find no teaching whatsoever of satan seducing Eve into having sex, which is an impossibility for spirit beings (angels) whether true to God or fallen angels

You say that because you are unlearned in Bible and are not a 'true' Bible student. See Post No. 241 for the background, in English, which proves that Satan impregnated the woman in the Garden.

Perhaps, you have never read Gen. 6, where the fallen angels impregnated the females of the Adamic race. Your ignorance appears to be the result of your misguided claim that angels are simply 'spirit beings'. You should go do your homework prior to making such false statements.

satan BEGUILED Eve.................

Gen 3:13 And the LORD God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat.

the hebrew word for beguiled

H5377
נשׁא
nâshâ'
naw-shaw'
A primitive root; to lead astray, that is, (mentally) to delude, or (morally) to seduce: - beguile, deceive, X greatly, X utterly.

if Moses had intended to convey satan actually having intercourse with Eve then he would have used the word yada, not nasha
..........and Moses was simply clear in his witness of the genesis that cain came from flesh, not from some absurd teaching that he came from a spirit being and a human

the english definition of beguile or beguiled.............

be·guile tr.v. be·guiled, be·guil·ing, be·guiles. 1. To deceive by guile; delude. See Synonyms at deceive. 2. To take away from by or as if by guile; cheat: a disease that has beguiled me of strength. 3. To distract the attention of; divert:

notice the main synonym is DECEIVE and to make it even more clear the definition for guile ...............guile n. 1. Treacherous cunning; skillful deceit.
notice also within the definition of beguile another meaning is to DISTRACT the attention of................and as anyone can read that's exactly what satan's intentions were, to distract Eve away from God's teaching about obeying him and focus on other aspects........aspects that appealed to human nature, the fruit she saw as pleasant looking , pleasant enough to eat , also satan lying to her that neither she or her husband adam would die if they did choose to disobey God, not only would they continue to live if they ate the fruit but it would "make them wise" again appealing to the senses of humans, "I won't die, it's good for food and not only that it's "brain food".........I'll be smarter"..........................

very sneaky of satan huh.................and that is exactly what scripture throughout warns about his devices..........it all goes to deception, not sex[/quote]

Moses is not the author of Genesis -- God is. The account is given in such manner by God to distinguish we true Bible students from the rest of you. See Post No. 241. All your blustering and bloviating will not alter the end result in that which took place in Gen. 3:6 resulted in the woman's pregnancy by Satan [3:14-15].

If you look at the context of the woman's statement regarding being 'beguiled' by Satan, you should have been drawn back to the interchange in 3:1-5. Of course, Satan is a liar and the father of lies. However, one also sees the woman embellishing the truth as well in v. 3.
Gen 3:3 But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.

The word rendered 'touch' has sexual connotation. See Strong's -
H5060
נגע
nâga‛
naw-gah'
A primitive root; properly to touch, that is, lay the hand upon (for any purpose; euphemistically, to lie with a woman); by implication to reach (figuratively to arrive, acquire); violently, to strike (punish, defeat, destroy, etc.): - beat, (X be able to) bring (down), cast, come (nigh), draw near (nigh), get up, happen, join, near, plague, reach (up), smite, strike, touch.

Hence, in being 'beguiled' by Satan, one can see that Eve is being sexually seduced. Apostle Paul confirms this as well.
2Co 11:3 But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.

The word rendered 'beguiled' in Strong's -
G1818
ἐξαπατάω
exapataō
ex-ap-at-ah'-o
From G1537 and G538; to seduce wholly: - beguile, deceive.

Certainly, 'wholly seduced' can mean about anything from being Madoff'd to sex. But, what it does mean is that one cannot ascertain, by the woman's use of the word rendered 'beguiled' in Gen. 3:13, that which took place in Gen. 3:6. The beguilement was in the converstaion between the woman and Satan in 3:1-5.

In order to know that which took place in 3:6, one utilizes 3:7 plus the resultant of the act, which is detailed in 3:14-15 and confirmed in 3:20.

arnold murry explicitly claims the bible doesn't say that Cain was Adam's offspring.............
Gen 4:1 And Adam knew (yada) Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD. ......the same word yada is used again when Abel was conceived, showing more proof that Cain was Adam's son by Eve.

Gen 4:25 And Adam knew (yada) his wife again; and she bare a son, and called his name Seth: For God, said she, hath appointed me another seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew.

apparently Murry's glasses were clouded when he was reading the beginning of chapter 4................Adam "knew".....that's the hebrew word yada for a man and woman having intercourse, in this simple case , man and wife........exactly what God had intended and what God had blessed......be fruitful and multiply...............God gave no such blessing to carry over to include satan also...............

See Post No. 241. Obviously, your eyes are clouded! The woman already had her name 'Eve' before Adam ever had sex with her. Adam named her 'Eve' in 3:20 because she was already pregnant!

Eve confirmed through the birth of Cain God's blessing of being fruitful and multiply........."I have gotten a man from the LORD"
again a true bible student knows that LORD in caps is the tetragrammaton.............God himself blessing Eve's womb.............had Eve "gotten" a man from satan then Moses would have written Hasatan or satawn............never has the tetragrammaton been used to refer to satan in scripture..........................EVER !

Nonsense! According to your logic, the fact that God created woman to bear children has some bearing as to who is the sire of the children born.

the true bible student would have this verse to give even more understanding..........
Act 17:26 And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;

from ONE BLOOD ,ie, from Adam and Eve, God created ALL MEN........... blood is flesh only, the life is in the blood (flesh) immortals are not flesh or blood, they are composed of spirit.........and spirit does not procreate to create life, spirit has life inherent.

LOL...Once again, you prove to all that you are not a 'true' Bible student. The rendering 'blood' is not in the original text of Acts 17:26. The 'one' refers to the dust/clay of the ground. We all sustain our bodies from food grown out of the ground. This scripture has no bearing on who sired who in Gen. 3.

a human is satan's seed by their actions (sin) not by procreation..........

The word 'seed' does not mean that. See Strong's -
H2233
זרע
zera‛
zeh'-rah
From H2232; seed; figuratively fruit, plant, sowing time, posterity: - X carnally, child, fruitful, seed (-time), sowing-time.

In Gen. 3:15, it means 'posterity' -- nothing else!

Joh 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

Thank you -- more proof of what I am stating. Those Pharisees were the direct offspring of Satan, the father of lies, through his son Cain, the first murderer.

the true bible student isn't the idiot when they hear arnold murray's racist teaching of "kenites" and "serpent seed".........they are true because when they study to show themselves approved to God they have revealed to them through God's word that arnold murray is a false teacher and his doctrine is a prime example of the imaginations of men running amuck and those foolish people that actually believe what came from these false teachers' imaginations

I agree that the true bible student is not an idiot -- however, you are far removed from being a 'true' bible student. In fact, all that you have accomplished in your lengthy post is demonstrate your Bible illiteracy.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

zeke37

IMO...
May 24, 2007
11,706
225
✟35,694.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
The true bible student, in a hundred years, wouldn't come to the conclusion of what arnold murry teaches (serpent seed) simply because the true bible student would study everything about Gen 3 and find no teaching whatsoever of satan seducing Eve into having sex, which is an impossibility for spirit beings (angels) whether true to God or fallen angels
actually, i came to that conclusion Bro.
The fallen angels (sons of God, Job1-2) can and DID produce offspring with the adamic women, as told in Gen6.

angels in the bible are physical beings...able to reproduce with wo-mankind.

in Sodom, the `men`even wanted to have sex with the angels.
satan BEGUILED Eve.................

Gen 3:13 And the LORD God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat.

the hebrew word for beguiled

H5377
נשׁא
nâshâ'
naw-shaw'
A primitive root; to lead astray, that is, (mentally) to delude, or (morally) to seduce: - beguile, deceive, X greatly, X utterly.
to seduce...
in the NT, in 2Cor11, the greek word translated beguiled, means wholly seduced.
in every way.
1818
exapataw
exapatao
ex-ap-at-ah'-o
from ek - ek 1537 and apataw - apatao 538; to seduce wholly:--beguile, deceive.


if Moses had intended to convey satan actually having intercourse with Eve then he would have used the word yada, not nasha
says who? it is symbology...a euphemism. a polite way to get across your point.

God uses the same language with Abimelech, in a dream to him...Gen20.

3But God came to Abimelech in a dream by night, and said to him, Behold, thou art but a dead man, for the woman which thou hast taken; for she is a man's wife.
4But Abimelech had not come near her: and he said, LORD, wilt thou slay also a righteous nation?
5Said he not unto me, She is my sister? and she, even she herself said, He is my brother: in the integrity of my heart and innocency of my hands have I done this. 6And God said unto him in a dream, Yea, I know that thou didst this in the integrity of thy heart; for I also withheld thee from sinning against me: therefore suffered I thee not to touch her.
..........and Moses was simply clear in his witness of the genesis that cain came from flesh, not from some absurd teaching that he came from a spirit being and a human

Brother, the same thing happens in the masses, in Gen6.

the english definition of beguile or beguiled.............
be·guile tr.v. be·guiled, be·guil·ing, be·guiles. 1. To deceive by guile; delude. See Synonyms at deceive. 2. To take away from by or as if by guile; cheat: a disease that has beguiled me of strength. 3. To distract the attention of; divert:

notice the main synonym is DECEIVE and to make it even more clear the definition for guile ...............guile n. 1. Treacherous cunning; skillful deceit.
notice also within the definition of beguile another meaning is to DISTRACT the attention of................
no one debates that...
but she was seduced in every way....including sexually.

and as anyone can read that's exactly what satan's intentions were, to distract Eve away from God's teaching about obeying him and focus on other aspects........aspects that appealed to human nature, the fruit she saw as pleasant looking , pleasant enough to eat , also satan lying to her that neither she or her husband adam would die if they did choose to disobey God, not only would they continue to live if they ate the fruit but it would "make them wise" again appealing to the senses of humans, "I won't die, it's good for food and not only that it's "brain food".........I'll be smarter"..........................
it's funny how two people can read the same thing, and get two completely different results.

very sneaky of satan huh.................and that is exactly what scripture throughout warns about his devices..........it all goes to deception, not sex
one of his tools was sex. Adam and eve had no idea of sex yet...
Satan seduced Eve, Cain is the result.
she then showed Adam what Satan showed her...
IOW, Adam ate the fruit too....Abel is the result.

again, labour pains, pregnancy, covering genitalia, the euphemism of "touch"...etc.
How can you not see a sexual implication?

arnold murry explicitly claims the bible doesn't say that Cain was Adam's offspring.............
the bible does not.

Gen 4:1 And Adam knew (yada) Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD. ......the same word yada is used again when Abel was conceived, showing more proof that Cain was Adam's son by Eve.
not. if he was, then he'd be in Adam's geneology. he is not.
he has his own geneology. he is NOT in Adam's geneology.

Gen4:1 was divided by folks 100's and 100's of years after the fact.
It was not written with chapter divisions. someone got it wrong.
Seth was the replacement seed to carry on Adam`s line after the murder of righteous Abel....not Cain
Cain is jut not Adam`s son.

Gen 4:25 And Adam knew (yada) his wife again; and she bare a son, and called his name Seth: For God, said she, hath appointed me another seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew.

apparently Murry's glasses were clouded when he was reading the beginning of chapter 4................Adam "knew".....that's the hebrew word yada for a man and woman having intercourse, in this simple case , man and wife........exactly what God had intended and what God had blessed......be fruitful and multiply...............God gave no such blessing to carry over to include satan also...............
so, as we can read, Cain was the firstborn...
don't you find it interesting that Abel was the one replaced for the geneology, and not Cain?
seriously?
being a murderer does not negate ones official standing in their geneology.

Cain is not the one replaced. Abel is. Abel was Adam's seed that neededto be replaced.... not Cain.
 
Upvote 0

zeke37

IMO...
May 24, 2007
11,706
225
✟35,694.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Eve confirmed through the birth of Cain God's blessing of being fruitful and multiply.........

no...Gen3:15 is where you look for Cain's and his offspring's promise from God. the seed of the serpent.

"I have gotten a man from the LORD"
again a true bible student knows that LORD in caps is the tetragrammaton.............

YHVH...

but remember that Eve was totally seduced in every way.

God himself blessing Eve's womb.............had Eve "gotten" a man from satan then Moses would have written Hasatan or satawn............never has the tetragrammaton been used to refer to satan in scripture..........................EVER !

what you dont seem to understand, is that God or Moses is not proclaiming that she got a man from the Lord....
SHE is the one CLAIMING that. This shows the level of her seduction.
total beguilement.

the true bible student would have this verse to give even more understanding..........

Act 17:26 And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;

from ONE BLOOD ,ie, from Adam and Eve, God created ALL MEN........... blood is flesh only, the life is in the blood (flesh) immortals are not flesh or blood, they are composed of spirit.........and spirit does not procreate to create life, spirit has life inherent.

angels are spiritual beings and quite physical.
The bible teaches us about them,
and they surely can interact with us in what ever level they want to. including sexuality.

a human is satan's seed by their actions (sin) not by procreation..........
perhaps both....one on a physical level and one on a spiritual level.
Infact that is how I understand it. A physical beginning to a spiritual end.


Joh 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

the true bible student isn't the idiot when they hear arnold murray's racist teaching of "kenites" and "serpent seed".........

there is nothing racist about it...
if Mr Murray identified a certain people known today as being kenites, ie jews or germans or whatever, then that'd be different.
but he does not.
you cannot tell them from physical attributes...so nothing racist about it...

he does not teach against skin colour or hooked noses or whatever...
he is really not racist in the least.

infact, Mr murray claims the kenites are mainly white skinned, like Adam and Eve and Abel.

He also teaches that even a kenite can come to Christ.

they are true because when they study to show themselves approved to God they have revealed to them through God's word that arnold murray is a false teacher
so does that mean you believe that i am not true?
he is very easily the very best bible teacher in the whole world IMO.
being mainstream is not necc. the correct position.


and his doctrine is a prime example of the imaginations of men running amuck and those foolish people that actually believe what came from these false teachers' imaginations
so, now i'm foolish?
I thought we were buddies?

I thought we agreed on more than we disagree on.
And my bible scholarship can be attributed to Mr Murray to a great extent.

i only answered because watchman2 might not be the best person for you to discuss Mr Murray`s teachings with....

his attitude is unChristian and he is in error on a few subjects.
 
Upvote 0