But seriously, the Catholic Church can't convince anyone else of the Pope's authority, and this kid wants to convince atheists? Come on now, son, you're not even trying anymore.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That 'office' is a tradition of man and was not given by Jesus.
And Jesus gave the power to Peter - he didn't mention anything about Peter's successors.
No, not ordained by Christ. Invented by men.
Read a (non Catholic) history of the Church and learn.
But seriously, the Catholic Church can't convince anyone else of the Pope's authority, and this kid wants to convince atheists? Come on now, son, you're not even trying anymore.
I find it strange that I am four years older than you, yet you call me a kid, that must make you a child.
I speak the truth, the atheist is doomed anyway, you can either accept it and pray on it or not (I guess you would pick not)......the Lord says that small is the door that leads to heaven and narrow is the road and few will travel it...so it doesnt surprise me that few will listen to the truth, Christ already knew that many would reject his bride.
Really? Where in the bible is this found? Or is it just a tradition of men?He gave the power to St Peter to set up his church, Peter set it up with his power to loose and bind, and that included the office of the Vicar of Christ.
Peter bound his succesor, and passed on the power to his succesors.....and as the scripture states that which the Vicar of Christ Binds on earth shall also be bound in heaven.
Really? Where in the bible is this found? Or is it just a tradition of men?Jesus said WHATEVER St Peter bound, he bound the office of the Pope.
No, it's not. It's like you going to a NON-Islamic site to learn about Islam. There's a big difference between a NON-X site and an ANTI-X site. You are likely to get propoganda from a PRO-X site and an ANTI-X site; you are more likely to get facts from a NON-X site.please thats like me going to an anti Islamic site to learn about Islam.
I see this.Jesus said WHATEVER St Peter bound,
Will you give Scripture reference for any of this? Peter wrote 2 books of the Bible, and was described in others. Where is any of the rest of this shown in Scripture? Or do you have some other written proof from St. Peter that he id any of these things? Or is it simply oral church history?he bound the office of the Pope.
Jesus Gave St Pater the power to bind, and he bound his succesor.
Christ gave St Peter the power to bind, and he bound the church...ordained by Christ.
Can you name a single wrong act made out of real (self-sacrificing) love? I can't. The fact of the matter is that real love wants what's best for the other person. Therefore, doing what's best for the other person would result in no wrong act being performed. Or am I missing something that makes that not follow?If you think that the difference between right and wrong is the difference between loving and not loving, you're going to have to explain why. Without citing the Bible.
Yes, I think you are missing something. Since I cannot really relate to the word "wrong" (as used in Christian terminology), I will speak about harmful acts. Although I agree with the notion that a loving person wants what´s best for the other, the loving person might not know what´s best for the other. I know of plenty of examples where love and the best intentions led to great harm.Can you name a single wrong act made out of real (self-sacrificing) love? I can't. The fact of the matter is that real love wants what's best for the other person. Therefore, doing what's best for the other person would result in no wrong act being performed. Or am I missing something that makes that not follow?
Really? Where in the bible is this found? Or is it just a tradition of men?
Really? Where in the bible is this found? Or is it just a tradition of men?
No, it's not. It's like you going to a NON-Islamic site to learn about Islam. There's a big difference between a NON-X site and an ANTI-X site. You are likely to get propoganda from a PRO-X site and an ANTI-X site; you are more likely to get facts from a NON-X site.
How does someone "choose" to believe in something that doesn't make sense to them? You can't momentarily suspend your belief in God; I submit that your belief in God is not a choice.I speak the truth, the atheist is doomed anyway, you can either accept it and pray on it or not (I guess you would pick not)
How does someone "choose" to believe in something that doesn't make sense to them? You can't momentarily suspend your belief in God; I submit that your belief in God is not a choice.
Trickster
So for a moment, you actually chose not to believe in Jesus? I think you're lying. You have no choice but to believe in what you believe. Such is the nature of belief.i have momentarily suspended my Christianity on another thread.
Does it mean I am not a christian no, just that I am making arguments that do not involve christianity.
All belief is a choice.
Not really, unless you can illustrate to me by a real example from your personal experience. I don't know of anything I truly believe that I can simply "make myself not believe" because I want to.I don't know that a person has no choice in what they believe. After all, I can choose to believe anything I wish until it's shown to me, one way or another. If I'm blind, I don't know that the sky is generally blue or that chlorophyll is green. I believe it. If I gain sight, then I can know.
I can't choose not to believe in Jesus because He's shown Himself to me. His existence and (basic) nature are facts to me, not simply belief. Most atheists I've "spoken" to (some online, others not) have simply stated a lack of belief based on too little evidence. Not a staunch belief that there is no deity, but that they've not seen evidence to make the existence of Jesus (or any other deity) fact to them.
Does that make any sense?
Rachel
So for a moment, you actually chose not to believe in Jesus? I think you're lying. You have no choice but to believe in what you believe. Such is the nature of belief.
Trickster
Sure it is, its like saying lets only believe the American History of the Cold War that was written by the Russians.
No. Let's believe the American History of the Cold War written by the Swiss.
Why would the swiss be more accurate than the Russians. I was refering to the fact thatRussia would hardly have been allowed to go into America to write the history at the time....most Historians now were notthere at the beggining of the Church, so that was my point.
Can we also assume that by this you are saying that any American History that is written by the American People is not to be believed at all.
Actually, I'd say there's always that possibility. You know . . . there could be gnomes in the world. We just haven't seen any for a really long time. But then, I'm pretty gullible (I have a fantastically strong imagination).Not really, unless you can illustrate to me by a real example from your personal experience. I don't know of anything I truly believe that I can simply "make myself not believe" because I want to.
So, I ask you to choose to believe, right this very moment, that lawn gnomes come to life when you're not looking. Is that something you can choose to do? Or is this, as I presume, impossible?
Trickster