Another Example of Intolerable Extremists

[BCP1928]

You first.

Why me? I don't think that Christianity offers an objective definition of obscene.

 

[o_mlly]

Why me? I don't think that Christianity offers an objective definition of obscene.

I don't think you do either. Prove me wrong.

 

[BCP1928]

I don't think you do either. Prove me wrong.

Wrong about what? That there is no objective definition of obscenity? You can believe there is an objective definition you like, but if you want to impose it on anyone else you must first show it to be objective.

 

[Bradskii]

Probably. However, no sense in continuing if you will not give us your objective definition of "obscene".

There is no objective definition. What I deem obscene and what you might deem the same will often align. But where we differ will be a matter of personal interpretation. But again, I saw nothing last week that a reasonable person could define as obscene. You included. But then I'm stretching the definition of 'reasonable' now.

 

[The Barbarian]

Barbarian suggests:
"Anger is weapon only in the hand of your opponent."
Calm yourself and learn from this.

He can't and won't. He's a candidate for being ignored on account of wanton narcissism and ignorance.

I've seen worse people change and become good participants. Patience.

 

[FreeinChrist]

ADVISOR HAT


Knock it off with the flaming, folks!
Don't make us thread ban you. ​

 

[HARK!]

MOD HAT ON

MOD HAT OFF​

 

[HARK!]

MOD HAT ON

Due to multiple rule violations:

MOD HAT OFF​