A re-examination of nothing (2)

[EnemyPartyII]

No, in the case of scripture is is very much an unerring work. I don't know if you are aware but as scrolls were copied if the writer made the slightest mistake, the copy was burned and the process started again. That's how seriously the word was taken.

You think those doing the writing in the first place would be even more diligent?

Questioning the accuracy of scripture as God's word is a bad place to be for anyone professing to be a Christian. It's already been pointed out to you the accuracy of the text anyway so why do you persist in going back to the same argument?

So then explain all the Biblical contradictions?

 

[Phinehas2]

Dear EnemypartyII,

the fact that David wasn't condemned for his homosexuality is evidence that its not a sin *geez* this is like pulling teeth! If it was a sin, he'd have been condemned for it... he WASN'T condemned for it, ergo, its not a sin!

There is no evidence that David was homsoexual, all the evidence says he wasnt as he slept with women but he didnt sleep wth men. So if he wasnt homoseuxal how could he be condmened for it?

 

[EnemyPartyII]

No I am claiming someone who sleeps with someone of the opposite sex, like David did with the woman, is a heterosexual.

Or bisexual. Look it up

EnemyPartyII referred to David and Jonathan as a homosexual relationship. Love isnt sex, Jesus loved His disciples enough to die for them, He didnt have sex with them. There is no greater love than a man lay down his life for his friend, David and Jonathan were prepared to do that for each other so great was their love.. forget the sex its a perversion of the love the story tells us.

One doesn't even have to have sex to be in a homosexual relationship... You have a girlfriend? are you sleeping with her? Is it a heterosexual relationship if you aren't?

Just the same, a homosexual relationship can exist without sex. Despite what you seem to think, being gay isn't all anonymous drug orgies and feasting on the bodies of aborted children

 

[EnemyPartyII]

Dear EnemypartyII,
There is no evidence that David was homsoexual, all the evidence says he wasnt as he slept with women but he didnt sleep wth men. So if he wasnt homoseuxal how could he be condmened for it?

all the evidence says he was, at the very east, bisexual... on account of his relationship with Jonathon

 

[Phinehas2]

Dear EnemyPartyII,
If you acepted what the Bible actually says presented before you, you wouldnt see any contradictions. There arent any.

 

[Phinehas2]

Dear EnemypartyII

Or bisexual. Look it up

I have looked t up, someone who sleeps with someone of the opposite sex is heterosexual. A bisexual sleeps with both, David only slept with a woman so he was heterosexual.

One doesn't even have to have sex to be in a homosexual relationship

Yes one does according to the dictionary definition and what do you think the ‘sex’ in homosexual means.

.. You have a girlfriend? are you sleeping with her? Is it a heterosexual relationship if you aren't?

Nonsense, I have many fiends who are woman but I am not in heteroSEXual relationships with them. All you can see is sex.

 

[EnemyPartyII]

Dear EnemyPartyII,
If you acepted what the Bible actually says presented before you, you wouldnt see any contradictions. There arent any.

there are hundreds. Dude, its the Bible YOU keep claiming is God written and completely true as written, no further interpretation required...

and if you look at it that way, its PACKED with contradictions...

1. God is satisfied with his works
Gen 1:31
God is dissatisfied with his works.
Gen 6:6
2. God dwells in chosen temples
2 Chron 7:12,16
God dwells not in temples
Acts 7:48
3. God dwells in light
Tim 6:16
God dwells in darkness
1 Kings 8:12/ Ps 18:11/ Ps 97:2
4. God is seen and heard
Ex 33:23/ Ex 33:11/ Gen 3:9,10/ Gen 32:30/ Is 6:1/
Ex 24:9-11
God is invisible and cannot be heard
John 1:18/ John 5:37/ Ex 33:20/ 1 Tim 6:16
5. God is tired and rests
Ex 31:17
God is never tired and never rests
Is 40:28
6. God is everywhere present, sees and knows all things
Prov 15:3/ Ps 139:7-10/ Job 34:22,21
God is not everywhere present, neither sees nor knows all
things
Gen 11:5/ Gen 18:20,21/ Gen 3:8
7. God knows the hearts of men
Acts 1:24/ Ps 139:2,3
God tries men to find out what is in their heart
Deut 13:3/ Deut 8:2/ Gen 22:12
8. God is all powerful
Jer 32:27/ Matt 19:26
God is not all powerful
Judg 1:19
9. God is unchangeable
James 1:17/ Mal 3:6/ Ezek 24:14/ Num 23:19
God is changeable
Gen 6:6/ Jonah 3:10/ 1 Sam 2:30,31/ 2 Kings 20:1,4,5,6/
Ex 33:1,3,17,14
10. God is just and impartial
Ps 92:15/ Gen 18:25/ Deut 32:4/ Rom 2:11/ Ezek 18:25
God is unjust and partial
Gen 9:25/ Ex 20:5/ Rom 9:11-13/ Matt 13:12
11. God is the author of evil
Lam 3:38/ Jer 18:11/ Is 45:7/ Amos 3:6/ Ezek 20:25
God is not the author of evil
1 Cor 14:33/ Deut 32:4/ James 1:13
12. God gives freely to those who ask
James 1:5/ Luke 11:10
God withholds his blessings and prevents men from receiving
them
John 12:40/ Josh 11:20/ Is 63:17
13. God is to be found by those who seek him
Matt 7:8/ Prov 8:17
God is not to be found by those who seek him
Prov 1:28
14. God is warlike
Ex 15:3/ Is 51:15
God is peaceful
Rom 15:33/ 1 Cor 14:33

How many more would you like?

 

[k2svpete]

So then explain all the Biblical contradictions?

How about you present them.

 

[k2svpete]

all the evidence says he was, at the very east, bisexual... on account of his relationship with Jonathon

Rubbish.

 

[EnemyPartyII]

I have looked t up, someone who sleeps with someone of the opposite sex is heterosexual. A bisexual sleeps with both, David only slept with a woman so he was heterosexual.

And he had a homosexual relationship with Jonathon, thus he was bisexual.

Nonsense, I have many fiends who are woman but I am not in heteroSEXual relationships with them. All you can see is sex.

That wasn't the question... Have you ever had a romantic relationship with someone you weren't having sex with?

Was THAT relationship a heterosexual one?

As for "only seeing sex" YOU'RE the one hell bent on condemning other people for their private sex lives... seems your much more blinded by sex than me

 

[EnemyPartyII]

I doubt you came up with even one of those yourself. Stop pretending like you have a grasp of the subject.

hey, lets avoid the content and attack the poster! Yeah! That might work, and draw attention away from the fact that you hve no way to explain away these or myriad other Biblical contradictions

 

[k2svpete]

I doubt you came up with even one of those yourself. Stop pretending like you have a grasp of the subject.

Given the scripture that were cited it is patently obvious that there is vast lack in the understanding of scripture.

 

[EnemyPartyII]

Rubbish.

saying rubish doesn't change the fact.

If you saw any other two men in the same relationship that Jonathon and David were in, you'd recognise it for what it was. Being in the Bible does not render david immune to the laws of reality

 

[Brennin]

hey, lets avoid the content and attack the poster! Yeah! That might work, and draw attention away from the fact that you hve no way to explain away these or myriad other Biblical contradictions

The only fact worth reporting here is that you are out of your depth in this discussion.

 

[k2svpete]

hey, lets avoid the content and attack the poster! Yeah! That might work, and draw attention away from the fact that you hve no way to explain away these or myriad other Biblical contradictions

Oooh I most certainly do but to do so with yourself is to cast pearls before swine. You have made up your mind and will not open it. Therefore it is clearly a waste of time.

 

[EnemyPartyII]

Given the scripture that were cited it is patently obvious that there is vast lack in the understanding of scripture.

good on ya.

and did that make all those nasty Bible contradictions go away?

 

[k2svpete]

saying rubish doesn't change the fact.

If you saw any other two men in the same relationship that Jonathon and David were in, you'd recognise it for what it was. Being in the Bible does not render david immune to the laws of reality

You're absolutely right I would. Two men that have a relationship based on pure love, living out Jesus' commandment to love one another.

Now, no pathetic distortion of this is going to change that fact is it now?

 

[EnemyPartyII]

The only fact worth reporting here is that you are out of your depth in this discussion.

says the guy who hasn't actually addressed a point coherently since he's been here.

Hey, why don't you go google some more advanced physics stuff? I bet theres a bunch more stuff you can misunderstand and pretend says the universe came from nothing!

 

[k2svpete]

good on ya.

and did that make all those nasty Bible contradictions go away?

As I said before, I'd need to sit down and spend some time to explain the intricacies behind those scriptures and as I also said. It would be a waste of time as you do not wish to be educated.

 

[EnemyPartyII]

You're absolutely right I would. Two men that have a relationship based on pure love, living out Jesus' commandment to love one another.

Now, no pathetic distortion of this is going to change that fact is it now?

well... is pointing out that Jesus didn't command that until AFTER David and Jonathon a distortion?

So, its normal for non-homosexualy involved men to kiss each other and declare that their love for each other is greater than that for any woman? Thats not twisting anything, thats asking a question about what the text literally says.