Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
God_of_Mercy said:From:
So I don't have salvation?
Mea Culpa said:QUOTED from TLF:Yep, wrong! At least the way he meant it.That is my point though. I am not separated from the Body of Christ if I am not affiliated with the Catholic Church.
But I have to wonder if some believe they can be saved if they are separated from the Body of Christ?
I have to wonder if some believe they can KNOWINGLY (meaning they have full knowledge what they are rejecting is true) and DELIBERATELY reject truth, and still be joined to the Body of Christ . . . ?
The body of Christ, whether people want to believe it or not, is the Universal Church, containing ALL those people who both INSIDE and OUTSIDE the Catholic Church have met Christ personally and excepted Him as their Saviour and believed on His name. [/quot]
That's a starting point, and we agree in a very general way . . the Catholic Church believes this as well, though we would probably state it a little differently.
I know that this is not excepted by a lot of people, but it is the heart of what I am trying to say and it is the truth.
We are not disagreeing in any essential way here . .
Another way to say it from our perspective is - We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not.
Does that make sense?
We beleive the Church is both visible and invisible. We know where it is visibly . .we do not know where it is invisibly . . ie we cannot judge the heart of another and consign them to hell or heaven.
How narrow a view that only those in this one body of believers can be saved, when there are lots of other believers in the world!
Who has this view in this thread?
A Catholic who walks away from the Catholic Church is no more or less damned then anyone else.
True . . .we are all held accountable for the truth we know . ..
But going back to what I said in my post you quoted, if we KNOWINGLY (meaning we have full knowledge what we are rejecting is true) and DELIBERATELY reject truth, are we still be joined to the Body of Christ?
Are we still joined to Christ who is Truth Himself if we reject truth in such a fashion?
It is possible that they finally came to the conclusion that they disagreed with some of its teachings. God would and does understand that, otherwise I could not be saved apart from the Catholic Church.
God knows the heart . . . I don't know your heart. I don't know why you disagreed, what you knew before, what you really know to be true, or if you are genuinely in a place where you truly don't know that some of the teachings of the Church are true . . . I will never pass judgement on you in such a way.
In any case, what the words we have been debating say is that you have to know it is the truth and then deliberately reject what you know to be the truth to be in such a state. . .
Can one deliberately reject what one knows is truth and still be joined to TRUTH Himself?
This is what I meant when I said that the Catholic Church is not the Jews of the New Testament, which Peter taught, and it is not the Gentiles to where Paul felt led to go. The body of Christ is not separated by those things, it is one and huge family of believers regardless of if you except the Catholic teachings or not.
Believe me I used to see things exactly the same way.
I agree that the body of Christ is not separated by whether we were a Jew or Gentile BEFORE we come into the One Body which is Christ's, but I think it is wrong to use this analogy to justify the many divisions which are evidenced in the Christian faith today or to brush them aside . . . It is wrong, in my opinion, to take the state of things that existed BEFORE we come to Chirst to justify divisions IN Christendom today.
If we believe in One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church that should mean something . . it should mean that we are indeed One . . One in faith, Holy -separated unto God in unity of that same faith, which is Catholic ie Universal - all believing the same faith, and Apostolic - the same faith handed down by the apostles . . .
We have so many different chrsitian groups claiming to be this, claiming to hold to that faith handed down by the apostles, yet disagreing as to what that faith is . .
Yes there are people in these various faith groups who belong to Christ, but which faith group can we point people to and say, "here is where you can go to learn and receive the teachings of the Apostles, the One, Holy, Caholic and Apostolic faith"?
See, it is not enough that there are individuals who belong to Christ in the various christian groups . . .
Who these are are hidden . . they comprise the invisible Church of God.
But how is that enough for a world that needs Christ?
Christ said we are to be a city set on a hill . . . a lamp shining in the darkness . . . He was not speaking about us individually, but of His Church, His Body collectively . . .
He was speaking of His Church being VERY VISIBLE to the world . . . a beacon people could see and be drawn to . . . A City on a Hill that can be seen and found . . .
Jesus said to let our light shine before men . . .this metaphor refers to2) c) that which is exposed to the view of all, openly, publicly.These images do not concern an invisilbe Church but a highly VISIBLE Church . . .
http://www.blueletterbible.org/tmp_dir/words/5/1133730821-7166.html
It has been observed that the greatest hinderance to people converting the the Christian faith is the plethora of contradicting christian groups all claiming to be right, yet contradicting each other in so many ways . . .
People know intuitively that if a God exists, if He is who we say He is, then He is not the author of confusion, which is what all these divisions present them with . . confusion.
This confusion is not what Jesus was speaking of when He said that we are a city set on a hill . . .
We are to be ONE city, set on ONE hill, not a myriad of little cities and towns each set on their own inidividual hills saying "Here! We have thet truth, we have more truth than they do!"
What is the wolrd supposed to do with such a thing? It is sheer confusion to them . ..
This is not what Christ described . . . So there has to be a VISIBLE Church such a Christ described . .. ONE city set on a hill that is highly visible and exposed to the view of all, openly and publicly.
After deep, intense prayerful searching and study spanning 3 years, I have found that One city, visible Church to be the Catholic Church.
To this all members of the Body of Christ are joined, whether formally or not.
The fact that a believer leaves the Christian Church, and decides that it is all nonesense, is one thing. Only God knows if that person is truly saved or not. It is not for us to judge.
The same with any who leave the Catholic Church, who depart from the truth in some aspect . . .
The same with anyone who is part of the Catholic Church.
Just because someone is formally a part of the Catholic Church, this does not automatically mean they will receive the Hope of their Salvation. . . . .
So this also applies to the Catholic Church as well as any other body of believers.
Has what I said helped to clarify our beliefs?
Peace toa ll
JimfromOhio said:Sounds like they are putting faith in the Church rather than Jesus Christ.
Naomi4Christ said:I don't actively reject the Roman Catholic Church. I live in England and the natural choice there is to go to an Anglican church - and that suits me just fine. No need to look any further. But from what I know about the RCC, it would be at the bottom of my list of choices.
Augustine_Was_Calvinist said:I started to post that yesterday on another thread when a RC claimed that Roman Catholics never condemn anyone to hell.
The last one;
Furthermore, we declare, we proclaim, we define that it is
absolutely necessary for salvation that every human creature be
subject to the Roman Pontiff.
is especially arrogant and anti-Biblical.
Isaiah 53 said:The Catholic Church is Christ's Church...to KNOWINGLY reject her is to reject Christ. Those, through no fault of their own, are ignorant of the Church and her teachings are not bound by Unam Sanctam...those of us that are fully aware of the Church would be damned.
In other words, if I decided to leave the Church, knowing what I know, I would be damning myself.
PAX CHRISTI
Naomi4Christ said:Well, I am not seeking and I think God has given me plenty to do where I am.
My knowledge of the RCC is not all from the internet - I married into a devout RC family. DH is not so brainwashed as some Catholics...
Isaiah 53 said:I am afraid I dont understand your point...can I argue a case for the Catholic Church being the Church Christ founded...sure I can, but that is not the point of this thread (not to mention it has been beaten to death). The OP asked if they were reading (US) correctly....I clarified.
PAX CHRISTI
SassySDA said:So YOU say. There is NOTHING biblical that supports that. Peter and a rock, and you come up with the Catholic church is Christ's church.
Common sense...yes, God gave us a brain to use,....says that WE, the followers of Christ ARE HIS CHURCH.
If there were no buildings on this planet at all. NONE, are you saying that there wouldn't be a church at all? Of course not. Christ's church is made of His people.
SassySDA said:You can argue it, but you can't BIBLICALLY support it. You have the teachings of your church father's and the catholics I have spoken with feel that it is even MORE important to have the church father's teachings...so we would be at what is called an impasse. I do believe that is why you have difficulty with "sola scriptura".
You see...anything to do with one's salvation, Jesus wouldn't have left to someone's "church father's" alone.
It is clearly spelled out where salvation comes from, what one must do in order to be saved, and the words, "be a member of the Catholic Church", are not among them.
Lo' be to anyone who thinks to cause one of His children to stumble. To say that the CC is THE church for salvational purposes is just plain wrong.
thereselittleflower said:Do you know it is true?
See, this is what everyone who wants to condemn the Catholic Church for the words of Unam Sanctun ignores . . .
One has to KNOW it is true, then DELIBERATELY REJECT it . . .
Christ is Truth Himself.
Can on DELIBERATELY and KNOWINGLY reject what they KNOW to be true and still be united to Truth Himself?
Peace to all
SassySDA said:Just HOW am I supposed to know whether it's true or not true? Because, people, this is NOT in scripture.
If I can't find support for things biblically, I'm NOT going to listen to some man tell me that this is true, and I'm just supposed to heed his words.
I did that in another church for over 40 years, before I finally found out that I can read and understand God's word myself. What I found contradicted almost everything, but the way of salvation, that I had ever been taught. This was a mainstream church I'm talking about here, not a sect, or cult.
I'm not going there again. I will take God's word as truth over anything else, any day.
SassySDA said:You can argue it, but you can't BIBLICALLY support it. You have the teachings of your church father's and the catholics I have spoken with feel that it is even MORE important to have the church father's teachings...so we would be at what is called an impasse. I do believe that is why you have difficulty with "sola scriptura".
You see...anything to do with one's salvation, Jesus wouldn't have left to someone's "church father's" alone. It is clearly spelled out where salvation comes from, what one must do in order to be saved, and the words, "be a member of the Catholic Church", are not among them.
Lo' be to anyone who thinks to cause one of His children to stumble. To say that the CC is THE church for salvational purposes is just plain wrong.
Prophet01 said:Can I ask everyone a question?
Are we to follow the example of Christ as best we can?
"Sounds like they are putting faith in the Church rather than Jesus Christ."
Didnt Christ put his faith in his Church when he said
"so as the father sent me, so am I sending you" ?
"feed my sheep"
"bind, loosen"
I think that is part of christianity, to accept that we must put our faith in Christ, who put his faith in his Church and i think this is all the catholic faith is doing, calling us to have faith in Christ, and since christs promise to his church that he will be with her until the end of time, isnt faith in the Church faith in Christ?
Prophet01 said:its just plain and simple, I think sometimes we just over complicate things
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?