A new error

pshun2404

Newbie
Jan 26, 2012
6,026
620
✟78,299.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Ancient DNA counters biblical account of the mysterious Canaanites, written by Lizzie Wade, Science News (Jul. 27, 2017) shows the level of not well thought out prejudice and misunderstanding about the Biblical record of alleged events. Misstating that they may have once for all put to bed what they consider a myth. They somehow believe (apparently not having read the account for themselves) that the Bible claims that the Israelites had wiped out the Canaanites thus eliminating them from the gene pool. Only an anti-Semitic anti-Bible, uneducated bafoonary could interpret what is said in such a way.

They indicate genes found in the bones of ancient people from Sidon, Lebanon, Jordan, and elsewhere show distinct DNA markers proving once and for all that Canaanite genes had continued, but where does the Bible EVER say ALL Canaanites were eliminated? It does not.

The Bible speaks of the end of Canaanite rule following their usurping of areas of the Promised Land given to the heirs of Abraham which was left vulnerable after Jacob and his children left that area of the Levant. When they returned to the land around 1450 BC shortly thereafter the Bible says that Joshua and his armies conquered and wiped out the 5 main city-state Kingdoms and in other cases having been attacked wiped out peoples from those groups. Of course the people Sidon and Tyre continued to exist for 100s of years (beyond Solomon) as did Lebanon and what we now call Jordan, Human beings are sexual and social beings, so why would anyone assume the Bible was claiming there would not have been interactions between groups that were near to one another?

A second error was the source location of the Canaanites. We already knew as the ancient Greeks had also said that they were from the east. The scientists here say no but probably from near to Iran (hello...Iraq and Iran were called the East). More importantly, where did these Canaanite people get the lineage association with some ancient make named Canaan? Canaan was noted as being an offspring of the one we call Noah, as were the Assyrians (from Assur), the Hittites (of Heth), the Kushites (from Cush) and so on.

So in effect they have actually confirmed the Bible’s story not put it to rest in any way. See http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017...ly_2017-07-27&et_rid=321869197&et_cid=1463033
 

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,625
81
St Charles, IL
✟347,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Ancient DNA counters biblical account of the mysterious Canaanites, written by Lizzie Wade, Science News (Jul. 27, 2017) shows the level of not well thought out prejudice and misunderstanding about the Biblical record of alleged events. Misstating that they may have once for all put to bed what they consider a myth. They somehow believe (apparently not having read the account for themselves) that the Bible claims that the Israelites had wiped out the Canaanites thus eliminating them from the gene pool. Only an anti-Semitic anti-Bible, uneducated bafoonary could interpret what is said in such a way.

They indicate genes found in the bones of ancient people from Sidon, Lebanon, Jordan, and elsewhere show distinct DNA markers proving once and for all that Canaanite genes had continued, but where does the Bible EVER say ALL Canaanites were eliminated? It does not.

The Bible speaks of the end of Canaanite rule following their usurping of areas of the Promised Land given to the heirs of Abraham which was left vulnerable after Jacob and his children left that area of the Levant. When they returned to the land around 1450 BC shortly thereafter the Bible says that Joshua and his armies conquered and wiped out the 5 main city-state Kingdoms and in other cases having been attacked wiped out peoples from those groups. Of course the people Sidon and Tyre continued to exist for 100s of years (beyond Solomon) as did Lebanon and what we now call Jordan, Human beings are sexual and social beings, so why would anyone assume the Bible was claiming there would not have been interactions between groups that were near to one another?

A second error was the source location of the Canaanites. We already knew as the ancient Greeks had also said that they were from the east. The scientists here say no but probably from near to Iran (hello...Iraq and Iran were called the East). More importantly, where did these Canaanite people get the lineage association with some ancient make named Canaan? Canaan was noted as being an offspring of the one we call Noah, as were the Assyrians (from Assur), the Hittites (of Heth), the Kushites (from Cush) and so on.

So in effect they have actually confirmed the Bible’s story not put it to rest in any way. See http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017...ly_2017-07-27&et_rid=321869197&et_cid=1463033
You're building something of a straw man. That the Bible contains accounts of real historical events and people is not denied by anyone.
 
Upvote 0

Korean-American Christian

raised Presbyterian. member of the Nazarene Church
Feb 21, 2017
2,157
2,996
USA
✟17,856.00
Country
United States
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Green
Ancient DNA counters biblical account of the mysterious Canaanites, written by Lizzie Wade, Science News (Jul. 27, 2017) shows the level of not well thought out prejudice and misunderstanding about the Biblical record of alleged events. Misstating that they may have once for all put to bed what they consider a myth. They somehow believe (apparently not having read the account for themselves) that the Bible claims that the Israelites had wiped out the Canaanites thus eliminating them from the gene pool. Only an anti-Semitic anti-Bible, uneducated bafoonary could interpret what is said in such a way.

They indicate genes found in the bones of ancient people from Sidon, Lebanon, Jordan, and elsewhere show distinct DNA markers proving once and for all that Canaanite genes had continued, but where does the Bible EVER say ALL Canaanites were eliminated? It does not.

The Bible speaks of the end of Canaanite rule following their usurping of areas of the Promised Land given to the heirs of Abraham which was left vulnerable after Jacob and his children left that area of the Levant. When they returned to the land around 1450 BC shortly thereafter the Bible says that Joshua and his armies conquered and wiped out the 5 main city-state Kingdoms and in other cases having been attacked wiped out peoples from those groups. Of course the people Sidon and Tyre continued to exist for 100s of years (beyond Solomon) as did Lebanon and what we now call Jordan, Human beings are sexual and social beings, so why would anyone assume the Bible was claiming there would not have been interactions between groups that were near to one another?

A second error was the source location of the Canaanites. We already knew as the ancient Greeks had also said that they were from the east. The scientists here say no but probably from near to Iran (hello...Iraq and Iran were called the East). More importantly, where did these Canaanite people get the lineage association with some ancient make named Canaan? Canaan was noted as being an offspring of the one we call Noah, as were the Assyrians (from Assur), the Hittites (of Heth), the Kushites (from Cush) and so on.

So in effect they have actually confirmed the Bible’s story not put it to rest in any way. See http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017...ly_2017-07-27&et_rid=321869197&et_cid=1463033

I agree with Speedwell.

The Bible contains accounts of real historical events and real people.

Jesus Christ, the Son of God, is a real-life person in history.
Who Was the Historical Jesus | Christianity


And though a manger may or may not have figured prominently in the birth, scholars do agree that Jesus was born between 2 B.C. and 7 B.C. as part of the peasant class in a small village called Nazareth in Galilee. Historians also back the claim that Joseph, Jesus' father, was a carpenter, meaning Jesus would have gone into the family profession as well.

We have B.C. (Before Christ) and A.D. (Anno Domini), which means year of our Lord
slide_37.jpg
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

HitchSlap

PROUDLY PRIMATE
Aug 6, 2012
14,723
5,468
✟281,096.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I agree with Speedwell.

The Bible contains accounts of real historical events and real people.

Jesus Christ, the Son of God, is a real-life person in history.

That is the reason we have B.C. (Before Christ) and A.D. (Anno Domini), which means year of our Lord
View attachment 202826
What's reason we have "Thursday"?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Astrophile
Upvote 0

Desk trauma

Front row at the dumpster fire of the republic
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
20,374
16,346
✟1,186,098.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
That is the reason we have B.C. (Before Christ) and A.D. (Anno Domini), which means year of our Lord
Just like how it being juche 106 demonstrates all the claims about the great leader are true.
 
Upvote 0

Korean-American Christian

raised Presbyterian. member of the Nazarene Church
Feb 21, 2017
2,157
2,996
USA
✟17,856.00
Country
United States
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Green
Just like how it being juche 106 demonstrates all the claims about the great leader are true.

That's funny :D:D:D:D

By the way, my parents are from South Korea....not North Korea :):):):)
874d101e720b011f2e628b8717f5fb65.gif
 
Upvote 0

Korean-American Christian

raised Presbyterian. member of the Nazarene Church
Feb 21, 2017
2,157
2,996
USA
✟17,856.00
Country
United States
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Green
What's reason we have "Thursday"?

The reason we have Thursday, and all days....the reason we wake up every morning is because we have a Creator who loves his creation - which includes human beings
Jesus.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: HitchSlap
Upvote 0

HitchSlap

PROUDLY PRIMATE
Aug 6, 2012
14,723
5,468
✟281,096.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
The reason we have Thursday, and all days....the reason we wake up every morning is because we have a Creator who loves his creation - which includes human beings
...and according to your logic, it's proof Thor exists.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Waterwerx

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2016
656
255
38
Hazleton, PA
✟56,259.00
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Single
Absolutely nothing, it just proves Thor is real, as it's HIS day.
I'm sure he will be along shortly to hammer out our differences.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,046
51,497
Guam
✟4,907,063.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
scholars do agree that Jesus was born between 2 B.C. and 7 B.C.
Scholars are idiots.

Daniel gave us a way to calculate the exact year; but as usual scholars have to muddy the waters.

Scholars even change the name of the governor who was in office at the time, then wander around scratching their heads as to when the governor was in office.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,046
51,497
Guam
✟4,907,063.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
He's as real as any god/s, I suppose. I mean, with you guys, perception is reality, right?
Then why did you bring it up, like it was supposed to prove something wrong?
 
Upvote 0

HitchSlap

PROUDLY PRIMATE
Aug 6, 2012
14,723
5,468
✟281,096.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Scholars are idiots.

Daniel gave us a way to calculate the exact year; but as usual scholars have to muddy the waters.

Scholars even change the name of the governor who was in office at the time, then wander around scratching their heads as to when the governor was in office.
Maybe he was born twice? We all know the bible never contradicts itself, so both anonymous authors must be right.
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,628
12,068
✟230,461.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Scholars are idiots.

Daniel gave us a way to calculate the exact year; but as usual scholars have to muddy the waters.

Scholars even change the name of the governor who was in office at the time, then wander around scratching their heads as to when the governor was in office.

Nope, the author of Luke just made an error when the tried to force Jesus to being born in Bethlehem. But don't worry, his story falls apart for more reasons that just that.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums