- Aug 8, 2014
- 2,876
- 4,623
- 56
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Married
So I have heard a defense of the use of icons put forward that they somewhat continue the use of the images used on the Ark of the Covenant and in the Tabernacle and Temples. These seem from the Old Testament to have been metal castings/carvings, more similar to statues than the painted icons in use today.
And yet, it seems that the Orthodox condemn Roman Catholic statuary used in Western worship. Why does Orthodoxy approve of painted icons, but not statuary icons?
Is this condemnation from the fact that they are statues? Is it the theology behind them that is wrong (from an Orthodox perspective)? Is it the images portrayed by the statues? Is it because the story told by a painted icon is deeper and different than that found in a statue?
(As always, I am asking in genuine desire for teaching, not to be contrary, argumentative or debating...)
(Edited to fix a grammatical error)
And yet, it seems that the Orthodox condemn Roman Catholic statuary used in Western worship. Why does Orthodoxy approve of painted icons, but not statuary icons?
Is this condemnation from the fact that they are statues? Is it the theology behind them that is wrong (from an Orthodox perspective)? Is it the images portrayed by the statues? Is it because the story told by a painted icon is deeper and different than that found in a statue?
(As always, I am asking in genuine desire for teaching, not to be contrary, argumentative or debating...)
(Edited to fix a grammatical error)
Last edited: