Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You know that's a good question. I wondered that years ago. Why don't they vote on a bond where the Texas taxpayer pays for it? Maybe it's cheaper to ship them to other states, who knows?Will Texas then pay for the wall on the new border?
That would be up to them.Will Texas then pay for the wall on the new border?
If they are out of the union that would not be able to do so legally.You know that's a good question. I wondered that years ago. Why don't they vote on a bond where the Texas taxpayer pays for it? Maybe it's cheaper to ship them to other states, who knows?
Weird how the law goes right out the window for the "Law and Order" party when the law says they can't do something.![]()
Trump urges states to surge National Guard to Texas as Abbott standoff with Biden accelerates
Former President Donald Trump on Thursday threw his support behind Gov. Greg Abbott, who is currently feuding with the Biden administration over border security.www.foxnews.com
#ISTANDWITHTEXAS
Read the SCOTUS decision carefully. The SCOTUS said that the Feds can cut the concertina wires. But SCOTUS did NOT say that Texas cannot replace the cut wires with new or replacement wires.Weird how the law goes right out the window for the "Law and Order" party when the law says they can't do something.
Do you think it is OK for people to ignore SCOTUS decisions they don't like?
Texas is not allowing the Border Patrol to cut the wires. They are still being illegally prevented from accessing Shelby Park by the Texas National Guard and Texas Military Department.Read the SCOTUS decision carefully. The SCOTUS said that the Feds can cut the concertina wires. But SCOTUS did NOT say that Texas cannot replace the cut wires with new or replacement wires.
Texas is not allowing the Border Patrol to cut the wires. They are still being illegally prevented from accessing Shelby Park by the Texas National Guard and Texas Military Department.
On Wednesday — and as the Texas National Guard and state troopers continued to roll out the wire and prevent federal agents from accessing much of the park — Abbott continued to publicly challenge the ruling and “hold the line." He declared that Texas was under an “invasion,” giving the state the constitutional right to defend itself and claimed that President Joe Biden’s practice of paroling migrants into the country amounted to a refusal to enforce current immigration laws.
Shelby Park is not a federal Park. It is a city and state park. Shelby Park should remain under the authority of Texas.“Hold the line”: Republicans rally to Abbott’s defense in border standoff with Biden
Do you think that Texas should allow the Border Patrol to access the area?
And the border is under the control of the Federal Government.Shelby Park is not a federal Park. It is a city and state park. Shelby Park should remain under the authority of Texas.
And the border is under the control of the Federal Government.
So, SCOTUS stopped the 5th Circuit Decision, allowing the Federal government to cut the razor wire, as per the lower court order that the 5th Circuit halted.
They have the lower court order which instructs them to allow the razor wire to be cut by the Border Patrol.
Texas, legally, is supposed to allow the Border Patrol to cut the razor wire, which requires access to the border and the park. The border which already falls under the purview of the government.
Sounds to me like Texas is breaking the law, there.
So, from what I see, the party of law and order decided that the law doesn't matter to them
Then go to SCOTUS with that argument and have them rule that that's a legal ground to deny access.
That is your opinion, not a fact. Texas is breaking the law by refusing access. You can keep trying to move the goalpost, but that's the fact right now.Texas is following the US Constitution there. Joe Biden is not.
I believe that your opinion is incorrect.That is your opinion, not a fact. Texas is breaking the law by refusing access. You can keep trying to move the goalpost, but that's the fact right now.
I believe that Texas should follow the system of checks and balances we have in this country, and when the highest part of the judicial branch hands out a ruling to allow the Federal government to do what it is empowered to do, they shouldn't decide to throw a tantrum. If they disagree, they need to find a different thread of argument than the one that they had before, and go back up the court system with that.I believe that your opinion is incorrect.
Conservatives can try and twist this all they want - But if they want to reject the SCOTUS ruling, then I will continue to say that Abbot and the republican politicians do not care about law and order.![]()
The Supreme Court is not a suicide pact | Blaze Media
Texas must follow the Constitution when it runs into conflict with the Supreme Court or other branches of government. That is the real meaning of Greg Abbott’s actions this week.www.theblaze.com