A new error

[AV1611VET]

Nope, the author of Luke just made an error when the tried to force Jesus to being born in Bethlehem.

So the prophecy is still awaiting fulfillment?

 

[Subduction Zone]

So the prophecy is still awaiting fulfillment?

That "prophecy" has been interpreted in all sorts of ways. In fact it is thought to be history, an event that happened before it was written, by many scholars.

 

[HitchSlap]

So the prophecy is still awaiting fulfillment?

Exactly. 'Cause we all know the bible's never wrong.

 

[lesliedellow]

What's reason we have "Thursday"?

What's the reason Germans have Donnerstag?

 

[HitchSlap]

Speaking of that, have you ever heard the saying:

He who is born once, dies twice; he who is born twice, dies once.

Indeed, I have!

Have you ever heard the saying:

"Fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again."

 

[HitchSlap]

What's the reason Germans have Donnerstag?

I have no idea, but I assume it's something to do with beer!

 

[AV1611VET]

That "prophecy" has been interpreted in all sorts of ways. In fact it is thought to be history, an event that happened before it was written, by many scholars.

I'm confused.

Are you now saying Luke didn't make an error?

After all, it's not that hard to force-fit a prophecy that 'happened before it was written,' is it?

 

[AV1611VET]

Exactly. 'Cause we all know the bible's never wrong.

So according to science the Jews need to go back into captivity, don't they?

 

[AV1611VET]

Indeed, I have!

Have you ever heard the saying:

"Fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again."

Um ... no.

I believe it goes:

Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, sham on me.

 

[HitchSlap]

I'm confused.

Understandable. Stick with your "boolean standards."

Are you now saying Luke didn't make an error?

I'm not one to point fingers... buuuuut...

After all, it's not that hard to force-fit a prophecy that 'happened before it was written,' is it?

You guys would know.

 

[HitchSlap]

Um ... no.

I believe it goes:

Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, sham on me.

Orly?
@48 sec.

 

[HitchSlap]

So according to science the Jews need to go back into captivity, don't they?

You really don't like Jews, do you?

 

[AV1611VET]

You really don't like Jews, do you?

Nice try.

Well ... for the record ... I love flashing anti-Zionists this sign:

¡ JERUSALEM !​

Neat, isn't it?

 

[Strathos]

I agree that the Bible never says the Caananites were completely wiped out.

 

[bhsmte]

Absolutely nothing, it just proves Thor is real, as it's HIS day.

And Wednesday, is Prince spaghetti day.

 

[HitchSlap]

Nice try.

 

[HitchSlap]

And Wednesday, is Prince spaghetti day.

Yes! Someone who gets it.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I'm confused.

Are you now saying Luke didn't make an error?

After all, it's not that hard to force-fit a prophecy that 'happened before it was written,' is it?

No, it is clear that the author of Luke, who may or may not have been Luke (who never was an eyewitness at any rate) made an error at best.

That would be the least of his "crimes". Misinterpreting Daniel only adds to them.

 

[juvenissun]

Absolutely nothing, it just proves Thor is real, as it's HIS day.

OK, thanks. It is the Thor's day. (why is the Thor listed at the 5th?)

Thor is real. So what?

 

[AV1611VET]

That would be the least of his "crimes". Misinterpreting Daniel only adds to them.

Then you calculate it and tell me the year.

Or are you afraid you'll err as well?

Luke didn't have any 21st century technology at his disposal ... you do.

So it should be a piece of cake.