Acts 16:14

[AndOne]

Where I come from, that's called telling the truth. There is not meant to be a gram of discrimination in what I said - from my perspective. I love and respect you in the Lord, but when I see a particular type of interpretation being pushed at the expense of other interpretations, I tell the truth about what I see.

Then no point in debating here unless you are only interested in harassment and arguing. We all have different perspectives which we defend. Saying I am coming at it from a Calvinist perspective doesn't mean anything to me. It certainly doesn't prove that it's wrong.

 

[guuila]

Then no point in debating here unless you are only interested in harassment and arguing. We all have different perspectives which we defend. Saying I am coming at it from a Calvinist perspective doesn't mean anything to me. It certainly doesn't prove that it's wrong.

Strange that Oz is allowed to come at it from an Arminian perspective and that's perfectly fine, but if you come from a Calvinist perspective, well, you're just wrong for having presuppositions and a certain interpretation.

 

[guuila]

Well, that was fun.

 

[Hammster]

Yep.

 

[OzSpen]

Strange that Oz is allowed to come at it from an Arminian perspective and that's perfectly fine, but if you come from a Calvinist perspective, well, you're just wrong for having presuppositions and a certain interpretation.

Why don't you address me directly instead of sniping at me in this indirect way?

 

[Hammster]

Why don't you address me directly instead of sniping at me in this indirect way?

Because you avoid answering direct questions?

 

[guuila]

Why don't you address me directly instead of sniping at me in this indirect way?

Oz it's strange that you are allowed to come at it from an Arminian perspective and that's perfectly fine, but if any one of us comes from a Calvinist perspective, well, we're just wrong for having presuppositions and a certain interpretation. Better?

 

[OzSpen]

Because you avoid answering direct questions?

That is not only a false allegation and a generalisation fallacy, but you avoided giving examples of how I do this.

I will not answer if you or others snipe at me. I find that to be flaming. Your statement here is a flaming one. As a moderator, you should know better than what you did here to me.

 

[OzSpen]

Oz it's strange that you are allowed to come at it from an Arminian perspective and that's perfectly fine, but if any one of us comes from a Calvinist perspective, well, we're just wrong for having presuppositions and a certain interpretation. Better?

Please tell me what you are talking about. I don't understand your generalisation.

 

[Hammster]

That is not only a false allegation and a generalisation fallacy, but you avoided giving examples of how I do this.

I will not answer if you or others snipe at me. I find that to be flaming. Your statement here is a flaming one. As a moderator, you should know better than what you did here to me.

Here's an example.

So until the Lord opened her heart, there was no way she could respond positively to the gospel?

You've never answered the question. All you did was ask another question. I'm still waiting for an answer. And I don't expect that will change.

 

[guuila]

Please tell me what you are talking about. I don't understand your generalisation.

Feel free to go back and read a page or two. Shouldn't be too difficult to figure out.

 

[OzSpen]

Here's an example.

So until the Lord opened her heart, there was no way she could respond positively to the gospel?

You've never answered the question. All you did was ask another question. I'm still waiting for an answer. And I don't expect that will change.

Here you go with another round of your repeats. I answered you at #103 and #104: http://www.christianforums.com/t7804942-11/.

Therefore, what you are doing here is harassing me and that's against the rules of CF. It's time that you practised the CF rules in this regard.

 

[OzSpen]

Feel free to go back and read a page or two. Shouldn't be too difficult to figure out.

You're the one making the generalisation. It's your responsibility to provide me with the specifics.