Subduction Zone
Regular Member
From gradyll's quote of a creationist source:
This is of course incorrect. We are not assuming present day time rates. Those have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. In fact deep time was well accepted as a scientific concept well before Darwin's time. As usual creationists sties cannot be honest. That is because the ridiculous claims they have to make for a flood have no supporting evidence and can be debunked with the wave of a hand.
What they are asserting is that there wasn't enough water to cover the
present-day mountains. This is fallacious because they are presuming
evolutionary time scales for the rates of the mountains forming that
is, millions of years. This means that the mountains we have today
would have been nearly identical in height just 4,500 years ago at the
time of the Flood. This is begging the question because the premise of
their argument assumes long ages are true in order to argue that long
ages are true (and, thus, that the Flood could not have happened).
This is of course incorrect. We are not assuming present day time rates. Those have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. In fact deep time was well accepted as a scientific concept well before Darwin's time. As usual creationists sties cannot be honest. That is because the ridiculous claims they have to make for a flood have no supporting evidence and can be debunked with the wave of a hand.
Upvote
0