• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Age in Relationships

xtxArchxAngelxtx

Peace Keeper
Aug 18, 2003
1,466
48
40
Dayton Ohio
Visit site
✟24,403.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Politics
US-Republican
Electric Sceptic said:
This is awful, terrible, rotten advice. Please, any women reading, do not listen to the above. The first time your husband hits you, run, do not walk, to your nearest police station and do not return.
If you will notice, earlier on in the thread, I said women do not have to stay in these relationships. I understand perfectly why they would want to leave and put no blame on them if they do, nor should I. I am simply saying what I think should be done, what I have seen be done, and what I know can also be successful and more fruitful.

No one hear is taking anything I am saying with consideration nor an open mind and are reviling me. I am done here.
 
Upvote 0

k

reset
Aug 29, 2004
18,914
808
115
✟23,943.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
No one hear is taking anything I am saying with consideration nor an open mind and are reviling me. I am done here.
How are people "reviling" you? I haven't seen abusive language towards you...but maybe we are reading the tone of some posts a little differently?

Just because people refute an argument with valid points doesn't mean people aren't being "open minded."

We must not give up so easily. More important, whenever we enter into discussion we must do so with the ability to change one's position based on new information. We are here to learn from each other.:)
 
Upvote 0

xtxArchxAngelxtx

Peace Keeper
Aug 18, 2003
1,466
48
40
Dayton Ohio
Visit site
✟24,403.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Politics
US-Republican
Neverstop said:
How are people "reviling" you? I haven't seen abusive language towards you...but maybe we are reading the tone of some posts a little differently?

Just because people refute an argument with valid points doesn't mean people aren't being "open minded."

We must not give up so easily. More important, whenever we enter into discussion we must do so with the ability to change one's position based on new information. We are here to learn from each other.:)
Forgive me, Neverstop, you have been rather graceous to my thoughts.

It's not that electric was refuting it, he was saying something I had even said about "the police" because even I said a woman can get help before a divorce comes about, whether human help or Godly.
That is what ticked me off.

As far as having the ability to change ones beliefes, I have already been on both sides of the spectrum.

Jesusfreak, I want you to be aware that all else I say may or may not affect you, but I am speaking on research I have done and personal experiances.

Abuse, just like, is not justified. No "desirves" to be abused. I think we can all agree on that with the amount of senstivity everyone is putting into this discussion.
However, I am willing to say that abuse can be prevented or reduced. In studies of women who were abused had crappy history with thier father (go figure) and also had "issues" sexually, such as shyness or even hesistance to it, or hardly wanting it all. Also the opposite is instated. Women have security issues. If a wife beleives she is not as secure with her husband as much as she should, it is her natural instinct to seek it elsewhere sexually, emotional, and mentally. NOTE: Jesusfreak, this sounds very much like your situation with the other man you fell in love with (just an observation, not saying it's true cause I don't know you). With men who are abusive, like women who also have been abused by men ironically also had a bad past with their father. With men, thier hormons are very extreme in most cases. Lack of habbitual sex literally causes anger and frustration. Now, these are not excuses, just observations. Just keep this in mind, I am not saying the wife has to give sex to her husband just so HEE MIGHT NOT hit her.
Amongst other things, it is also mans instinct to be physical and violent. Once again, does not make it right nor does it justify it. Men are territorial and this is included with wives. When a territory is threatened, men will normally act violently or physical to fix it or keep it. It is literally a battle between the emotional and physical. Most men cannot handle a great amount of emotional stress... and just with my history of girlfriends, I for one know they can put on a great deal of that emotional stress. Unfortunatly, most men, likemyself, tend to surpress it and forget about it. Other men can sometimes turn it into anger due to frustration, especially when it comes to sex.
My ex g/f who was also married and divorced (which is the time period I came to have a better understanding of the scripture everyone is using against me about divorce) due to unfaithfulness; he cheated on her. I found it interesting that if he ever did a slight thing to tick her off, she would stop cleaning, cooking, and go out and spend money on clothes and jewlry. I beleive this is also a natural thing for women to do to ease stress, though I cannot connect natural instincts too it (since I am male, I know less about women, go figure). Her husband, from what I could tell, gave up on this relationship simply because this had gone of for a year. This is getting graphic, but she would also hardly have sex with him, and often told him to just touch. As you can tell, her and I had an open relationship.
Is abuse justified? I still say no to worldy standards. I beleive her actions in the relationship would also be considered marital unfaithfulness. Whatever did not make her happy, caused huge problems.

There are many statistics saying that often wives who are abused also acted similar to my ex g/f.
For those who are only skimming, I will repeat: THIS IS NOT TRUE FOR EVERYONE WHO IS ABUSED, NOR AM I SAYING JESUSFREAK WAS IN THIS SITUATION.

Once again, my whole claim to the original OP is that if one need to marry another christian, of maturity, both physical and spiritual, financially, and mental stability wise. If both couples are seeking God as strong young men and women in the Lord, chances are the relationship will not become abusive.

To carry some weight with what I say, I am a chaplain asistant for the army (help counseling soldiers and their families). Granted it is not nearly as in depth as what a chaplain has, but I do also study religion and psychology.
 
Upvote 0

morningstar2651

Senior Veteran
Dec 6, 2004
14,557
2,591
40
Arizona
✟74,149.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
xtxArchxAngelxtx said:
Back in the day (OT), men were allowed to give their wives a write of divorce if they found her to not be a virgin within the first 7 days. After that time period, he was bound to her. I believe it to still be the same today.

This is a VERY LIGHT aspect of my views with 0 depth at all. As I stated earlier, I will go into more detail tomorrow...

But for now, I am off to bed.

Peace n Godbless.
It's been nearly 12 hours.
I'm still waiting on that answer.
 
Upvote 0

xtxArchxAngelxtx

Peace Keeper
Aug 18, 2003
1,466
48
40
Dayton Ohio
Visit site
✟24,403.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Politics
US-Republican
morningstar2651 said:
It's been nearly 12 hours.
I'm still waiting on that answer.
I no longer have the study, it will take me a few hours find the scriptures and find my notes.
Needless to say, I havn't started.

It has been 12 hours, and I am still waiting for conformation from you and anyone else to see if my toils will be vain or not.
 
Upvote 0

Electric Sceptic

Well-Known Member
Dec 4, 2004
3,063
80
63
✟3,622.00
Faith
Atheist
xtxArchxAngelxtx said:
If you will notice, earlier on in the thread, I said women do not have to stay in these relationships. I understand perfectly why they would want to leave and put no blame on them if they do, nor should I. I am simply saying what I think should be done, what I have seen be done, and what I know can also be successful and more fruitful.

No one hear is taking anything I am saying with consideration nor an open mind and are reviling me. I am done here.
I have at no stage reviled you. You gave your opinion on how a certain situation should be handled; I gave mine. What I said was no form of attack on you - it was a firm disagreement with what you said.
 
Upvote 0

xtxArchxAngelxtx

Peace Keeper
Aug 18, 2003
1,466
48
40
Dayton Ohio
Visit site
✟24,403.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Politics
US-Republican
Electric Sceptic said:
I have at no stage reviled you. You gave your opinion on how a certain situation should be handled; I gave mine. What I said was no form of attack on you - it was a firm disagreement with what you said.
I can very easily call your advice apathetic and rebelious to Gods will according to what you would call "opinions."The difference is, I try to remain peaceful... your comment was not, hence my reaction. Do you see where I am coming from? This discussion can and should remain without tone and peaceful. If not, well... we will see.
I am not trying to make this a right/wrong scenario. I am over it, and I am sure you would like to move on as I would.
 
Upvote 0

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,439
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟617,196.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
xtxArchxAngelxtx said:
It's not that electric was refuting it, he was saying something I had even said about "the police" because even I said a woman can get help before a divorce comes about, whether human help or Godly.
That is what ticked me off.

As far as having the ability to change ones beliefes, I have already been on both sides of the spectrum.

Jesusfreak, I want you to be aware that all else I say may or may not affect you, but I am speaking on research I have done and personal experiances.

Abuse, just like, is not justified. No "desirves" to be abused. I think we can all agree on that with the amount of senstivity everyone is putting into this discussion.
However, I am willing to say that abuse can be prevented or reduced. In studies of women who were abused had crappy history with thier father (go figure) and also had "issues" sexually, such as shyness or even hesistance to it, or hardly wanting it all. Also the opposite is instated. Women have security issues. If a wife beleives she is not as secure with her husband as much as she should, it is her natural instinct to seek it elsewhere sexually, emotional, and mentally. NOTE: Jesusfreak, this sounds very much like your situation with the other man you fell in love with (just an observation, not saying it's true cause I don't know you). With men who are abusive, like women who also have been abused by men ironically also had a bad past with their father. With men, thier hormons are very extreme in most cases. Lack of habbitual sex literally causes anger and frustration. Now, these are not excuses, just observations. Just keep this in mind, I am not saying the wife has to give sex to her husband just so HEE MIGHT NOT hit her.
Amongst other things, it is also mans instinct to be physical and violent. Once again, does not make it right nor does it justify it. Men are territorial and this is included with wives. When a territory is threatened, men will normally act violently or physical to fix it or keep it. It is literally a battle between the emotional and physical. Most men cannot handle a great amount of emotional stress... and just with my history of girlfriends, I for one know they can put on a great deal of that emotional stress. Unfortunatly, most men, likemyself, tend to surpress it and forget about it. Other men can sometimes turn it into anger due to frustration, especially when it comes to sex.
My ex g/f who was also married and divorced (which is the time period I came to have a better understanding of the scripture everyone is using against me about divorce) due to unfaithfulness; he cheated on her. I found it interesting that if he ever did a slight thing to tick her off, she would stop cleaning, cooking, and go out and spend money on clothes and jewlry. I beleive this is also a natural thing for women to do to ease stress, though I cannot connect natural instincts too it (since I am male, I know less about women, go figure). Her husband, from what I could tell, gave up on this relationship simply because this had gone of for a year. This is getting graphic, but she would also hardly have sex with him, and often told him to just touch. As you can tell, her and I had an open relationship.
Is abuse justified? I still say no to worldy standards. I beleive her actions in the relationship would also be considered marital unfaithfulness. Whatever did not make her happy, caused huge problems.

There are many statistics saying that often wives who are abused also acted similar to my ex g/f.
For those who are only skimming, I will repeat: THIS IS NOT TRUE FOR EVERYONE WHO IS ABUSED, NOR AM I SAYING JESUSFREAK WAS IN THIS SITUATION.

Once again, my whole claim to the original OP is that if one need to marry another christian, of maturity, both physical and spiritual, financially, and mental stability wise. If both couples are seeking God as strong young men and women in the Lord, chances are the relationship will not become abusive.

To carry some weight with what I say, I am a chaplain asistant for the army (help counseling soldiers and their families). Granted it is not nearly as in depth as what a chaplain has, but I do also study religion and psychology.

Despite what you say about women witholding sex or men being more likely to use violence when frustrated, doesn't change the fact that no individual has the right to strike another individual unless it is done in self defense.

Anyone who is in an abusive relationship has every right to get out of that relationship.
 
Upvote 0
C

CypressLB

Guest
Archivist said:
Technically you might be correct, however I always recall something that was said by one of our local judges many years ago: "No man is ever so wrong as when he is merely technically right."
IF you're right you're right. Anyway, I say there should be a pretty small age gap, mostly because when you're 21 you have a very different agenda than someone who's 28. So go out, date, have fun, and don't get pregnant.
 
Upvote 0
C

CypressLB

Guest
Archivist said:
Despite what you say about women witholding sex or men being more likely to use violence when frustrated, doesn't change the fact that no individual has the right to strike another individual unless it is done in self defense.

Anyone who is in an abusive relationship has every right to get out of that relationship.
So true. Although, if woman's had a bad dad, been through abuse in her childhood she will find abusive men to be attractive and will intially go for them. So if you've had a messed up childhood, go get some therapy so that you don't pick a bad spouse.
 
Upvote 0

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,439
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟617,196.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
CypressLB said:
IF you're right you're right. Anyway, I say there should be a pretty small age gap, mostly because when you're 21 you have a very different agenda than someone who's 28. So go out, date, have fun, and don't get pregnant.

I see, to you the letter of the law is all that matters...the spirit of the law is unimportant.

Technically, the Penns were right in the infamous Walking Purchase. Yet what they did was very wrong. The same can be said about many of the treaties that we signed with the Indians. That's why old Judge Sadler was so correct when he said that "no man is ever so wrong as when he is merely technically right."

Yes, you can say the the girls parents had the right to have this Marine imprisoned because their daughter was three days shy of her 18th birthday. Technically you would be correct. But if I were that girl and I were really in love with that Marine, I would--as I previously said--have some unprintable words for my parents, then I would break off all contact with them. You may be technically right in saying that right is right, but never getting to see your grandchildren is a big price to pay for being technically right.
 
Upvote 0

k

reset
Aug 29, 2004
18,914
808
115
✟23,943.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
xtxArchxAngelxtx said:
I am also curious why a pagan has such an interest in such depths of the bible.
I think it's awesome when anyone takes an interest in the Bible. Given the motive is for a better understanding of love, Faith, God, Jesus, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jetgirl
Upvote 0

k

reset
Aug 29, 2004
18,914
808
115
✟23,943.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
Forgive me, Neverstop, you have been rather graceous to my thoughts.



Hey, no hassles.:) I didn't take it personally anyways. We can all get excited in these discussions, but it seems the important thing is to never lose focus for the purpose of the discussions: to learn from each other.
 
Upvote 0

morningstar2651

Senior Veteran
Dec 6, 2004
14,557
2,591
40
Arizona
✟74,149.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
xtxArchxAngelxtx said:
I am also curious why a pagan has such an interest in such depths of the bible.
Why not?

I'm interested in the writings of all religions.

EDIT: Does my religion make me unworthy of learning more about "the good book" and Christianity?
 
Upvote 0

xtxArchxAngelxtx

Peace Keeper
Aug 18, 2003
1,466
48
40
Dayton Ohio
Visit site
✟24,403.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Politics
US-Republican
Archivist said:
Despite what you say about women witholding sex or men being more likely to use violence when frustrated, doesn't change the fact that no individual has the right to strike another individual unless it is done in self defense.

Anyone who is in an abusive relationship has every right to get out of that relationship.
"doesn't change the fact that no individual has the right to strike another individual unless it is done in self defense. "

I stated this fact 3 times in the post you responded too...

"Anyone who is in an abusive relationship has every right to get out of that relationship." I never said they didn't, infact said the opposite.
 
Upvote 0

xtxArchxAngelxtx

Peace Keeper
Aug 18, 2003
1,466
48
40
Dayton Ohio
Visit site
✟24,403.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Politics
US-Republican
Neverstop said:
I think it's awesome when anyone takes an interest in the Bible. Given the motive is for a better understanding of love, Faith, God, Jesus, etc.
Believing that the word of God is foolishness to those who are not christians is what makes me wonder.

To me, to dismiss one verse dismisses them all. A christian and a non christian discussing the bible in any great depth is very vain simply because they are on two completly different levels of mind sets and motivations.
 
Upvote 0

xtxArchxAngelxtx

Peace Keeper
Aug 18, 2003
1,466
48
40
Dayton Ohio
Visit site
✟24,403.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Politics
US-Republican
morningstar2651 said:
Why not?

I'm interested in the writings of all religions.

EDIT: Does my religion make me unworthy of learning more about "the good book" and Christianity?
I suggest reading the Quran instead, it makes more sense, and is still in it's original text without going through multiple translators/translations.
 
Upvote 0

morningstar2651

Senior Veteran
Dec 6, 2004
14,557
2,591
40
Arizona
✟74,149.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
xtxArchxAngelxtx said:
I suggest reading the Quran instead, it makes more sense, and is still in it's original text without going through multiple translators/translations.
In other words, you have no verses to back up your argument.

Why am I not surprised?

Sounds like a good idea though, I would rather read some more of the Mahabharata first though.
 
Upvote 0