Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Uh you couldn't be more wrong, schism is Greek and science is Latin, the meanings are vastly different: schism is to separate, schizein (schizophrenia has that root), while science is know, scire, totally different families of language, the closest connection is transliteration and translation over time, which is coincidentalYou know that word ^ and the word "science" are related...it's true...same genome...
That's what happens when one scientizes everything...
That's still a false dichotomy and assuming that the universe is indeterminate in the "chance" insinuation rather than nature not requiring intent to function, that's anthropic principle coloring argumentation too easilyThat's a strange thing to say when we all know it's either created or if it unintentionally emerged somehow.
Uh you couldn't be more wrong, schism is Greek and science is Latin, the meanings are vastly different: schism is to separate, schizein (schizophrenia has that root), while science is know, scire, totally different families of language, the closest connection is transliteration and translation over time, which is coincidental
"schism (n.)
late 14c., scisme, "dissension within the church," from Old French scisme, cisme "a cleft, split" (12c.), from Church Latin schisma, from Greek skhisma (genitive skhismatos) "division, cleft," in New Testament applied metaphorically to divisions in the Church (I Corinthians xii.25), from stem of skhizein "to split" (from PIE root *skei- "to cut, split"). Spelling restored 16c., but pronunciation unchanged. Often in reference to the Great Schism (1378-1417) in the Western Church."
schism | Origin and meaning of schism by Online Etymology Dictionary
"science (n.)
mid-14c., "what is known, knowledge (of something) acquired by study; information;" also "assurance of knowledge, certitude, certainty," from Old French science "knowledge, learning, application; corpus of human knowledge" (12c.), from Latin scientia "knowledge, a knowing; expertness," from sciens (genitive scientis) "intelligent, skilled," present participle of scire "to know," probably originally "to separate one thing from another, to distinguish," related to scindere "to cut, divide," from PIE root *skei- "to cut, split" (source also of Greek skhizein "to split, rend, cleave," Gothic skaidan, Old English sceadan "to divide, separate")."
science | Origin and meaning of science by Online Etymology Dictionary
And the mere sharing of those roots in PIE means what? Nothing. Language evolves, words can have roots without it being some symbolic significance that humans attribute irrationally to it.
If you want to think that science involves schisming, then fine, I admit I schism between what is demonstrably false and what is demonstrably true, because that's knowledge, science, versus belief, rooted in mere faith or trust rather than evidence
"science (n.)
mid-14c., "what is known, knowledge (of something) acquired by study; information;" also "assurance of knowledge, certitude, certainty," from Old French science "knowledge, learning, application; corpus of human knowledge" (12c.), from Latin scientia "knowledge, a knowing; expertness," from sciens (genitive scientis) "intelligent, skilled," present participle of scire "to know," probably originally "to separate one thing from another, to distinguish," related to scindere "to cut, divide," from PIE root *skei- "to cut, split" (source also of Greek skhizein "to split, rend, cleave," Gothic skaidan, Old English sceadan "to divide, separate")."
science | Origin and meaning of science by Online Etymology Dictionary
What is even going on in this wacky thread?
Etymology does not work this way.
Relationships do not entail causal chains in terms of words and their etymology versus usageWords are like trees and people...they can relate...I'm just pointing out some connections.
*Linguistic Apologetics
Relationships do not entail causal chains in terms of words and their etymology versus usage
My point still stands, you can't act like language works in a prescriptivist fashion or shift the goalposts in your favor to act like the way ancient people understood "God" must be how people today understand the same conceptDid you click the link?
Why do atheists even care if we believe? It seems like they are organized and making a joint effort to spread the good news of atheism. I don't get why unless they really do believe that something is wrong with theists.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?