From whatg wer we altered and how did idt happen?
We were altered from a common ancestor with chimps, and it happened through the accumulation of mutations.
You have taken the usual evo rhetoric as the truth by faith alone. We are primates. Our DNA and the DNA of chimps will prove we were never related.
How does our DNA prove we were never related?
WE are mammala but our DNA will veify that we were never in the bear line.
Show us how this is done.
Each exsmple gits more absurd and of course you are just spouting the usual evo rhetoric and have not offered the first bit of evidence to prove what you say.
I offered you genetic evidence. You ignored it. We have offered you fossil evidence, and you once again ignore it. Here it is again:
The most cited example in these forums are ERV's, which are discussed here:
ERVs - Evidence for the Evolutionary Model
The gist of it is that retroviruses insert randomly into the host genome. This can lead to a retroviral insertion becoming a permanent part of the host genome, and can be inherited if it happens in a gamete. As it turns out, humans have just over 200,000 of these retroviral insertions in our genome. We also found that there are about the same number of ERV's in the chimp genome. When we compared them, we found that over 99% of them were found at the same location in each genome. Due to the random nature of viral insertion, it is nearly impossible for these insertions to occur at the same base due to separate infections at such a high rate. The only explanation is that the viral insertion happened once, in a common ancestor.
There are tons of other examples if you want them. For example, all apes, including humans, have the same mutation in our GULO gene that is responsible for vitamin C synthesis which results in none of the apes being able to produce their own vitamin C. Why would we all have the same exact mutation, unless the mutation happened once in a common ancestor?
Now you are making claims that DNA disproves common ancestry, but you offer zero evidence that this is so. Please present this evidence.
Since you know it all about the evolutionary stuff, can you explain how the second life form acquired bones from a parent that did not have bones, did not need bones and did not have a gene for bones?
I will put on my prophecy hat and predict you will not answer that question.
I am not familiar with how the earliest vertebrates evolved bony structures, but given your refusal to deal with the evidence already presented what would be the incentive for me to dig up more evidence that you will ignore? Why don't you deal with the evidence that I presented above, and then we will look at the origin of bones.
