• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Are Christians just Jews with different beliefs?

chevyontheriver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2015
22,369
19,401
Flyoverland
✟1,299,414.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
I am one of those who still studies and values the teaching of the old testament in addition to the new testament. Studing the old testament is now not always so important to some modern day Christians, so not everyone considers it as relevent as it once was. Speaking from my own personal prespective, I also often derive some benefit from reading Jewish thinking and commentries on certain of the old testament scriptures.

This does not make me part of the Jewish religion, as I clearly know what I am and I am a serious and fully commited Christian, but there are parts of Jewish teaching which have significantly influenced my own Christian understanding in what I believe are good ways. As many will already know there are passages in the old testament, which the Jews consider as forbidden pasages and these are forbidden because the speak of the coming of the Messiah.

When Jesus came as the Messiah, He did not fit the ideas and teaching of the ruling Jews of His day and so they rejected Him. The problem partly appears to be talmodic judasim and the talmod originated from the time of the jewish exile in Babilon. In many jewish religion bodies, it seems that the talmod takes presidence of the scriptures, but before the coming of the talmod the teachings of Jesus probably would have been much more easily accepted.

We often read where Jesus quoted poritions of scripture, when rebuking the ruling jews of His day where the Jews would have clearly understood a underlying message which while it would have been clearly understood by them, it could not have been used by them against Jesus, because He was correctly quoting scripture. There is a method of debating between jewish theologians were the question and debate one another and Jesus was doing just this and He was a lot better at this than they were.

Understanding the old testament scriptures and their context with regard to the new testament scriptures is something which I find often enriches how I read and understand the new testament scriptures. The authors of the various books of the new testament, were almost all jews, although Luke was greek.

There are a lot of hebrew idioms in the books of the new testament, which are not always easy to understand in engish translations, because we don't necessarily recognise them for what they are. I am not personally fluent in greek and hebrew, but I have books which enable me to look up the hebraisms in many passages in both testaments.

I think that it is very helpful for each of us to get our heads around the scriptures which we are reading, whch enables us to understand which the different bible authors were seeking to convey! I think that the epistles of Paul are particularly fully of the these hebraisms, which are often used as part of His demonstration of His reasoning, which He was seeking to convey to his readership.
I suspect the folks who consider the OT to be part of a previous dispensation would feel that the OT is just not relevant to Christianity. A sort of historical curiosity only. But this attitude is almost the same as that of Marcion, the early Christian heretic that didn't even accept the OT as any part of Christian Scripture. In response to him the Church accepted the entire OT as Scripture.
 
Upvote 0

tampasteve

Free state of Florida
Christian Forums Staff
Administrator
Site Supporter
May 15, 2017
27,077
7,871
Tampa
✟905,853.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Sorry to have to create a thread here again, this is the only section I was able to create a new thread at, the other forums require "christian" designation, until a moderator changes that for me, I create here. You can move my threads to the right place later if its a problem.
If you make a Ticket HERE we can help out with making the change. But please wait to post new threads until the change is made, this is not the correct forum for threads like these.
 
Upvote 0

BPPLEE

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
15,496
7,208
61
Montgomery
✟240,719.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Sorry to have to create a thread here again, this is the only section I was able to create a new thread at, the other forums require "christian" designation, until a moderator changes that for me, I create here. You can move my threads to the right place later if its a problem.

Well basically, my question is are Christians just Jews with different beliefs? To me it seems that way. I live in Israel and, I'm not really a Jew, but the Family I come from has jewish background. But since Christianity came after Judaism, not before, and Christians are originally Jews who have simply believed Jesus was the Messiah, why arent they called Jews?

Christians still have the same Old testament which Jews follow and believe in, they still believe in heaven/hell, still believe in various Jewish related traditions and behaviors and so on. So I dont understand why arent Christians considered Jews. Christianity itself is originally Judaism except they accepted Jesus as the Messiah. So how did a new religion was created like that? It doesnt look very sensible.

Personally, I think Jews and Christians are almost the same thing. I even heard somewhere Jew+Jesus = Christian. Is that true?

Hope you all can please explain things, thanks.
We are adopted Jews. The Jews are God's chosen people, the true branches. We are grafted onto the vine.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,041
11,755
Georgia
✟1,069,333.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Sorry to have to create a thread here again, this is the only section I was able to create a new thread at, the other forums require "christian" designation, until a moderator changes that for me, I create here. You can move my threads to the right place later if its a problem.

Well basically, my question is are Christians just Jews with different beliefs? To me it seems that way.

Paul said this in Acts 23:
6 But Paul, perceiving that one group were Sadducees and the other Pharisees, began crying out in the Council, “Brothers, I am a Pharisee, a son of Pharisees; I am on trial for the hope and resurrection of the dead!” 7 When he said this, a dissension occurred between the Pharisees and Sadducees, and the assembly was divided. 8 For the Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, nor an angel, nor a spirit, but the Pharisees acknowledge them all. 9 And a great uproar occurred; and some of the scribes of the Pharisaic party stood up and started arguing heatedly, saying, “We find nothing wrong with this man; suppose a spirit or an angel has spoken to him?”

Paul calls the Jews "Brethren" in Acts 13 when in the Synagogue

Moses and Elijah stand with Christ in glory in Matt 17.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
39,212
28,624
Pacific Northwest
✟794,082.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
Sorry to have to create a thread here again, this is the only section I was able to create a new thread at, the other forums require "christian" designation, until a moderator changes that for me, I create here. You can move my threads to the right place later if its a problem.

Well basically, my question is are Christians just Jews with different beliefs? To me it seems that way. I live in Israel and, I'm not really a Jew, but the Family I come from has jewish background. But since Christianity came after Judaism, not before, and Christians are originally Jews who have simply believed Jesus was the Messiah, why arent they called Jews?

Christians still have the same Old testament which Jews follow and believe in, they still believe in heaven/hell, still believe in various Jewish related traditions and behaviors and so on. So I dont understand why arent Christians considered Jews. Christianity itself is originally Judaism except they accepted Jesus as the Messiah. So how did a new religion was created like that? It doesnt look very sensible.

Personally, I think Jews and Christians are almost the same thing. I even heard somewhere Jew+Jesus = Christian. Is that true?

Hope you all can please explain things, thanks.

Historically Judaism in the 2nd Temple Period was fairly diverse. Jewish historians and writers of the first century mention several streams of Jewish religion that existed. The big two were the Pharisees and the Sadducees.

The Pharisees represented what could be described as the ordinary person's Judaism of the time, it was the Judaism of the synagogues, with rabbis as teachers providing guidance to matters of Jewish practice and interpretation of the Torah; they embraced three groups of Scriptures: Torah, Prophets, and Writings (though the exact contents of the Jewish Bible were not yet fully settled). They believed in life after death, resurrection, the coming of the Messiah, and most of the things we usually attribute to Judaism. In fact, the Pharisees were, more-or-less, the only real surviving form of Judaism that continued on after the destruction of the Temple in the first century.

The Sadducees consisted primarily of the Jewish priesthood and Jewish aristocrats, they only accepted the five books of the Torah as being authoritative, and denied the resurrection of the dead, the life of the Age to Come, and things like that. They didn't get along well with the Pharisees, and vice versa, on account of these significant differences. Though they recognized each other as Jewish brothers, Pharisees still attended the Temple for sacrifice and prayer and honored the priesthood which God instituted through Moses' brother Aaron.

Besides these, early Jewish writers like Josephus and Philo of Alexandria mention a few other groups.

The Essenes were an ascetic Jewish sect that tended to keep to themselves in communities. While we don't know for certain, it is usually believed that the community at Qumran that produced the Dead Sea Scrolls were an Essene community. If the Qumran community is representative of the Essenes as a whole, then we know that they practiced intense ritual purification, they regarded the Temple system and priesthood corrupt, and things of that nature.

The Zealots are a group also mentioned as one of the "Big Four" Jewish sects at the time; they were largely inspired by the Maccabeans who had thrown off foreign Greek rule a couple centuries prior and desired to liberate Judea from Roman occupation. The Zealots were largely responsible for several rebellions, including what would become the Jewish-Roman War that ended with the destruction of the Temple by the Romans.

Philo also mentions another group who lived in the region of Elephantine in Egypt called the Therapeutae, who were described as living more ascetic lives. It's possible that the Therapeutae were the closest thing that Judaism ever had to having monks, and it may have been due to Buddhist influence due to Buddhist missionaries which had brought some Buddhist ideas westward from India.

In all of this came Jesus of Nazareth. In most ways Jesus was, theologically, a Pharisee. As much as Jesus speaks negatively about the Pharisees as hypocrites, He also said that they sit in Moses' seat and thus what they say should be listened to. If we believe the Gospel accounts (which I, obviously, do) then Jesus was the Messiah and therefore fulfilled the hopes and expectations of the Messiah; but in such a way that was counter-intuitive and which did not match the expectations of the Pharisees. When Jesus was arrested and crucified, His movement could have ended, as many other would-be messianic movements have; but according to His closest followers He demonstrated His messianic claims by rising from the dead and then ascending into heaven to take His seat as King Messiah at the right hand of God.

As such Christianity can be said to have originated as a distinct and highly unusual messianic sect of Judaism. After all, the chief claim of Christianity is that Jesus is the Messiah, or Hellenized as Christos (Christ in English), and hence the name for His followers and of this religion became known as Christians and Christianity respectively. However, Christianity did not remain a Jewish movement as it quite soon welcomed non-Jewish converts. That's what really began to set it apart from Judaism. To welcome non-Jewish converts who remained non-Jewish (they didn't become Jews though they became Christians) meant a mixed religion of both Jews and Gentiles. And this topic of both Jews and Gentiles comprising covenant people of God through the Messiah who fulfilled and finished the covenantal and prophetic promises of God which are found throughout what Christians call the Old Testament meant that Christianity--even if originally thought of as a Jewish sect--did not remain that way.

With the destruction of the Temple in 70 AD, and the end of the Sadducees, Essenes, and Zealots; leaving only the Pharisees to pick up the pieces and preserve the Jewish faith. The divide between Judaism and Christianity was rather cemented. Judaism was the religion of the Pharisees and the rabbis; Christianity was a distinct religion that had both Jewish and Gentile members; but who regarded themselves not as Jews or Gentiles, but as Christians; something new. A new kind of person whose identity is tied not to their old lives before, but to their new lives as followers of Jesus the Messiah who founded a new way which He called His Church (Greek: ekklesia, literally meaning "called-out assembly") a community, a family, a brother-and-sisterhood of human beings whose identity is found in Jesus.

There were, still are, and always have been Jewish Christians, that is Christians who converted from Judaism or have Jewish heritage. But whether Jew or Gentile, we're Christians. Regardless of where we came from, who we came from, or whatever defined us before; when we were brought through the waters of Baptism, when we were born anew by God's grace and the Holy Spirit and became partakers of Jesus Christ, we became something new. Many Jewish Christians still do treasure their Jewish heritage; just like many Christians from many diverse backgrounds continue to treasure their heritage--so it's not like those things just go away. But it's not about being Jew or being Gentile, or being <fill in the blank here>, it's about being in Jesus Christ.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0

Gregory95

You will know them by their fruits
Jan 15, 2019
859
289
30
missouri
✟45,262.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Sorry to have to create a thread here again, this is the only section I was able to create a new thread at, the other forums require "christian" designation, until a moderator changes that for me, I create here. You can move my threads to the right place later if its a problem.

Well basically, my question is are Christians just Jews with different beliefs? To me it seems that way. I live in Israel and, I'm not really a Jew, but the Family I come from has jewish background. But since Christianity came after Judaism, not before, and Christians are originally Jews who have simply believed Jesus was the Messiah, why arent they called Jews?

Christians still have the same Old testament which Jews follow and believe in, they still believe in heaven/hell, still believe in various Jewish related traditions and behaviors and so on. So I dont understand why arent Christians considered Jews. Christianity itself is originally Judaism except they accepted Jesus as the Messiah. So how did a new religion was created like that? It doesnt look very sensible.

Personally, I think Jews and Christians are almost the same thing. I even heard somewhere Jew+Jesus = Christian. Is that true?

Hope you all can please explain things, thanks.
well one thing you must first set is this....are you speaking of a Hebrew Christian or gentile Christian? for paul tells us the gentiles are not held to the same high expectations...however as paul said this does NOT mean gentiles shouldnt do the law we as gentiles should still STRIVE to establish the law in our lives remember paul lived among the gentiles amd said eat what is put before you so as to not offend UNLESS you KNOW it is to a iDOL.
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
28,197
7,244
North Carolina
✟332,507.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Sorry to have to create a thread here again, this is the only section I was able to create a new thread at, the other forums require "christian" designation, until a moderator changes that for me, I create here. You can move my threads to the right place later if its a problem.

Well basically, my question is are Christians just Jews with different beliefs? To me it seems that way. I live in Israel and, I'm not really a Jew, but the Family I come from has jewish background. But since Christianity came after Judaism, not before, and Christians are originally Jews who have simply believed Jesus was the Messiah, why arent they called Jews?

Christians still have the same Old testament which Jews follow and believe in, they still believe in heaven/hell, still believe in various Jewish related traditions and behaviors and so on. So I dont understand why arent Christians considered Jews. Christianity itself is originally Judaism except they accepted Jesus as the Messiah. So how did a new religion was created like that? It doesnt look very sensible.

Personally, I think Jews and Christians are almost the same thing. I even heard somewhere Jew+Jesus = Christian. Is that true?

Hope you all can please explain things, thanks.
Jews is the name given to the descendants of Jacob.

Everyone else is a Gentile
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
28,197
7,244
North Carolina
✟332,507.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
We are adopted Jews. The Jews are God's chosen people, the true branches. We are grafted onto the vine.
Actually,
1) Jews are the descendants of Jacob,
2) we are adopted sons, not adopted Jews,
3) grafted into God's one people (the one olive tree, the Church) because the Jews were cut off due to unbelief,
4) the destiny of the Jews is to be grafted back into the one olive tree, the Church, IF they do not persist in unbelief. (Romans 11:17, Romans 11:23)
 
Upvote 0

hedrick

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Feb 8, 2009
20,438
10,794
New Jersey
✟1,290,460.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Single
Generally Jews are part of a covenant that includes a number of specific obligations. Most Christians do not consider themselves part of that community, and have not taken on those obligations. There are a few people, generally from Jewish backgrounds, that have. They are arguably both Jewish and Christian, though most Jews don’t accept that. But most of us are not part of that group.

Acts 15 deals with the question of Christian obligation tomJewish law. It imposes only rules that Jews considered were necessary for non Jews. I.e. it acknowledges that many Christians are not Jews. At this point it’s no longer many, but almost all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BPPLEE
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
28,197
7,244
North Carolina
✟332,507.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Generally Jews are part of a covenant that includes a number of specific obligations. Most Christians do not consider themselves part of that community, and have not taken on those obligations. There are a few people, generally from Jewish backgrounds, that have. They are arguably both Jewish and Christian, though most Jews don’t accept that. But most of us are not part of that group.
Acts 15 deals with the question of Christian obligation tomJewish law. It imposes
only rules that Jews considered were necessary for non Jews.
Or Gentile practices, not forbidden in the NT, but particularly repugnant to Jews, causing problems in the Christian fellowship in that province and, therefore, temporarily not allowed; i.e., eating meat with blood still in it.
I.e. it acknowledges that many Christians are not Jews. At this point it’s no longer many, but almost all.
 
Upvote 0

hedrick

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Feb 8, 2009
20,438
10,794
New Jersey
✟1,290,460.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Single
Or Gentile practices, not forbidden in the NT, but particularly repugnant to Jews, causing problems in the Christian fellowship in that province and, therefore, temporarily not allowed; i.e., eating meat with blood still in it.
Yes, that’s probably right. It used to be said thst Acts 15 is based on the Noachide laws, which were what Jews thought Gentiles had to follow. But that’s from my course work in college, many decades ago. Current commentaries refer to rules in Lev 17-18 for Gentiles living in Israel. Apparently the intent is to permit table fellowship, as you say. However Witherington disagrees. He thinks the intent is to prohibit engagement in pagan worship, though he agrees that Lev 17 - 18 provides a background.
 
Upvote 0

Hawkins

Member
Site Supporter
Apr 27, 2005
2,658
413
Canada
✟300,859.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The big picture is, God demonstrated through His chosen people Israel (the Jews) what God's Law could mean, such that today's humans know what God's Grace is through Jesus Christ. God imposed harsh laws to the Jews through the Mosaic covenant which only applicable to the Jews (and some converts). The Jews are thus God's chosen people bearing the responsibility of carrying forward God's message of salvation. They are responsible for standing witness for God, such that God's truth will reach today's humans.

While Christians are today's humans accepting a New Covenant brought us by Jesus Christ. We are the benefited after all is said and done.
 
Upvote 0

AbbaLove

Circumcism Of The Heart
May 16, 2015
2,757
783
✟154,887.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
In Relationship
There is a book by Jewish author Daniel Boyarin that supports the idea that Christianity is a valid sect of Judaism. He believes the Gospels are Jewish and that even the Trinity is validly Jewish and yet Boyarin is not a Christian/Messianic Jew.
Without Judaism - Christianity wouldn't exist. The inspirited 66 books of the Bible were originally penned by Hebrew/Jewish men as instructed by HIS Spirit. Then translated into hundreds of languages for all mankind (men, women, chidren) to digest the Living Word as the Bread of Life.

So, it is no exaggeration to say that all inspirited 66 books are indeed "The Complete Jewish Bible ... https://www.amazon.com/Complete-Jew...77-b9be-0adfd4560fa0&pd_rd_i=1936716844&psc=1

Romans 2:28-29
For he is not a Jew who is so outwardly, neither is circumcision that which is outward in flesh;
but a Jew is he who is so inwardly, and circumcision is of the heart, of Spirit, not in letter, of which the praise is not of men, but of Almighty GOD.

We are adopted Jews. The Jews are God's chosen people, the true branches. We are grafted onto the vine.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BPPLEE
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
39,212
28,624
Pacific Northwest
✟794,082.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
Without Judaism - Christianity wouldn't exist. The inspirited 66 books of the Bible were originally penned by Hebrew/Jewish men as instructed by HIS Spirit. Then translated into hundreds of languages for all mankind (men, women, chidren) to digest the Living Word as the Bread of Life.

So, it is no exaggeration to say that all inspirited 66 books are indeed "The Complete Jewish Bible ... https://www.amazon.com/Complete-Jew...77-b9be-0adfd4560fa0&pd_rd_i=1936716844&psc=1

Romans 2:28-29
For he is not a Jew who is so outwardly, neither is circumcision that which is outward in flesh;
but a Jew is he who is so inwardly, and circumcision is of the heart, of Spirit, not in letter, of which the praise is not of men, but of Almighty GOD.


Just to nitpick: Christians were largely reliant on the Septuagint, which was also a Jewish work. The Septuagint includes books that were ultimately not accepted as part of the Tanakh in post-Temple Judaism (what are usually referred to today as the Deuterocanonical books). When Christianity began, there were still a lot of questions being sorted out among Jews about the books. For example the Sadducees only accepted the five books of the Torah, the community at Qumran (possibly an example of an Essene community) had a lot more books, as can be seen in the Dead Sea Scrolls. The Pharisees, the only Jewish sect to survive the destruction of the Temple, embraced a three-fold division of Scripture consisting of Torah, Prophets, and Writings; but there were legitimate questions still be asked about some books such as the Song of Songs and Daniel.

The question of what books to be accepted also became a question for Christians. Which is why we see disagreements in the early centuries about some books. Which is why, for example, St. Athanasius as late as the 4th century includes Baruch as part of the Old Testament, but rejected Esther.

As such the Jewish Canon and the Christian Canon developed along different trajectories. While the Jewish Canon was largely finalized sometime in the Talmudic period (2nd-3rd centuries); the Christian Canon, both Old and New Testaments, took significantly longer. In fact, as late as the 7th-8th centuries there were still disagreements about the canonical status of the Revelation of St. John (and, notably, the historic Eastern Christian lectionaries don't include readings from the Revelation, but instead the book is read on its own once a year). And what I found fascinating was that John Wycliffe in the 14th century, when he translated the Vulgate into English included the Epistle to the Laodiceans, because it was frequently found in some copies of the Vulgate in the middle ages--even though the work had been regarded as spurious since antiquity.

So when Martin Luther was translating the Bible into German in the 16th century, and he decided to move the Deuterocanonical books to their own section of the Bible as he was of the opinion that they were "not Scripture, but good to read" he was merely engaging in what had been a very longstanding conversation among Christians. Whether Luther's opinion is right or not is open to debate. He was also of the opinion that many of the books of the New Testament Antilegomena weren't Scripture or at least inferior, calling the Epistle of James at one point "an epistle of straw", and was close to completely removing Hebrews, James, Jude, and the Revelation from his German Bible. However, others were able to convince him not to do that, but he still moved all these to the end of his translation, so that Luther's German Bible has a slightly different order for the New Testament books than other Bibles.

Every book which is accepted as Scripture by Christians, regardless of denomination or tradition, was authored by a Jewish person; with the possible exception of the author of Luke-Acts. This also holds true for the Deuterocanonical books.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0
Aug 10, 2019
691
269
56
North Augusta
✟61,068.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
I'd say Christianity is the Hebrew religion (predating the Jewish religion as the Hebrew religion predates Israel), with the anticipated Promise fulfilled. But it is not related directly to Judaism as we know it today (which is neo-Judiasm).
 
Upvote 0

AbbaLove

Circumcism Of The Heart
May 16, 2015
2,757
783
✟154,887.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Just to nitpick: Christians were largely reliant on the Septuagint, which was also a Jewish work.
Not to nitpick, but the 1st century gentile Christians were predominantly reliant on the preaching of the Apostle Paul, the Holy Spirit and digesting Paul's letters with the help of the Holy Spirit. Then along comes religious man (2nd/3rd century) with their theological doctrines so as to organize non-Jewish Christianity

That said i do appreciate your informative historical review of "Christianity" (FWIW).

Just as some think Luke wasn't a Jew (i don't) it's my research belief (due diligence) that Johannes Gutenberg was of Jewish ancestry. Just one of several valid proofs is that his famous Gutenberg Bible has the same number of lines (22) as the popular Ashkenazim Torah. Many Jews at that time converted to the RCC, if only for their own safety and advancement. Even thou he converted to Catholicism the LORD made good use of him. Another interesting note is that the watermark on the pages of his 22 line Bible was that of a cluster of grapes. He was raised in the Jewish community of Gutenberg.

Luke was a Jewish Christian. He may have been lax in ritual observances, but still Jewish. IMO, it's just like gentile (RT) Christians to advance the belief that Luke was non-Jewish.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Aug 10, 2019
691
269
56
North Augusta
✟61,068.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Not to nitpick, but the 1st century gentile Christians were predominantly reliant on the preaching of the Apostle Paul, the Holy Spirit and digesting Paul's letters with the help of the Holy Spirit. Then along comes religious man (2nd/3rd century) with their theological doctrines so as to organize non-Jewish Christianity

That said i do appreciate your informative historical review of "Christianity" (FWIW).

Just as some think Luke wasn't a Jew (i don't) it's my research belief (due diligence) that Johannes Gutenberg was of Jewish ancestry. Just one of several valid proofs is that his famous Gutenberg Bible has the same number of lines (22) as the popular Ashkenazim Torah. Many Jews at that time converted to the RCC, if only for their own safety and advancement. Even thou he converted to Catholicism the LORD made good use of him. Another interesting note is that the watermark on the pages of his 22 line Bible was that of a cluster of grapes. He was raised in the Jewish community of Gutenberg.

Luke was a Jewish Christian. He may have been lax in ritual observances, but still Jewish. IMO, it's just like gentile (RT) Christians to advance the belief that Luke was non-Jewish.
I find it interesting that Paul considered himself an Apostle to the Gentiles as a lot of what we read is addressing the Jewish rejection of Gentiles (and carries a Jewish tone). That said, there are distinctly Gentile audiences at times.

I have considered that Luke (who was not an Apostle) could have been a Hellenistic Jew.

Why are you certain he was not a Gentile?
 
Upvote 0
Aug 10, 2019
691
269
56
North Augusta
✟61,068.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
In Colossians 4, St. Paul mentions distinctly a couple fellow workers who are Jews. He mentions Luke among his fellow workers among the Gentiles.
So the reason is a couple of fellow workers were Jews and Luke was a fellow worker. I guess it is possible.
 
Upvote 0