Ark of the Covenant found FYI

prodromos

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2003
21,601
12,132
58
Sydney, Straya
✟1,182,091.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
So was Jesus feigning when He said?:
Matthew 24:36
"But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.
I gave my understanding in post #23
 
Upvote 0

4x4toy

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2014
3,599
1,773
✟116,025.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
It was out of humility and for the benefit of others that Jesus feigned ignorance.

That seems to be a particular 'tradition' in some churches and is what they teach in their seminaries. That has nothing to do with the fields of Geology and Archaeology.

You don't see the similarity between Joseph Smith's discovery of the gold plates and Ron's discovery of the Ark? Both 'seen' by a select few (in Ron's case, he appears to be the only one) and no longer visible to anyone else.
Who says and how have they determined that the Jerusalem ossuary contained the bones of Peter the Apostle? This is news to me.

Ron seems sincere in his beliefs. That doesn't make him right.

Most of his other 'finds' were debunked long ago.

^_^
 
Upvote 0

Guide To The Bible

Guide To The Bible
Jan 23, 2017
1,280
224
Britain
✟31,977.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I gave my understanding in post #23

I asked Prodromos whether Jesus feigning when He said?:
Matthew 24:36
"But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.

Because in post #36 Prodromos said: "It was out of humility and for the benefit of others that Jesus feigned ignorance."

Porodromos said; "I gave my understanding in post #23"

This is his answer in: #23 "It seems to me that He told His disciples that only the Father knew so that they would not keep asking Him but would instead be watchful. Had He told them the day, they could have become complacent, knowing that He would not actually return in their lifetime."

This is because Prodromos believes the following:

#20 "Jesus worked as a carpenter but as God He had all knowledge."

Now I somewhat actually agree with this point of view because when Jesus said ‘no one knows the day’ He said it in the present tense, He did not say no one would ever know as Amos alludes to:

Amos 3:7 – Surely the Sovereign LORD does nothing without revealing his plan to his servants the prophets.

And because it’s important not to build a theology on a couple of verses but instead put everything into context, letting the Bible interpret the Bible as Isaiah teaches:

Isaiah 28:13 – line upon line, precept upon precept

We should therefore also considered the following verses:

1 Thessalonians 5:4 – “You’re not in darkness for that day to surprise you like a thief.”

And:

Deuteronomy 16:16 – Three times a year all your men must appear before the LORD your God at the place he will choose:

Passover : Fulfilled by Jesus.
Pentecost : Fulfilled by Jesus.
Tabernacles : To be Fulfilled…

Jesus actually fulfilled 11 out of 12 Jewish holy-days and is beyond coincidence. Therefore He must return on the one He has yet to fulfill, this is the feast of Tabernacles that celebrates the harvest. Many know it as Harvest festival and it alludes to the great harvest of souls at the end of age. I hope and pray you can see and believe this, and will not be like the Jews who missed His first coming by not recognising all these signs.

Jesus actually also alluded to the fact that He would fulfill Tabernacles at a later time when He said:

John 7:2 & 8 – But when the Jewish Festival of Tabernacles was near, [Jesus said] “You go to the festival. I am not going up to this festival, because my time has not yet fully come.”
 
Upvote 0

prodromos

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2003
21,601
12,132
58
Sydney, Straya
✟1,182,091.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
I'm reposting my previous remark here for you as you didn't seem to have taken it in:

Are you kidding. Have you ever been there. Perhaps try and contact them and ask if they would let anyone possibility dig there. I just wouldn't happen. It was a miracle that they let Ron dig there. He was not even a 'professional'. The story behind how they let him is like the book of Esther as it has many coincidences that came together and to this day, I don't think any one person knows all the story (not even Ron did). However, he was there for over three years on and off as he carried out his dig but I do agree he was the only one to see the Ark Of the covenant (apart from the blurred photo he took) and for good reason too! But then consider all of the other sites he found have been seen by millions of people: Pharaohs chariot wheels in the Gulf of Aqaba, Mount Sinai, Aaron's alter, the rock Moses struck, Sodom & Gomorrah and Noah's Ark. All of these are there for everyone to see and visit (although getting to Mt. Sinai is tricky because the Arabs don't like anyone going there and so it is guarded).
ARCHEOLOGY WITH RON WYATT: a personal account
Our team proceeded to the Garden Tomb, whose custodians were expecting our arrival. Wyatt had negotiated cordially and successfully with them. With an assortment of gardening tools we set to work, moving a large pile of rubble and rock which had accumulated where Wyatt had probed earlier. Over several days we were able to excavate our way down into the same cave system that Wyatt had explored two years before. I'm sorry to report that in the end we came up empty-handed. The connecting channel through which Wyatt had claimed to see the furniture was not there. On the final day of excavation, when we could not see the internal cavern landmarks that Wyatt had predicted, Ron himself finally climbed down into the dim space. After a long time he emerged, looking confused. As we waited respectfully to hear his report, he mumbled a few words like: "It's not the same; it's changed. It's not the way I remember it." There was no opening to be seen, giving a view into an adjacent cavern. There was nothing. In the process of our digging we had come up with a few interesting little objects from Roman times, but they were irrelevant to our main goal.

Our team was disappointed, puzzled, disillusioned. We had enjoyed ten days of close fellowship, with daily shared prayer times, and an excited anticipation of momentous events just before us. Now all those hopes came crashing down. And sadly, Wyatt was not man enough to come clean, to apologize for bringing us on a wild goose chase, or to attempt any kind of explanation. We kept expecting some sort of statement, but he just remained silent, withdrawn. And we were too stunned, and perhaps too sorry for him in his confusion, to demand that he explain.

To this day I cannot give a rational account for the extreme misguidedness that Wyatt revealed. What was happening in his head? His participation in our group worship times had left all of us in no doubt about his sincerity and his devotion to Scripture. He was a competent Bible scholar. He was a brother. Yet he had misled us terribly, and had offered no words of regret or apology or explanation. I have reviewed the whole story many times since then, and am convinced that the church administrator was right: Wyatt might be mistaken, but he himself believed that what he had originally shared was true.

From medical school I remember hearing of a rare state of mind, with a long Latin name, that led its victims to concoct marvelously detailed accounts of events that were pure fabrications, yet which the story-teller himself had come to believe were absolutely true. I am inclined to believe that Wyatt was a florid example of this disorder. He was not a deliberate liar, a fraud. And some of his observations had merit. But I am convinced that some of his "discoveries" were matters which underwent transcription in his mind, and he came to believe as true certain ideas and observations that in fact were his own inventions.

This opinion became confirmed in my mind some time after the Jerusalem expedition. Wyatt was trying to convince everyone of the validity of his site for Noah's Ark. And in trying to convince me, he described some extraordinary details of the rock-and-earth formation that he believed gives us an outline of the Ark. He told me of probing with a tool into the earthen mound, and breaking into a cavity in which he could see--actually see--the remains of corroded metal "brackets" that he presumed were part of the Ark's construction. This description caught my attention--all of it. If Wyatt's report was factual, then we should get serious about his site for the Ark. But was Wyatt a trustworthy observer and reporter? Months later I followed up on this story, referring to my long-time friend John Baumgardner, who had personally visited Wyatt's Ark site, and had subjected the whole area to minute scrutiny, including a survey with penetrating radar. When I described to John the eyewitness report of Wyatt, he simply laughed and dismissed the whole thing. He assured me, beyond any doubt, that the Ark site under study revealed no cavitation as described by Wyatt, and that the description given to me was entirely a fabrication.

So there you have it. I am a long-time member of the S.D.A. fraternity, and have a high regard for Scripture and for handling its text in a responsible way. I am embarrassed that Wyatt, who identified himself with my community of faith, should turn out to be an unreliable witness to important archaeological data. I cannot put any confidence in his opinions, his assertions, or his declared eyewitness reports. Yet the man I knew, now at rest, was truly a man of The Word. He knew his Bible, and I heard him give impressive expositions of some difficult passages. In full verbal flight he could be eloquent. I expect his Bible study class was a good one. Yet he was sadly flawed. From close personal acquaintance, I cling to the belief that he was sincere, at the same time as he was woefully mistaken. It was through some quirk of mental dysfunction that he came himself to believe as true certain facts and stories that were his own inventions.​
 
Upvote 0

4x4toy

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2014
3,599
1,773
✟116,025.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
It was out of humility and for the benefit of others that Jesus feigned ignorance.

That seems to be a particular 'tradition' in some churches and is what they teach in their seminaries. That has nothing to do with the fields of Geology and Archaeology.

You don't see the similarity between Joseph Smith's discovery of the gold plates and Ron's discovery of the Ark? Both 'seen' by a select few (in Ron's case, he appears to be the only one) and no longer visible to anyone else.
Who says and how have they determined that the Jerusalem ossuary contained the bones of Peter the Apostle? This is news to me.

Ron seems sincere in his beliefs. That doesn't make him right.

Most of his other 'finds' were debunked long ago.






Where is the Ark of the Covenant?





Introduction
The Ark of the Covenant disappeared off of the pages of history by the time of the Babylonian Captivity. Nothing in the Bible is said about the Ark in the Old Testament after the return from Babylon, but the Apocrypha states that the Ark could not be found when the Jewish people rebuilt the Temple at the time of Ezra and Zechariah. The explanation in the Apocrypha was that Jeremiah hid the Ark in a cave in Mt. Nebo before the Babylonian invasion, and that its location would not be revealed until God was ready for it to be found.

No Ark in the Second Temple
Thus, the Holy of Holies in the Second Temple was an empty chamber, without the Ark of the Covenant. When the Roman General Pompey conquered Jerusalem around 63 B.C., he demanded the privilege of entering the Holy of Holies. When he did, he came out saying that he could not understand what all the interest was about the sanctuary, when it was only an empty room.

The fact that the Ark of the Covenant was not used in the Second Temple has led to the speculation of where the Ark is, or if it still exists on the earth. The Ark was so important in Israel from the time of Moses through the Judges and the First Temple era, that it seems remarkable that nothing is said of it in the Bible after the Babylonian Captivity, until the Letter to the Hebrews and the Book of Revelation in the New Testament. In Hebrews it is described as it was in the original Tabernacle made by Moses; and in Revelation, the Ark is seen by John in heaven. In neither case is the Ark mentioned as something that remains on the earth now.

Is the Ark Needed for the Tribulation Temple?
One question that arises is, can the Temple be rebuilt if it does not contain the Ark? The Scriptures indicate that the Temple will be rebuilt and standing during the Tribulation period, and that the Tribulation Temple will be desecrated by the Antichrist. How can the worship of Yahweh be resumed as it was in ancient times if there is no Ark in the Holy of Holies? We have already seen, though, that the absence of the Ark of the Covenant did not keep the Temple from being rebuilt at the conclusion of the Babylonian Captivity.

The Second Temple stood for over 500 years without containing an Ark, and it was fully recognized as a valid house of worship for the Lord. Christ Himself declared the Temple to be His Father’s House. So it would not be unthinkable to build the Tribulation Temple, even if the Ark is not discovered. If the Ark does still exist, however, and it were somehow discovered, it would certainly give rise to a strong movement in Israel and around the world to rebuild the Temple to house the Ark properly.

Is the Ark Hidden in the Temple Mount?
There persists a legend that the Ark does exist on earth, but is hidden. A recently published book by Randall Price, entitled In Search of Temple Treasures, presents the various views on what has happened to the Ark. Some of the traditions place the Ark outside of Israel, such as at Mt. Nebo, Egypt and even far-off Ethiopia. But all of these traditions have problems and seem unlikely, since there is a lack of any scriptural evidence for them.

A view that has predominated in rabbinic circles is that the Ark was hidden in a cave beneath the Temple Mount in the very heart of Israel. The theory goes that the priests hid the Ark beneath the Temple Mount, perhaps as early as during the time of King Josiah, since the coming prophesied invasion by the Babylonians was only a matter of time. By hiding the Ark and other Temple treasures, the priests felt that the priceless sacred articles could be protected from desecration by the pagan invaders.

Why Didn’t Israel Use the Ark in the Second Temple?
As it turned out, the Babylonians did invade Jerusalem. They destroyed the Temple and carried away many of the vessels and implements to their capital city a thousand miles away. No mention is made in the Scriptures of the Babylonians taking the Ark, the Menorah, or other key Temple items. If the Ark and the other implements were hidden under the Temple, why weren’t they recovered and used after the Captivity? It’s hard to imagine that the priests would have knowingly left the Ark out of the Holy of Holies if they could have utilized it during the 500 years of the Second Temple.

The explanation offered is that they felt that as long as Jerusalem was subject to domination by the succeeding powers of Babylonia, Persia, Greece, and Rome, the Ark and other treasures could be desecrated and captured by the Gentile armies. Thus, the sacred items would remain in seclusion until it was considered safe to bring them out to be placed in the Temple.

The Rabbinical Attempt to Find the Ark
At any rate, Rabbi Shlomo Goren and Rabbi Yehuda Getz, the rabbis in charge of the Western Wall area, are convinced that the Ark has been hidden in a cave in the Temple Mount directly under the site of the Holy of Holies, since the time of King Josiah. They probably represent the majority of Orthodox rabbis in their views. They have a concept of vertical air space, by which the space of the Holy of Holies sanctifies the ground directly below it. Thus, the ancient priests would have been careful to locate the cave repository for the Ark in the sanctified area below the Holy of Holies. The evidence for all of these suppositions about the location of the Ark, as Rabbi Getz concedes, comes more from the Talmud than the Scriptures. Nevertheless, there is a large and growing group of Orthodox Jewish adherents who believe that the Ark is in this cave below the Holy of Holies, and awaits the right time to be found.

Rabbi Getz believes that in 1982 he was very close, within 40 feet, to finding the cave in which the Ark resides. He was conducting a search in an old tunnel that had been filled with the debris of centuries, which runs perpendicular to the Western Wall and under the Temple Mount. However, when the Moslems discovered that there were diggings being conducted under the Dome of the Rock, they threatened a general riot and the diggings were stopped. The rabbi explains that, for the sake of maintaining peace with their Moslem neighbors, the Israelis had to reseal the entrance to the tunnel, and it remains blocked up to this day.

Temple Interest an Indication of the Imminent Rapture
The Scriptures are not clear as to whether the Ark of the Covenant still exists on the earth, but they are clear that the Temple will be rebuilt and standing during the Tribulation. There is no question that if the Ark were found, it would give enormous impetus to the rebuilding of the Temple to house it. Bible-believing Christians should keep a sharp eye out for any developments surrounding the Temple Mount, realizing that it is a key element leading to the Tribulation era. The closer we get to the Tribulation, the closer we are to the imminent Rapture of the Church, which, we believe the Scriptures teach, will precede the Tribulation. Even so, come quickly, Lord Jesus.

Copyright © 1997 Zola Levitt Ministries, Inc., a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization. All rights reserved. Brief passages may be quoted in reviews or other article. For all other use, please get our written approval.

Zola Levitt Presents

Copyright © 2017 Zola Levitt Ministries. All rights reserved. | Privacy | Contact Us
ECFA member

g.gif
 
  • Informative
Reactions: JackRT
Upvote 0

Guide To The Bible

Guide To The Bible
Jan 23, 2017
1,280
224
Britain
✟31,977.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
ARCHEOLOGY WITH RON WYATT: a personal account
Our team proceeded to the Garden Tomb, whose custodians were expecting our arrival. Wyatt had negotiated cordially and successfully with them. With an assortment of gardening tools we set to work, moving a large pile of rubble and rock which had accumulated where Wyatt had probed earlier. Over several days we were able to excavate our way down into the same cave system that Wyatt had explored two years before. I'm sorry to report that in the end we came up empty-handed. The connecting channel through which Wyatt had claimed to see the furniture was not there. On the final day of excavation, when we could not see the internal cavern landmarks that Wyatt had predicted, Ron himself finally climbed down into the dim space. After a long time he emerged, looking confused. As we waited respectfully to hear his report, he mumbled a few words like: "It's not the same; it's changed. It's not the way I remember it." There was no opening to be seen, giving a view into an adjacent cavern. There was nothing. In the process of our digging we had come up with a few interesting little objects from Roman times, but they were irrelevant to our main goal.

Our team was disappointed, puzzled, disillusioned. We had enjoyed ten days of close fellowship, with daily shared prayer times, and an excited anticipation of momentous events just before us. Now all those hopes came crashing down. And sadly, Wyatt was not man enough to come clean, to apologize for bringing us on a wild goose chase, or to attempt any kind of explanation. We kept expecting some sort of statement, but he just remained silent, withdrawn. And we were too stunned, and perhaps too sorry for him in his confusion, to demand that he explain.

To this day I cannot give a rational account for the extreme misguidedness that Wyatt revealed. What was happening in his head? His participation in our group worship times had left all of us in no doubt about his sincerity and his devotion to Scripture. He was a competent Bible scholar. He was a brother. Yet he had misled us terribly, and had offered no words of regret or apology or explanation. I have reviewed the whole story many times since then, and am convinced that the church administrator was right: Wyatt might be mistaken, but he himself believed that what he had originally shared was true.

From medical school I remember hearing of a rare state of mind, with a long Latin name, that led its victims to concoct marvelously detailed accounts of events that were pure fabrications, yet which the story-teller himself had come to believe were absolutely true. I am inclined to believe that Wyatt was a florid example of this disorder. He was not a deliberate liar, a fraud. And some of his observations had merit. But I am convinced that some of his "discoveries" were matters which underwent transcription in his mind, and he came to believe as true certain ideas and observations that in fact were his own inventions.

This opinion became confirmed in my mind some time after the Jerusalem expedition. Wyatt was trying to convince everyone of the validity of his site for Noah's Ark. And in trying to convince me, he described some extraordinary details of the rock-and-earth formation that he believed gives us an outline of the Ark. He told me of probing with a tool into the earthen mound, and breaking into a cavity in which he could see--actually see--the remains of corroded metal "brackets" that he presumed were part of the Ark's construction. This description caught my attention--all of it. If Wyatt's report was factual, then we should get serious about his site for the Ark. But was Wyatt a trustworthy observer and reporter? Months later I followed up on this story, referring to my long-time friend John Baumgardner, who had personally visited Wyatt's Ark site, and had subjected the whole area to minute scrutiny, including a survey with penetrating radar. When I described to John the eyewitness report of Wyatt, he simply laughed and dismissed the whole thing. He assured me, beyond any doubt, that the Ark site under study revealed no cavitation as described by Wyatt, and that the description given to me was entirely a fabrication.

So there you have it. I am a long-time member of the S.D.A. fraternity, and have a high regard for Scripture and for handling its text in a responsible way. I am embarrassed that Wyatt, who identified himself with my community of faith, should turn out to be an unreliable witness to important archaeological data. I cannot put any confidence in his opinions, his assertions, or his declared eyewitness reports. Yet the man I knew, now at rest, was truly a man of The Word. He knew his Bible, and I heard him give impressive expositions of some difficult passages. In full verbal flight he could be eloquent. I expect his Bible study class was a good one. Yet he was sadly flawed. From close personal acquaintance, I cling to the belief that he was sincere, at the same time as he was woefully mistaken. It was through some quirk of mental dysfunction that he came himself to believe as true certain facts and stories that were his own inventions.​
If you believe words on screen that could have been written by anyone for any motive over video'ed proof and testimony given by lots of people who are shown to say that these events happened and had nothing to gain but a lot to loose, then that just shows your lack of judgement and why you don't believe.

 
Upvote 0

prodromos

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2003
21,601
12,132
58
Sydney, Straya
✟1,182,091.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
If you believe words on screen that could have been written by anyone for any motive over video'ed proof and testimony given by lots of people who are shown to say that these events happened and had nothing to gain but a lot to loose, then that just shows your lack of judgement and why you don't believe.
If you think this is the only reason I believe Ron Wyatt was a fraud, that is severe lack of judgement on your part. You are obviously a big fan of Ron and refuse to listen to anything that reveals what a fraud he was. One day you will open your eyes.
 
Upvote 0

4x4toy

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2014
3,599
1,773
✟116,025.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
"Feigning ignorance" is probably not the right expression. "Exercised discretion" is more accurate.

I think Jesus was a man born of God by a virgin, he was pure and sinless but he also had perfect access to his Father in heaven through prayer and perfect understanding of scripture. IMO Jesus even showed us as a man that we can access God by prayer and studying scripture to know the mind and will of God not only as God but more important for us as man ... I have no problem believing Luke 8:43-48 Jesus was puzzled as a man, but also prayed up and prepared for any situation that could arise, like we're supposed to be as men of God .. .. I prefer that more than Jesus "feigned" ..
 
Upvote 0

4x4toy

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2014
3,599
1,773
✟116,025.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
If you think this is the only reason I believe Ron Wyatt was a fraud, that is severe lack of judgement on your part. You are obviously a big fan of Ron and refuse to listen to anything that reveals what a fraud he was. One day you will open your eyes.

No, you play "tag you're it" .. Show some life instead of tone deaf rhetoric sometimes .. But I appreciate you trying to save us ..
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Guide To The Bible

Guide To The Bible
Jan 23, 2017
1,280
224
Britain
✟31,977.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
If you think this is the only reason I believe Ron Wyatt was a fraud, that is severe lack of judgement on your part. You are obviously a big fan of Ron and refuse to listen to anything that reveals what a fraud he was. One day you will open your eyes.
Unless you can provide counter evidence then you judgement as to what constitutes as evidence is sorely lacking. And therefore Ron was telling the truth.
 
Upvote 0

prodromos

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2003
21,601
12,132
58
Sydney, Straya
✟1,182,091.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Unless you can provide counter evidence then you judgement as to what constitutes as evidence is sorely lacking. And therefore Ron was telling the truth.
"Counter evidence"? I have yet to see any actual evidence from the Ron Wyatt group.
 
Upvote 0

prodromos

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2003
21,601
12,132
58
Sydney, Straya
✟1,182,091.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Found it:
Nope. No Ark of the Covenant shown here. Just Ron's claims that it was. Incredible that no one else involved in the dig saw what Ron claimed to have seen.
And the blood they claim to have found. Where can one see the original lab report? Who did the testing for chromosomes and what are their qualifications for doing such testing. Bold claims require bold evidence yet all we get is hearsay.
 
Upvote 0

Guide To The Bible

Guide To The Bible
Jan 23, 2017
1,280
224
Britain
✟31,977.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Nope. No Ark of the Covenant shown here. Just Ron's claims that it was. Incredible that no one else involved in the dig saw what Ron claimed to have seen.
And the blood they claim to have found. Where can one see the original lab report? Who did the testing for chromosomes and what are their qualifications for doing such testing. Bold claims require bold evidence yet all we get is hearsay.
As I said and as it seems you are slow to grasp:

1. Video proof Ron was digging in the Garden Tomb site between Golgotha and the Tomb, thus showing he had permission to dig and confirming that many others helped him and that this took over three years; Months of digging in the Garden Tomb.

2. The blood tested and verified about on video by many people.

3. We can see and hear all these people doing what they said they did.

4. All Rons other discoveries he found that have been seen and visited by millions of people: Pharaohs chariot wheels in the Gulf of Aqaba, Mount Sinai, Aaron's alter, the rock Moses struck, Sodom & Gomorrah and Noah's Ark.

Where as you on the other hand have some words on a screen written by persons unknown.

But in your mind that all okay. Some how your right and millions of other people are wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4x4toy
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

4x4toy

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2014
3,599
1,773
✟116,025.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
His gentle love, His patience and His humility are clearly portrayed throughout the Gospels. He taught and healed according to their needs, not just their physical but their mental and spiritual as well. Such as when he healed the leper by touching him, a man who had never felt the touch of another human being for as long as he had the disease. Jesus did not need to touch him to heal him, but as he knows the hearts of all men, He knew that this particular man needed something more. Jesus knew the thoughts of the scribes and pharisees yet people think he did not know which woman he had just healed? Clearly He knew her thoughts also because He spoke directly to the thoughts she had before she touched His robe.
What I find odd is that people who presumably have read and reread the Gospels are still ignorant of Christ's motivations. I have no idea how you could be so blind.

There was a lady who went to the Dr for gas , she said Dr. I have gas , I have gas all the time , at work, at church, shopping , even now as I talk to you .. You can't hear them , you can't smell them but gas all the time .. The Dr. looked at her over his glasses , give her some pills and said "come back in a week ..Next week she came back and said Dr !!! , What was those pills , I still have gas all the time but now shoo they stink horrible .. The Dr said good , now that we've fixed your sense of smell , we'll work on your hearing .. ^_^
 
Upvote 0