I got some time and I'm in the mood for comedy. My comments as i go:
1:50 Clicky line machine. But "LINES ARE THERE!" No idea what this means.
4:00 flood mythologies are common in mythologies: Irrelevant. The central point of the peice is not that floods happen, but that one specific flood happened and that it left evidence which they have discovered. If I'm trying to prove that Billy stole my bike, I need to demonstrate that billy has a bike, that that bike is the same bike which I formerly had, and that it got there via theft. Saying, "lots of bikes are stolen every year!" is irrelevant.
8:40 Well, they just identified that lots of fake claims have been made.
10:40 getting bored.
12:32 evidence of a massive flood,
13:00 a planet sized object passing near enough to cause planet wide floods? No ship would survive such waters. I'm also wondering what such a flyby would do to the atmosphere.
20:00 "examined with a metal detector" Hmm, ark was made of wood. "man made alloys" which ones?
20:30 something that looks kind of like an anchor stone not by the supposed find? Oh, I mean a bunch of such stones, because there were a bunch of arks? A bunch of anchors for one ark that all got up and walked off?
25:00 BORED get to the data.
31:00 "molecular frequency generator discriminator" "no one knows how it works" let me google that: Ah, they are the same bogus devices that were sold as "bomb detectors" and have never been shown to reliably detect anything better than random chance.
Explosive detection - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Basically, dowsing reveals patterns that the dowser wanted to reveal. Wow, shocking...
33:30 looks like a iron ore rock to me.
34:50 Ooo! radar! That's apparently the clicky line thing. apparently lines are there, but we are never told anything else about this test. but, um, lines are there?
40:00 moon pool. I'm assuming Noah didn't construct airlocks, meaning that the ship would need some alternate source of bouancy than the air withing the vessel. The proposed shape does not seem to provide that.
42:30 They show drawings of their proposed shape, but not any evidence that it is born out by the formation.
Ok, I'm done. Basically, it breaks down to "hey, we will use questionable methods to get the results we want then claim those results we wanted support the conclusions we already came to!"
Can't believe I wasted an hour of my life.