Another Flood Question

[Speedwell]

You don't think one credible scientist would have stepped forward and suggested this possibility, in the absence of the biblical account.

Not a chance.

 

[Subduction Zone]

The evidence is the Bible.
Science can run around and find details that indicate things...but as the trail goes along even if someone reads the data as if it disproves the Bible....wait and see some more evidence

Do you know how dumb most doctors and weathermen and all sorts of PhD people are
Of course if all you've ever seen is that bar/level we call it "smart" in context of that realm
Researchers, college professors, presidents....seem like monkeys hitting tools around trying to get a piece right (and they claim evolution is true at that)

Sorry, that is not evidence. You are trying to use circular reasoning. If you want to claim that the Bible is true you cannot use the Bible to support that claim.

I could claim that I am the smartest person in the world and defend that claim by referring to the fact that I said it. Not very convincing.

Lastly you should not be putting educated people down. Since they are probably far "smarter" than you are you are merely insulting yourself when you do so.

 

[christianforumsuser]

Then if you wanna prove your thoughts true why use your thoughts
Or prove your science true why use your science

 

[inquiring mind]

For example? (just a sample of examples will be sufficient).

However, you can find someone to support almost any exotic claim; if they're said to be, or call themselves, scientists, it's worth double-checking their credentials and remembering the being a scientist is only significant if the field they're commenting on is their field of speciality.

Nice one on Netflix right now... "Is Genesis History?"

 

[Winken]

If the account of the Worldwide Flood wasn’t in Genesis... would it be a conventional scientific theory today?

It IS in the account!!

 

[christianforumsuser]

"Lastly you should not be putting educated people down. Since they are probably far "smarter" than you are you are merely insulting yourself when you do so."

 

[I'm_Sorry]

The earth is not in a solar (sun centre) system. (heliocentric)

The earth is at the centre of creation. (geocentric)

The earth is flat and motionless. (sun created on day 4 in the firmament)

The windows of the heaven (firmament) opened up and flooded the circle of the earth.

The sun and the moon are smaller and closer (in the firmament).

Believe the bible not the global deception.

Genesis 1:14-19

14 And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:

15 And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.

16 And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.

17 And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth,

18 And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good.

19 And the evening and the morning were the fourth day.

 

[AV1611VET]

If the account of the Worldwide Flood wasn’t in Genesis... would it be a conventional scientific theory today?

No.

 

[JackRT]

No.

Well, this is a red letter day. We agree.

 

[christianforumsuser]

If people thought it disproved God, maybe.
But as it's written in the Bible people who refuse to be truly born again in their arrogance have the bias to side against such if they see it as an enemy

Why do you think people don't like the arrogant religious people
What does the Bible say
Or what about why religious people like spreading their thoughts ad culture even as it strays from the Bible doesn't it

 

[AV1611VET]

Well, this is a red letter day. We agree.

I'd like to point out though, that the Flood is mentioned in other books of the Bible besides Genesis.

So Christians would still believe in it, but not as detailed.

 

[pitabread]

You don't think one credible scientist would have stepped forward and suggested this possibility, in the absence of the biblical account.

No, because there is no evidence to suggest there ever was a world wide flood.

 

[I'm_Sorry]

No, because there is no evidence to suggest there ever was a world wide flood.

No evidence that fits the accepted paradigm.

Reminds me of this game I was just playing:

 

[pitabread]

No evidence that fits the accepted paradigm.

By the accepted paradigm, you mean reality? Because yes, there is no evidence for the world wide flood that fits reality.

 

[I'm_Sorry]

By the accepted paradigm, you mean reality? Because yes, there is no evidence for the world wide flood that fits reality.

That the earth is a globe (sphere)

 

[christianforumsuser]

Oh hush. You say no evidence as you haven't looked and can't see it. What kind of scientist is that
You see something you don't wanna admit and then say "where's the evidence"
If you want evidence you can recognize you might have to be patient

 

[christianforumsuser]

You could have witness of much greater disaster, but I'd hope you'd repent

 

[pitabread]

That the earth is a globe (sphere)

That the Earth is a sphere is also part of reality, yes.

 

[I'm_Sorry]

That the Earth is a sphere is also part of reality, yes.

You cant prove it, your perspective relies on corporations who have the money to make (pretty poor) CGI and rockets that go up and always come back down.

Low earth orbit is all they can do. (and that's being generous)

There is no punching through the firmament.

God Sits on His throne above the glassy sea in the 3rd heaven.

Revelation 4:6

 

[I'm_Sorry]