Please, no Sabby talk, I am just trying to understand the Methodology.
SDA friends will quote Jer 31, to bind the Sabbath as law, the 10.
Yet, when asked if they have to keep the festival commands, they say no, all while the reach out of the 10, and declare others in sin, if they eat a shrimp coctail because of Mosaic food restrictions, whereby binding those laws that are not in the 10, all while they say they don't keep festival commands, that are not in the 10, while they uphold the food stuff as law.
So they are semi binding.
With all due respect, is this a pick-n-choose type of methodology? Forgive those words, but I am at a loss for a description.
Why do they add the food stuff on to "what is written on the heart", but not add festival laws to what is written?
Forgive these words, but I just actually don't know what other description fits here, but pick-n-choose.
Again, this is not about the Sabbath, this is about how we are supposed to understand this approach here on our forum.
Is it selection of preference?
It just seeds odd to reach out of the 10, for just some non 10 laws, and bind those also, using Jer 31.
SDA friends will quote Jer 31, to bind the Sabbath as law, the 10.
Yet, when asked if they have to keep the festival commands, they say no, all while the reach out of the 10, and declare others in sin, if they eat a shrimp coctail because of Mosaic food restrictions, whereby binding those laws that are not in the 10, all while they say they don't keep festival commands, that are not in the 10, while they uphold the food stuff as law.
So they are semi binding.
With all due respect, is this a pick-n-choose type of methodology? Forgive those words, but I am at a loss for a description.
Why do they add the food stuff on to "what is written on the heart", but not add festival laws to what is written?
Forgive these words, but I just actually don't know what other description fits here, but pick-n-choose.
Again, this is not about the Sabbath, this is about how we are supposed to understand this approach here on our forum.
Is it selection of preference?
It just seeds odd to reach out of the 10, for just some non 10 laws, and bind those also, using Jer 31.
Last edited: