Another Flood Question

[pitabread]

You cant prove it

I have zero interest in debating a flat Earther about whether or not the Earth is round.

 

[USincognito]

Carnal people are carnal. They like sin and money, they like idolatry, boasting of flesh in the Law even if they're religious or atheist. Who says he isn't good...or smart...or if he doesn't say he's smart he says he's humble...if he doesn't say he's clean he boasts of being filthy
Do you know why sinners don't read the Bible properly and can't?

What does this have to do with whether there is any scientific evidence for the Flood?

 

[USincognito]

I see all kinds of documentaries and scientific articles where scientists support the idea of a global flood.

Could you cite or link to one or two?

 

[USincognito]

The evidence is the Bible.

No, the evidence is the geological record, which unequivocally shows that no Flood happened.

 

[USincognito]

Nice one on Netflix right now... "Is Genesis History?"

Oh my. That's more of a Creationist echo chamber than an actual documentary.

 

[I'm_Sorry]

I have zero interest in debating a flat Earther about whether or not the Earth is round.

And that's why you will hold onto that the whole earth cant be flooded.

The text books you rely on are apart of the false paradigm.

Until you, yourself, get up into the heights of where a rocket can take you, you will always rely on the screen (TV, PC monitor) or a sanctioned text book to accept so called reality, or the mathematical equations within the false paradigm.

Stale mate.

 

[USincognito]

Flerf is off topic. If you want to discuss it, start your own thread.

 

[AV1611VET]

No, the evidence is the geological record, which unequivocally shows that no Flood happened.

Science can't prove a negative.

Except when the Bible is involved, then science will make an exception ... won't it?

 

[I'm_Sorry]

Flerf is off topic. If you want to discuss it, start your own thread.

Its the fundamental truth, that destroys the false claim of (no world wide flood)

All the evidence for a flood is discarded due to mathematical equations within the false paradigm.

The pretence that the earth is a globe orbiting the sun.

When the exact opposite is true.

 

[JackRT]

No, the evidence is the geological record, which unequivocally shows that no Flood happened.

And that geological record was written long long before the human stories in the Bible. It is only in the past two or three centuries that humanity has actually begun to be able to read that geological record.

 

[I'm_Sorry]

And that geological record was written long long before the human stories in the Bible. It is only in the past two or three centuries that humanity has actually begun to be able to read that geological record.

Geology is within the false paradigm.

The dating of the earth is determined by the comparison of earth rocks and fake moon rocks.

The masons went to the moon in a hollywood basement.

 

[I'm_Sorry]

Geology relies on heliocentricm.

 

[inquiring mind]

Could you cite or link to one or two?

Nice documentary quoted in post #24. Discussions with all kinds of Phd types.

 

[JackRT]

I sometimes despair of the human race and its capacity for self delusion.

 

[I'm_Sorry]

I sometimes despair of the human race and its capacity for self delusion.

And what is the delusion you refer to?

 

[I'm_Sorry]

"So far scientists have not found a way to determine the exact age of the Earth directly from Earth rocks because Earth's oldest rocks have been recycled and destroyed by the process of plate tectonics. If there are any of Earth's primordial rocks left in their original state, they have not yet been found. Nevertheless, scientists have been able to determine the probable age of the Solar System and to calculate an age for the Earth by assuming that the Earth and the rest of the solid bodies in the Solar System formed at the same time and are, therefore, of the same age. "

Geologic Time: Age of the Earth

What is the pretence in the above?

Is it a solar system? (heliocentricm)

 

[JackRT]

And what is the delusion you refer to?

I refer to those delusions that are based in a rejection of reality.

Dr. M. Scott Peck --- "One should accept reality no matter the consequences."

 

[I'm_Sorry]

I refer to those delusions that are based in a rejection of reality.

Dr. M. Scott Peck --- "One should accept reality no matter the consequences."

What is reality truly?

God did it, or not?

 

[AV1611VET]

I refer to those delusions that are based in a rejection of reality.

For 76 years reality included Pluto as our 9th planet, didn't it?

Anyone creating a model of our solar system for a science fair should have included it, should they not?

And it's a fact that scientists included it in the Arecibo message, didn't they?

 

[JackRT]

For 76 years reality included Pluto as our 9th planet, didn't it?

Anyone creating a model of our solar system for a science fair should have included it, should they not?

And it's a fact that scientists included it in the Arecibo message, didn't they?

It is nothing more than a matter of classification.