As another poster said, where are the sources? And I wasn't aware they had found bones belonging to Jesus. Anyway Jesus ascended to heaven you know? No Body, no bones.
If they found his bones that means Christ was not the son of god and it doesn't matter anyway does it? It doesn't actually matter what his race was anyway, I'll talk about that at the end of the article.
Even if someone has claimed that they have found Jesus' bones, I don't know how they could prove it was jesus after 2000 years.
As I said I haven't heard about them finding his bones, this sounds like a simple lie to me.
Right at the start this destroys any possiblity that the article has any truth in it at all, but let's continue to analyse it.
"This Statements That Are Being Said Are Not Racist Especially When It Is Caucasians Who Are Finding These Facts"
"It was caucaians who uncovered this information and made it public , therefore it Cannot Be Taken As Racism"
"Now That White People Are Finally Admitting That Yashua , Isa , Jesus Was Undoubtedly Nubians / Blacks Negroid . Maybe Now You Will Believe It ;..."
It seems to think that it has more credibility if it claims these comments are made by white people, even if they are, so what? White people who looking at the plight of African-Americans descide that if they convince the general public he was black, perhaps more respect will be given to the African-American community? Who knows what their intentions were if this is even true, which I highly doubt.
"A Caucasian Theologian also agrees that Yashua , Isa , Jesus was a Nubian / Black / Negroid / man with short , Afro - Hair and a short black beard"
They could tell all this from the skull they found could they?
"The people who call themselves Israelis Today Are Not The Original People From Israel . The Round WaSkull s The Kind Of Face That You Find In North Africa , Egypt . These Are The Features Of Nubia In Sudan And Egypt, Those people you see in Egypt today are not the Indigenous Nubians / Blacks / Negroids."
This reveals some of the author's bias, as far as I know the anchient egyptians emigrated from the medditarreanean and were caucasian as the author stated, but there were no or very few blacks in egypt when they arrived or anywhere above the sahara. As they progressed further up the nile they encoutered blacks.
I believe blacks became part of the egyptian soceity, certainly from art works/statues from the time the people depicted had african and caucasian features, certainly the author's assertion that they were ALL black is false.
Of Course, most people who now live in Israel are jews who have immigrated from all over the world. But again the author asserts that at the time of jesus a huge amount were black or they were all black? Later he asserts that the original tribe of abraham were all black aswell?
"He Was Dark - Skinned With Nappy Hair , like all the original tribes of Abraham"
Oh, there were all black were they? Not just jesus, but all of them?
"This Is The Time Of The Harvest And The Holy Seed , The Lost Sheep Of The House Of Israel Matthew 10 ; 5 - 6 ;... The Tribe Of Judah Must Be Called . We Are A Visble Image Of Our Invisible Heavenly Father."
Again what is this about? Blacks are more holy than other races? Blacks are a 'visible image of our inivisible heavenly father'?
More of the author's biased revealed.
"Jesus Was Undoubtedly Nubians / Blacks Negroid . Maybe Now You Will Believe It ;..."
Undoubtedly huh? That's a strong word, this reveals how SURE the author is that Jesus was black, or how much we wants him to have been black.
This article seems to have been written by a black supremist or something. It is not written in a fair critical way, but with a preconcieved viewpoint.
I don't think we should argue about what Jesus looked liked, and due to the amount of evidence that exists, it's possible he could have been Arab, Jewish, Black, in fact it's possible he could have been anything, we just don't know. Other posters have put reasons for why they believe he may be a particular race, but it's all speculation, we simply don't know.
The reason I attacked this article is because it seems to be lies and to be asserting that blacks are somehow better or more holy, but we are all equal before god. I think lies like this should be attacked.
As another poster said I think we can all think of Jesus as our own race if it helps us, In Africa they have pictures of Jesus as completely black in Europe and the USA he is pictured as being white, in asia is he pictured with asian features, etc. And this is fine.
Racism is still a big problem in the world today, many have died and suffered and continue to die and suffer, and I don't think trying to put a race on Jesus is a good idea.
Perhaps the reason for there being no evidence of what jesus looked like is because he wouldn't want us associating him with any one race, he died for all, every single person on earth of every colour and nationality.
If they found his bones that means Christ was not the son of god and it doesn't matter anyway does it? It doesn't actually matter what his race was anyway, I'll talk about that at the end of the article.
Even if someone has claimed that they have found Jesus' bones, I don't know how they could prove it was jesus after 2000 years.
As I said I haven't heard about them finding his bones, this sounds like a simple lie to me.
Right at the start this destroys any possiblity that the article has any truth in it at all, but let's continue to analyse it.
"This Statements That Are Being Said Are Not Racist Especially When It Is Caucasians Who Are Finding These Facts"
"It was caucaians who uncovered this information and made it public , therefore it Cannot Be Taken As Racism"
"Now That White People Are Finally Admitting That Yashua , Isa , Jesus Was Undoubtedly Nubians / Blacks Negroid . Maybe Now You Will Believe It ;..."
It seems to think that it has more credibility if it claims these comments are made by white people, even if they are, so what? White people who looking at the plight of African-Americans descide that if they convince the general public he was black, perhaps more respect will be given to the African-American community? Who knows what their intentions were if this is even true, which I highly doubt.
"A Caucasian Theologian also agrees that Yashua , Isa , Jesus was a Nubian / Black / Negroid / man with short , Afro - Hair and a short black beard"
They could tell all this from the skull they found could they?
"The people who call themselves Israelis Today Are Not The Original People From Israel . The Round WaSkull s The Kind Of Face That You Find In North Africa , Egypt . These Are The Features Of Nubia In Sudan And Egypt, Those people you see in Egypt today are not the Indigenous Nubians / Blacks / Negroids."
This reveals some of the author's bias, as far as I know the anchient egyptians emigrated from the medditarreanean and were caucasian as the author stated, but there were no or very few blacks in egypt when they arrived or anywhere above the sahara. As they progressed further up the nile they encoutered blacks.
I believe blacks became part of the egyptian soceity, certainly from art works/statues from the time the people depicted had african and caucasian features, certainly the author's assertion that they were ALL black is false.
Of Course, most people who now live in Israel are jews who have immigrated from all over the world. But again the author asserts that at the time of jesus a huge amount were black or they were all black? Later he asserts that the original tribe of abraham were all black aswell?
"He Was Dark - Skinned With Nappy Hair , like all the original tribes of Abraham"
Oh, there were all black were they? Not just jesus, but all of them?
"This Is The Time Of The Harvest And The Holy Seed , The Lost Sheep Of The House Of Israel Matthew 10 ; 5 - 6 ;... The Tribe Of Judah Must Be Called . We Are A Visble Image Of Our Invisible Heavenly Father."
Again what is this about? Blacks are more holy than other races? Blacks are a 'visible image of our inivisible heavenly father'?
More of the author's biased revealed.
"Jesus Was Undoubtedly Nubians / Blacks Negroid . Maybe Now You Will Believe It ;..."
Undoubtedly huh? That's a strong word, this reveals how SURE the author is that Jesus was black, or how much we wants him to have been black.
This article seems to have been written by a black supremist or something. It is not written in a fair critical way, but with a preconcieved viewpoint.
I don't think we should argue about what Jesus looked liked, and due to the amount of evidence that exists, it's possible he could have been Arab, Jewish, Black, in fact it's possible he could have been anything, we just don't know. Other posters have put reasons for why they believe he may be a particular race, but it's all speculation, we simply don't know.
The reason I attacked this article is because it seems to be lies and to be asserting that blacks are somehow better or more holy, but we are all equal before god. I think lies like this should be attacked.
As another poster said I think we can all think of Jesus as our own race if it helps us, In Africa they have pictures of Jesus as completely black in Europe and the USA he is pictured as being white, in asia is he pictured with asian features, etc. And this is fine.
Racism is still a big problem in the world today, many have died and suffered and continue to die and suffer, and I don't think trying to put a race on Jesus is a good idea.
Perhaps the reason for there being no evidence of what jesus looked like is because he wouldn't want us associating him with any one race, he died for all, every single person on earth of every colour and nationality.
Upvote
0
