Astrophile
Newbie
- Aug 30, 2013
- 2,280
- 1,525
- 76
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Widowed
Upvote
0
Of course it would because all you have is 'goddidit', how can you argue when you have no basis to argue from, some forte.I would love for this guy to come here and debate me on creationism ... my forte.
It would be a short one, I'm sure; but just about as entertaining as his card trick.
That is absolutely correct.Of course it would because all you have is 'goddidit',
That's because questions will come up that only the Bible can answer ... not myopic science.MasonP said:... try arguing your case without referring to the bible and you will see just how little you have.
That is absolutely correct.
My approach to debating creationism is: GOD DID IT.
Three simple one-syllable words that any child can say.
My point will be made by the evolutionist I'm debating, as he will try everything he can to get the focus off of the Creation Week and on to fossils, sin, ERVs, ice cores, dendrochronology, and so forth.But it doesn't prove your point.
Good for you!Speedwell said:Even I can say GOD DID IT with a clear conscience ...
Disrespectfully, I take it?Speedwell said:... and I think your interpretation of Genesis... Well, you know what I think of it.
LOL!My point will be made by the evolutionist I'm debating, as he will try everything he can to get the focus off of the Creation Week and on to fossils, sin, ERVs, ice cores, dendrochronology, and so forth.
He will also eventually display a disrespect for such terms as creatio ex nihilo, creatio ex materia, and miracles.Good for you!
So can I!
On behalf of myself and our kindergarten class at church, you get an A.Disrespectfully, I take it?
Well, if that guy wants to join CF and discuss creationism with me, I'll show you what I mean.LOL!
His name is Matt Dillahunty and he hosts the Atheist Experience, an Internet-only show out of Austin Texas, he was a Christian for 25 years and was studying to be a minister so he knows his Bible backwards.Well, if that guy wants to join CF and discuss creationism with me, I'll show you what I mean.
But if he just wants to sit and do card tricks at a table for YouTube, then his opinions can take a hike.
Thanks for the info.His name is Matt Dillahunty and he hosts the Atheist Experience, an Internet-only show out of Austin Texas.
You can phone him on 1-512-686-0279 during the show.
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheAtheistExperience
No, thanks.MasonP said:Apparently it's been going for about 12 years now and it's not getting smart callers anymore because they know they are going to get shot down.
Why don't you give them a call and put them straight?
Do you mean away from old stories and back on to reality? you seem to be very afraid of reality, why is that? are you hoping that your stories will help you when you are dying?My point will be made by the evolutionist I'm debating, as he will try everything he can to get the focus off of the Creation Week and on to fossils, sin, ERVs, ice cores, dendrochronology, and so forth.
As I said, any child can do it.Saying 'goddidit' can hardly be called work.
Religion is one thing ... creationism is another.MasonP said:Apparently card tricks are his hobby and shooting down religions is his job.
Science's version of reality, as I told one poster here, is like a pea in a corn field.Do you mean away from old stories and back on to reality?
Creationism needs to be taught in history class as fact; and doesn't belong in science class.Are you saying creationism is not bound up with religion?
Yes, why?MasonP said:Would you say your commitment to creationism is total?
Then why is creationism classed as a faith if you think it's a fact? surely facts are backed by evidence.Creationism needs to be taught in history class as fact; and doesn't belong in science class.
I'm sure I can remember reading in a post that you said you were not a creationist.Yes, why?
Because creationism is a truth not supported by evidence; as my Apple Challenge demonstrates.Then why is creationism classed as a faith if you think it's a fact?
Not always.MasonP said:surely facts are backed by evidence.
You might want to read it again though.MasonP said:I'm sure I can remember reading in a post that you said you were not a creationist.
Do you mean like Islam, Buddhism and Hinduism?Because creationism is a truth not supported by evidence;
I went to find the post I read it in and all I could find was number counting posts, what's all that about? how many of your 3.5 million posts are real?You might want to read it again though.
I never said that.
No.Do you mean like Islam, Buddhism and Hinduism?
Counting numbers.MasonP said:I went to find the post I read it in and all I could find was number counting posts, what's all that about?
3,532,223 so far.MasonP said:how many of your 3.5 million posts are real?