I should say, we choose to believe everything we choose to believe!
I believe what I am convinced of.
Let me illustrate the difference:
Robert E. Lee was a man of many talents and advantages. He was rich, smart, and well educated. He thought slavery was wrong, and he thought secession was a mistake. Nevertheless, he fought for the Confederacy. He said it was a matter of "honor".
Had he not fought for the Confederacy, he would have alienated friends and family. He "chose" to fight for the South. He was also religious, but forgot that no man can serve two masters. He valued the good opinion of others, more than what he believed was right. To deceive himself, he called it "honor"
George Thomas was also a Virginian, not so advantaged as Lee, but he fought for the Union because he was convinced of the Union cause. This alienated many of his friends and family.
Religious persons (and patriots), "choose" to believe nonsense, because professing unbelief would alienate friends and family, and bring them face-to-face with fears of personal death and insignificance. They take a position from self-interest and then carefully choose what facts they will consider and what flawed logic they can tolerate to support their chosen position.
They cannot imaging anyone acting differently. The call this belief in unproven and absurd notions "faith" and hold it to be a great virtue.
Scientific persons believe because they are convinced by evidence and reasoning. They test their assumptions by comparing them with reality.
