- Mar 13, 2004
- 18,941
- 1,758
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
so again you have no evidence that this occurs. Because I don't honor quote mining as a term. So you'll have to try harder if you wish to relay your information clearly.No because in courts of law a "quote mine" would be called something more appropriate like a "lie". Or at best an "intentional misrepresentation".
You told us earlier you had worked at a newspaper. SURELY you know how quotes are treated, correct?
If someone preferentially takes portions of quotes out of context in the hopes of misleading someone it is a quote mine (or if you will, a "lie" or "intentional misrepresentation".) IF, however you cut out a portion of a quote and mark it with ELLIPSES and it does not change the intent or meaning of the quote you are OK.
Why is this such a hard concept?
-sigh- You know if you want people to take you seriously you need to respond in a serious and adult manner. This is absolutely bizarre.
Quote mining is a "common parlance" short hand for "selective quoting to decontextualize the original intent with the intention of misleading the reader into thinking it says something that the original quote did not intend".
In fact BOTH INDIVIDUAL WORDS "Quote" and "Mine" exist in dictionaries all over the world. Even the OED. And combined they make a PHRASE (it is not necessary for every single n-gram phrase to be in the dictionary for it to be a real thing. For instance: is the phrase "Grady is acting strangely" in ANY dictionary you can find? If not, does that mean that phrase has NO MEANING? Nope, because all the words exist in the dictionary and can be combined to form a perfectly rational sentence.
Are you being intentionally obtuse on this? Is this some new gambit?
Upvote
0