Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It was never about the Caananites since the OP used it to launch a false attack against atheists.Is this thread even about the Caananites anymore?
You're building something of a straw man. That the Bible contains accounts of real historical events and people is not denied by anyone.
Absolutely nothing, it just proves Thor is real, as it's HIS day.
Nope, the author of Luke just made an error when the tried to force Jesus to being born in Bethlehem. But don't worry, his story falls apart for more reasons that just that.
Sir William Ramseys (staunch atheist) the close associate and comrade of Robert Ingersoll (staunch atheist) spent 10 years challenging Luke-Acts for its historical veracity and went all over exploring the facts and in the end he determined Luke to be a historian most excellent and his facts most sound. So as for the people, places, and events (and timing) mentioned therein these things have been solidly confirmed...but what do any of these diverting topics have to do with this new genetic confirmation of another Biblical truth?
Just KNOW that when Ramseys really took the time to ignore the rhetoric of skeptics and actually pursued the evidence he became a believer.
LolSir William Ramseys (staunch atheist) the close associate and comrade of Robert Ingersoll (staunch atheist) spent 10 years challenging Luke-Acts for its historical veracity and went all over exploring the facts and in the end he determined Luke to be a historian most excellent and his facts most sound. So as for the people, places, and events (and timing) mentioned therein these things have been solidly confirmed...but what do any of these diverting topics have to do with this new genetic confirmation of another Biblical truth?
Just KNOW that when Ramseys (a teacher of the rhetoric of skeptics) really took the time to actually pursue the evidence (in order to once and for all prove it a myth) he became a believer.
It was never about the Caananites since the OP used it to launch a false attack against atheists.
He seems to think that only atheists believed that the Caananites were wiped out, when I have never heard any atheism make such a claim since they really could not care less about this aspect of history.
I have heard Christians claim that they were wiped out and they used some of the same claims that the OP did.
At any rate using the OP to launch a false attack against others guarantees a massive derailment, though it could have been an interesting topic.
Sir William Ramseys (staunch atheist) the close associate and comrade of Robert Ingersoll (staunch atheist) spent 10 years challenging Luke-Acts for its historical veracity and went all over exploring the facts and in the end he determined Luke to be a historian most excellent and his facts most sound. So as for the people, places, and events (and timing) mentioned therein these things have been solidly confirmed...but what do any of these diverting topics have to do with this new genetic confirmation of another Biblical truth?
Just KNOW that when Ramseys (a teacher of the rhetoric of skeptics) really took the time to actually pursue the evidence (in order to once and for all prove it a myth) he became a believer.
I have never heard atheists make that claim. I have heard Christians make that claim.Not at all, I do not claim in the OP or think, that "atheists" are claiming they were wiped out...the OP clearly states that these scientists (atheists or not) claim that is what the Bible claimed (which it does not).
No comment.Cool. People go from being non theist to theist and from theist to non theist all the time. This doesn't tell us much except, people have their own motivation that causes this to happen.
Herrod... oh wait. Wut?!
Except that Ramsay was never an atheist.Sir William Ramseys (staunch atheist) the close associate and comrade of Robert Ingersoll (staunch atheist) spent 10 years challenging Luke-Acts for its historical veracity and went all over exploring the facts and in the end he determined Luke to be a historian most excellent and his facts most sound. So as for the people, places, and events (and timing) mentioned therein these things have been solidly confirmed...but what do any of these diverting topics have to do with this new genetic confirmation of another Biblical truth?
Just KNOW that when Ramseys (a teacher of the rhetoric of skeptics) really took the time to actually pursue the evidence (in order to once and for all prove it a myth) he became a believer.
I have never heard atheists make that claim. I have heard Christians make that claim.
Cool. People go from being non theist to theist and from theist to non theist all the time. This doesn't tell us much except, people have their own motivation that causes this to happen.
Is this thread even about the Caananites anymore?