Dr. D Bunker
Active Member
- Jan 3, 2019
- 230
- 58
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Single
Upvote
0
It is what the Textus Receptus says! Did you even look!
panti panti G3956 a_ Dat Sg m EVERY entire
tw tO G3588 t_ Dat Sg m THE
kosmw kosmO G2889 n_ Dat Sg m SYSTEM world
The word kosmos is used in a variety of ways. The word world IS OFTEN A BAD TRANSLATION. System or "world system" is what the textus uses and it's a very accurate translation...
2889. kosmos kos'-mos probably from the base of 2865; orderly arrangement, i.e. decoration; by implication, the world (in a wide or narrow sense, including its inhabitants, literally or figuratively (morally)):--adorning, world.
Right; and the antecedents of those pronouns are the collective inhabitants of the country or city, not an individual inhabitant.I use the 15th century Textus Receptus. The document those translations likely came from. They may have come from the Latin Vulgate too. This argument has been going on for too long now. Regardless what translation we use, the fact remains that personal pronouns are used in the Textus and other good translations and that implies a PERSON, not a region or entire class of people. The evidence is overwhelming that a person is implied with the word Assyrian.
Ashur is Northern Assyrian/Iraq anyway and it says "on My mountains I tread him down."
Regardless what translation we use, the fact remains that personal pronouns are used in the Textus and other good translations and that implies a PERSON, not a region or entire class of people.
What language was the NT written in? Greek!
A harmonious arrangement is a SYSTEM!
The word KOSMOS has a variety of meanings
and the word world isn't usually the best translation.
Iornament, decoration, adornment, i.e. the arrangement of the stars, 'the heavenly hosts', as the ornament of the heavens. 1 Pet. 3:3
That was one of the problems I came across when translating Revelation some yrs back. For example, the word #3625.Yes, that's what I said.
Generally it is, as long as "world" is primarily understood in a social, rather than an astronomical, sense.
Sennacherib was undoubtedly the occasion of the prophecy in Isaiah 10. But the details in that prophecy go far beyond Sennacherib.Wasn't using 2 kings 19 to prove Sennacherib's existence in Isaiah 10.
The Lord's indignation against His people who dwell “in Zion,” that is, “Jerusalem,” (verse 32) will continue until “the Assyrian” is destroyed.
No hermeneutic equals a perversion of truth.
Colossians 1:23 is another KJV mistranslation. The word WAS was added! If we are to accept that the gospel was preached in all creation by 70 AD we deceive ourselves. If you look at the Textus Receptus, the document the KJV was translated from, you'll see that the word WAS is NOT in the text! This is how it's worded...
If surely you persist to the belief having been grounded and settled and not being removed from the expectation of the well-message/gospel of which ye-hear the one BEING-PROCLAIMED in every creation under the heaven. Look at the link....
http://www.scripture4all.org/OnlineInterlinear/NTpdf/col1.pdf
You quoted Colossians 1:6
6 which has come to you, as it has also in all the world, and is bringing forth fruit, as it is also among you since the day you heard and knew the grace of God in truth;No hermeneutic, NO TRUTH!
AS it HAS in all the world is not correct!
I don't know what translation that is but the KJV is...
Which is come unto you, as it is in all the world; and bringeth forth fruit, as it doth also in you, since the day ye heard of it, and knew the grace of God in truth:
It IS worded "as [it is] in all the world" in the KJV and the Interlinear too!
What you quoted is incorrect! Must be a Preterist perversion.
KJV
Colossians 1:6 Which is come unto you, as [it is] in all the world; and bringeth forth fruit, as [it doth] also in you, since the day ye heard [of it], and knew the grace of God in truth:
This is Colossians 1:6 in the Textus Receptus. (received text)
(Gospel) the one being present into you and being into you according-as in every the system and is being fruit charged according-as and in you from which day ye hear and on-knew the grace of God in truth.
You quote Romans 16:25-26.
I don't know what version you're using but it's worse than the New World Translation!
The Parousia70 perverted translation...
...but now has been made manifest, and by the prophetic Scriptures has been made known to all nations, according to the commandment of the everlasting God, for obedience to the faith;
The KJV
But now is made manifest, and by the scriptures of the prophets, according to the commandment of the everlasting God, made known to all nations for the obedience of faith:
NKJV but now made manifest, and by the prophetic Scriptures made known to all nations, according to the commandment of the everlasting God, for obedience to the faith—
RSV but is now disclosed and through the prophetic writings is made known to all nations, according to the command of the eternal God, to bring about the obedience of faith--
Interlinear...
Yet being manifested now through the injunction of the prophetic scriptures of the everlasting God into obedience of faith into all nations.
You said,
I hope you don't expect anyone to believe that!
The rest of your copy and paste reply, one you've posted dozens of times I'm sure, is an absurdity. There are ways to decipher literalism from symbolism, you haven't attained that virtue yet, I've never know a Preterist that has.
I had one guy tell me that the earthquakes Jesus mentions in Mathew 24 were "the ground shaking events" that occurred in 70 A.D.! I know what level of deception I'm up against.
Already answered in detail, and you have offered no rebuttal.In 70 A.D. There was ONE army that surrounded Jerusalem, the Roman army. Not several armies like those mentioned in Ezekiel 38-39 and Psalm 83.
Already answered in detail, and you have offered no rebuttal.Can any preterist tell me who between 65-70 A.D. were the false Christ that deceive many,
Already answered in detail, and you have offered no rebuttal.What the rumours of wars and wars were between 65-70 A.D.,
Already answered in detail, and you have offered no rebuttal.What nations rose against nations, what kingdoms rose against kingdoms.
Already answered in detail, and you have offered no rebuttal.What famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, took place in divers places.
Already answered in detail, and you have offered no rebuttal.Who it was that was saved by enduring to the end.
Already answered in detail, and you have offered no rebuttal.What or who the abomination was.
Already answered in detail, and you have offered no rebuttal.And how the events of 70 AD were worse than the holocaust.
Already answered in detail, and you have offered no rebuttal.For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.
Already answered in detail, and you have offered no rebuttal.And why the gospel of the kingdom is still being preached in all the world when the word for world is "the inhabited earth"
Already answered in detail, and you have offered no rebuttal.And how the sun and moon were darkened and how “the stars will fall from the sky.”
You really don't like comparing scripture with scripture do you?In verse 30 He mentions “the Son of Man coming on the clouds of the sky.”
Matthew 24:33-34
33 “Even so you too, when you see these things, recognize that He is near, right at the door. 34 Truly I say to you, this generation [What generation? the generation who, in v. 33, sees “all” those things] will not pass away until all these things take place.”
The context of the chapter MUST be understood as an answer to this three part question, and NOT ONLY the stones falling (when shall these things be) as Preterist would like you to believe.
The temple was burned and stones from it and several other buildings on the Temple Mount still stood for up to 300 years after 70 AD.
Catholic's typically take the historical view. Are you in that crowd or have you accepted the Preterist view?
This is not even approximately an answer to anything I said in the post you are supposedly answering. Instead of answering it, you are, as usual, trying to change the subject. No Sale.Who are the Lord's people, today and in the future?
1Jn 2:22 Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.
1Jn 2:23 Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: (but) he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also.
2Jn 1:7 For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.
2Jn 1:8 Look to yourselves, that we lose not those things which we have wrought, but that we receive a full reward.
2Jn 1:9 Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.
2Jn 1:10 If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed:
2Jn 1:11 For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.
One of the men in the video below resides in the modern State of Israel.
Can you explain why this Christian television program is featuring a Christ-rejecting Orthodox Jew, based on the scripture found above?
Is this man under a different covenant with God, based on who his parents would be?
.