Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Wrong! "Pas" in vs. 49 does not refer to all mankind. It refers to the subject of vss. 47, 48 "all" who are thrown into hell. The righteous are not thrown into hell. Not one single verse clearly says the righteous are thrown into hell or pass through any fire.Well, our redeemer said, "Everyone will be salted with fire." That includes me and you.
Mark 9:47-49
And if your eye causes you to stumble, pluck it out. It is better for you to enter the kingdom of God with one eye than to have two eyes and be thrown into hell, 48 where
“‘the worms that eat them do not die,
and the fire is not quenched.’
49 Everyone will be salted with fire.
you know that the doctrine you peddle is so bad it only started recently and you are afraid of truth.
Probably the best verse to refute the idea that God, in the end, will unite all of the damned to Himself and bring them to paradise to be fully consecrated to His love is Matthew 25:46 which says, “And these shall go into everlasting punishment: but the just, into life everlasting.” Thomas Aquinas, when speaking of the eternal out of hell says this: “It is written (Mt. 25:46) of the elect conjointly with the damned: "These shall go into everlasting punishment: but the just, into life everlasting." But it is inadmissible that the life of the just will ever have an end. Therefore it is inadmissible that the punishment of the damned will ever come to an end.” In other words, if Jesus correlates between the eternity of the blessed in heaven and the eternity of the damned in hell then grammatically it means that both will last for eternity. How so? Because when Christ compares them both as being equal it’s logical to conclude that both sides will suffer the same effect. If the just shall be in heaven for eternity then the damned must also be in hell for eternity since the grammar requires it to be so.
Probably the best verse to refute the idea that God, in the end, will unite all of the damned to Himself and bring them to paradise to be fully consecrated to His love is Matthew 25:46 which says, “And these shall go into everlasting punishment: but the just, into life everlasting.” Thomas Aquinas, when speaking of the eternal out of hell says this: “It is written (Mt. 25:46) of the elect conjointly with the damned: "These shall go into everlasting punishment: but the just, into life everlasting." But it is inadmissible that the life of the just will ever have an end. Therefore it is inadmissible that the punishment of the damned will ever come to an end.” In other words, if Jesus correlates between the eternity of the blessed in heaven and the eternity of the damned in hell then grammatically it means that both will last for eternity. How so? Because when Christ compares them both as being equal it’s logical to conclude that both sides will suffer the same effect. If the just shall be in heaven for eternity then the damned must also be in hell for eternity since the grammar requires it to be so.
What you have pointed out is a truth that the true believer cannot get past.
Those who choose to ignore it have rejected the truth for a lie of philosophy.
It raises the question, do these people understand the mercy and Grace of God?
The answer is a definite NO! They have filled their heads with ancient religious philosophy rather than the Word of God.
They continuously take scripture out of context to support their heresy and don't even care that they are doing so.
That's fine, universalist will not get in heaven because universalism is demonic
Your statement seems contradictory. Can you clarify it?Will you deny it’s the fault of the sinner that he is damned? We sin by virtue of our own will. This is why Spurgeon said that free will has lead a many to hell. Unless by divine grace God moves the will of the sinner towards Him the sinner will die in his sins not through defect of God’s mercy, but by their own selves. God predestines no one to be damned, only we do.
On what does your salvation rest?That's fine, universalist will not get in heaven because universalism is demonic
And what if the sense in which 'aionion' is used there is to denote 'otherworldly', 'afterlife' or 'the age to come', or used in a qualitative spiritual sense? There are various instances in the NT of this interesting Greek word being translated in these ways. Saint F.L. I think has several filing cabinets full of scholarship on the term.
And what if 'kolasis' is used to mean 'corrective punishment'? It is distinguished from that other Greek word for retributive punishment 'timoria', which Clement of Alexandria remarked was never found in the NT. And corrective punishment has an object, a telos, does it not? To chastise, discipline, correct, set right, make righteous.
So we have a possible (albeit unwieldy) construction - corrective punishment in the next world v life in the next world.
Regardless, Jesus (a) often employs hyperbole and prophetic rhetoric to get the message across to dimwits and (b) is warning that ppl are indeed in danger of becoming so pitiless that 'forever' won't be enough time to fix them.
Consider Jesus' treatment of Gehenna fire as being good salting for everyone (Mk 9:47-49), severe discipline for the vicious (Mt 5:22) and where God refrains from destroying ppl out of an abundance of love (Mt 10:28-31).
So do you believe there are nuts too tough for God to crack?
That's a very uninformed view.So all you can do is that? Because you know that the doctrine you peddle is so bad it only started recently and you are afraid of truth. May God forgive you for the evil you are trying to put forward
That means a lot coming from those who believe God would burn his own children. What sort of father would do that?It raises the question, do these people understand the mercy and Grace of God?
That means a lot coming from those who believe God would burn his own children. What sort of father would do that?
Aren't we ALL saints?Dear Shrewd: Much thanks for your "saint" graduation, (LOL),
Jesus paid the consequences of sin on the cross. The consequence of sin is death. He saved us from death.More proof that you don't understand the consequences of sin, which means you cannot understand the Mercy and Grace of God.
More proof that you don't understand the consequences of sin, which means you cannot understand the Mercy and Grace of God.
Especially from a God who requires us to forgive our enemies.
That means a lot coming from those who believe God would burn his own children. What sort of father would do that?