Amil or Pretrib - which is biblical?

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,784.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

With this type of loose adhoc hermeneutics you could literally make the Bible say anything. Obviously you have nothing to support your theology. There is no passage that supports your paradigm. You are manipulating the sacred text to support your personal purposes.

2+2=4, not 22.
 
Reactions: Spiritual Jew
Upvote 0

Dkh587

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 6, 2014
3,049
1,770
Southeast
✟552,407.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Do you have your own website, or know of a website that has an organized collection of amillenial teachings?
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,784.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Do you have your own website, or know of a website that has an organized collection of amillenial teachings?

I am planning for an end-time site in the future. I have the material. I am just waiting the opportunity. I have many books at various stages of completion on the go. I do plan to publish in the future.

I recommend:

http://www.mountainretreatorg.net/eschatology.html
 
Reactions: Dkh587
Upvote 0

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2020
9,318
568
56
Mount Morris
✟125,359.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married

Judging the world in righteousness is not necessarily all the dead suspended before the GWT outside of creation. Judging the world in righteousness is the act of the church being glorified, while those on earth look on, with a new ability to see all of creation both spiritual and physical. Especially at the point where the Lord is going to intervene in Jerusalem being attacked by many nations.

Jesus is coming in fire to burn up the works of man and all this is just the beginning of sorrow for those on the earth. Since the church was just glorified, it can no longer be a part of the tribulation of the final harvest.

The Second Coming is not even the point of individual judgments. When you say "day of judgment", you are meaning when all individuals have to give account for themselves. At the Second Coming, all on earth will be trying to hide under rocks/rubble, and in caves. They are not killed then, nor rounded up to stand before the GWT. They are very much alive, because the final harvest can only start after the angels arrive with the Lamb.

How can you have all the angels and the 6 Trumpets and 7 Thunders all over in hours? There is no warning prelude of judgment going on warning when the Second Coming will happen. At the least will be an announcement on the news that a multi national coalition is about to end the conflict in the ME. The Second Coming is Jesus coming to stop this attack. That is when the Mount of Olives is cut in half. So the Mount of Olives is not burned up, but people will be trying to escape, and Satan even sends a flood of water. That is why this is a literal righteousness judgment. All on earth will see the conflict literally between Christ and Satan.

Personal individual judgments happen after the Second Coming.


The hour already started with Lazarus literally being physically resurrected, the first resurrection, over which the second death has no power. Physical resurrection is ongoing. I guess even futurist do not agree on that point. The dead in Christ have been rising first since Lazarus. But the Cross was the last day resurrection for the OT redeemed, waiting in Abraham's bosom. Those souls were afforded the first resurrection, a physical body, which the second death has no power over. All in heaven literally have permanent physical bodies. That is taking these verses literally. Because if you think it is a spiritual birth into the family of God that is viewing these verses as figurative and symbolic of another resurrection altogether. Once again not the GWT where each individual is judged and those judged there are the dead. They are literally physically and spiritually dead.

The living are not even at that judgment.

Since the Cross was future to John 5, that final hour would be the Cross. God judged the sins of the world. All who are righteous in God's sight would forever be righteous. The ungodly who would reject this Atonement would always receive eternal damnation. So is the point about judgment or a resurrection? After the Cross, the redeemed never tasted death. If they never die, how can they ever be resurrected? Dying is tasting death. Literally the redeemed do not physically die. The soul just moves from one physical body to the next permanent physical body. The dead, remain as souls in sheol until the GWT.


Because the Second Coming is not the point where all flesh just up and dies. You keep leaving out the angels during the Trumpets and Thunders. What about taking Matthew 13:37-43 literally?


There has to be a defined period when the angels are here for the final harvest. John wrote over 10 chapters defining more than just a 12 hour period of righteousness being shown in full force on the world.

This time of change cannot happen over night. There is literally not a single verse in 2 Peter 3 where all the wicked on earth are instantly killed at the Second Coming. The chapter does not even say humans are burned up.

"the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up."

Humans are not works. This literally says only the works of humans are burned up. In fact a verse does point out:

"not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance."

Christ on earth as Prince will offer many chances for repentance, so killing them off instantly goes against the very nature of the Second Coming, and God's longsuffering towards humanity.



What is the point of a rapture if all are standing at the GWT?

You have the glorified redeemed in limbo between Paradise and the New Jerusalem.
 
Upvote 0

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2020
9,318
568
56
Mount Morris
✟125,359.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Speaking of human opinions. That's all you have to offer. You offer no scriptural support for your opinions unlike everyone else in this thread.
Mentioning recap in this thread is breaking rule #2, #4, and #5. No judgment on peoples postings styles was also brought up.
 
Upvote 0

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2020
9,318
568
56
Mount Morris
✟125,359.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Outlining what pre-trib posters should or should not believe is doing the same thing you complain about. Let pre-trib posters speak openly, without you telling them what they should believe. I thought that was the point of this thread?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2020
9,318
568
56
Mount Morris
✟125,359.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
I do believe in the catching away of the saints. I believe when Jesus comes He will rescue His elect in total and then immediately destroy all the wicked. He will regenerate this corrupt eand we will then populate the new perfected earth.
What verse supports populating a new earth?
 
Upvote 0

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2020
9,318
568
56
Mount Morris
✟125,359.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
How are we to take this seriously, if you do not even follow your own rules. Recap is not Scripture. It is adding to the context. It is not even a scriptural term.

Recap is human opinion based on a bias that Revelation is not in chronological order. If human opinion is stricken from this thread, then so goes recap, which is just human opinion.

If you cannot compare Scripture with Scripture to show any out of order sequences, then no more complaining that posters are just using their opinion instead of God's Word.

We can only take that as: Amil posters can use opinion, but pre-trib posters cannot. How is that a fair discussion?
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,784.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

You really do not get it. Recap is acknowledging what the Holy Spirit does repeatedly in the Word in repeating a truth, reality or event, and enlarging upon a the same. We see that from start to finish in Scripture. It is right there at the start with the creation story. It can be found throughout the Word of God. It is also seen in the book of Revelation. It is simply a theological recognition. It is not forcing man-made terms into a text, like you continually do.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2020
9,318
568
56
Mount Morris
✟125,359.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
It is forcing man made terms on the text. Theology is human opinion of God's Word.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
7,394
2,496
MI
✟308,043.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
No, I haven't. Honestly, I can't take it seriously and don't think it's even worth my time debating against something as farfetched as that. That's my opinion and I'm not intending to offend you by saying that.
 
Upvote 0

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
7,394
2,496
MI
✟308,043.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Mentioning recap in this thread is breaking rule #2, #4, and #5.
That's nonsense. Seeing recaps is one way to interpret the text and has nothing to do with changing the text or adding to it. You assume that everything is literal and all in chronological order, but that is your assumption and your opinion only.
 
Upvote 0

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2020
9,318
568
56
Mount Morris
✟125,359.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
That's nonsense. Seeing recaps is one way to interpret the text and has nothing to do with changing the text or adding to it. You assume that everything is literal and all in chronological order, but that is your assumption and your opinion only.
That is fine for any other thread. I thought we were going by rules in this thread. I guess not?
 
Upvote 0

DavidPT

Well-Known Member
Sep 26, 2016
8,602
2,107
Texas
✟196,523.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
That is fine for any other thread. I thought we were going by rules in this thread. I guess not?


Though I grasp your point in regards to the rules for this thread, but in regards to recaps though, Revelation 20 involves zero recaps, but that doesn't mean the same is true of everything else recorded in Revelation. Plus, it seems silly that if some of Revelation 20 is paralleling some of Revelation 19, that John would think his readers are so forgetful about things that he needs to remind us in Revelation 20:10 that where satan is cast into, the beast and fp were cast into at an earlier time. An earlier time? If assuming this scenario. Revelation 19 would not be meaning an earlier time, it would be meaning the same day.
 
Upvote 0

Acts29

Active Member
Oct 24, 2021
287
76
50
Tennessee
✟23,633.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

No, I haven't. Honestly, I can't take it seriously and don't think it's even worth my time debating against something as farfetched as that. That's my opinion and I'm not intending to offend you by saying that.

When Elijah the prophet arises and tells you the very same thing I did, will you reject him also? If so, you will see it, but by no means participate in it.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,784.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
When Elijah the prophet arises and tells you the very same thing I did, will you reject him also? If so, you will see it, but by no means participate in it.

Amils take their direction from God. Sorry if that cuts across your theories.
 
Upvote 0

Rachel20

Well-Known Member
May 30, 2020
1,954
1,443
STX
✟58,109.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single

You switched the debate topic on me. On the prior OP, we were discussing rapture timing views, which I've studied with other premilleninialists, not amillennialists (couldn't you tell from my question in post #4?) So, being on a learning curve for amillennialism, I had to do a quick review from various internet sources. It wasn't meant to speak on behalf of anyone, but to present my [limited] understanding in order to open it up for clarification.

That said, it looks like you have plenty of knowledgeable people willing to engage you on the subject of amillennialism, so you got what you were looking for
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,784.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

I started this to engage with you. I have been waiting for your response.
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,784.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

I was hoping that you would present your Scripture that describes (1) a rapture of the Church, (2) immediately followed by a literal seven-year tribulation, (3) immediately followed by a further coming of Christ. Is it possible that you could do that? Ultimately, that is at the core of proving any truth.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

GreekOrthodox

Psalti Chrysostom
Oct 25, 2010
4,121
4,191
Yorktown VA
✟176,342.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0