911 Towers Were Exploded Outwards, Not Collapsed

Btodd · Jun 28, 2011

RealDealNeverstop said:
Rotfl!! Where are the people with less experience than hanjour who duplicated his flight path???

Since this is a game to you anyway, and you have no intention of a real discussion...

Originally Posted by Btodd

I actually gave an argument, and you didn't like it. When asked to do the same thing, you made a joke out of who flew Flight 77. Classy stuff.

Now you've moved on to the Sharpshooter Fallacy, after previously having your mind blown by the fact that hitting one side of a 5-sided building was 20%. I think that says it all, sport.

Btodd

RealDealNeverstop · Jun 28, 2011

Btodd said:
Since this is a game to you anyway, and you have no intention of a real discussion...

Originally Posted by Btodd

I actually gave an argument, and you didn't like it. When asked to do the same thing, you made a joke out of who flew Flight 77. Classy stuff.

Now you've moved on to the Sharpshooter Fallacy, after previously having your mind blown by the fact that hitting one side of a 5-sided building was 20%. I think that says it all, sport.

Btodd

So you can't back up your claim that people with less experience than hanjour duplicated his flight path. Thanks!!

Btodd · Jun 28, 2011

RealDealNeverstop said:
So you can't back up your claim that people with less experience than hanjour duplicated his flight path. Thanks!!

Hey, even if I can't...I don't resort to faking moral outrage to get out of a bind (only to return within minutes), or turn 'who flew Flight 77' into a Paris Hilton joke to get out of the same bind.

You can high-five yourself in the mirror for your perceived victory, but I still find it to be devoid of honesty or class.

Btodd

Trogdor the Burninator · Jun 28, 2011

So are we back to the ninjas installing radio control gear onto an in-service jet after judo-chopping maintenance personnel so jet can be remote hijacked and crashed, or the substitute radar-invisible 757 replaces real jet while passengers are flown invisbly to secret base and executed theory?

It's so hard to keep up.

RealDealNeverstop · Jun 28, 2011

Trogdor the Burninator said:
So are we back to the ninjas installing radio control gear onto an in-service jet after judo-chopping maintenance personnel so jet can be remote hijacked and crashed, or the substitute radar-invisible 757 replaces real jet while passengers are flown invisbly to secret base and executed theory?

It's so hard to keep up.

Lol.....yep....make it sound impossible an inside job could have happened....all while cheering the claim some ragtags pulled off a sophisticated attack.

RealDealNeverstop · Jun 28, 2011

Btodd said:
Hey, even if I can't...I don't resort to faking moral outrage to get out of a bind (only to return within minutes), or turn 'who flew Flight 77' into a Paris Hilton joke to get out of the same bind.

You can high-five yourself in the mirror for your perceived victory, but I still find it to be devoid of honesty or class.

Btodd

If you can't? Lol! We know you can't yet you can't retract the claim because it would mean reconciling the flight path with hanjour's very laughable flight history capabilities.

pgp_protector · Jun 28, 2011

RealDealNeverstop said:
Wow.......I mean....wow!!! I dont have the patience to fully educate right now but I will point out the commercial cert he had was in question and it only allows someone to BEGIN TRAINING on jets like a 757. You really need to learn the subject before embarrassing yourself. He got rejected by schools he had already attended because he was such a poor student so your commercial cert celebration is simply, sad.

To prove my point, tell us what kind of plane he used to obtain his supposed cert? Can you do it off the top of your head? We know you can't.

I'm sorry, I didn't think you had to be a great student to crash a Jet.

I <3 Abraham · Jun 28, 2011

Wow, this thread is still near the top. Paging doctor alien Elvis, you are needed in thread coo coo.

RealDealNeverstop · Jun 28, 2011

pgp_protector said:
I'm sorry, I didn't think you had to be a great student to crash a Jet.

Love the intellectual dishonesty.

Don't waste my time anymore.

RealDealNeverstop · Jun 28, 2011

I <3 Abraham said:
Wow, this thread is still near the top. Paging doctor alien Elvis, you are needed in thread coo coo.

It's still at the top because I've been making the mistake of thinking there is anyone sincere about debating the issue.

Defensor Fidei · Jun 28, 2011

There are a lot of unanswered questions about 9/11, but is there any real point to debating it at this point? It's not going to change anything. The war in Iraq alone is enough to justify locking up every member of the Bush-Cheney administration and throwing away the key. But the people in power never seem to face justice on earth.

RealDealNeverstop · Jun 28, 2011

Defensor Fidei said:
There are a lot of unanswered questions about 9/11, but is there any real point to debating it at this point? It's not going to change anything. The war in Iraq alone is enough to justify locking up every member of the Bush-Cheney administration and throwing away the key. But the people in power never seem to face justice on earth.

I do it for two reasons: to find out as much new info as possible and to help others see the official version is at best highly questionable. Both are worth it.

Btodd · Jun 28, 2011

RealDealNeverstop said:
Love the intellectual dishonesty.

Of course you do, you've been practicing it from the very start. Thanks for the admission, it's the closest to honesty you've gotten.

Btodd

Btodd · Jun 28, 2011

So, in case RealDeal's continual evasion of the question fooled anyone, he thinks a plane was remote-control flown into the newly-remodeled section of the Pentagon in order to minimize the loss of life, but still give the shock factor required.

That's the only way 'intended' works in the statement he gave, unless he wants to convince us that a real pilot was inside the plane, flying to his own death while trying to 'minimize the loss of life'.

ManFromUncle has no problem being that honest; I can at least respect him in that regard.

Now, watch the 'but, but no I didn't say that!' show. Of course you didn't. It's just the only available option given your statement, and I can't even coax a tiny little bit of honesty out of you on the matter, after you complained about everyone else's sincerity. Pot, kettle and all that.

Btodd

RealDealNeverstop · Jun 28, 2011

Btodd said:
So, in case RealDeal's continual evasion of the question fooled anyone, he thinks a plane was remote-control flown into the newly-remodeled section of the Pentagon in order to minimize the loss of life, but still give the shock factor required.

That's the only way 'intended' works in the statement he gave, unless he wants to convince us that a real pilot was inside the plane, flying to his own death while trying to 'minimize the loss of life'.

ManFromUncle has no problem being that honest; I can at least respect him in that regard.

Now, watch the 'but, but no I didn't say that!' show. Of course you didn't. It's just the only available option given your statement, and I can't even coax a tiny little bit of honesty out of you on the matter, after you complained about everyone else's sincerity. Pot, kettle and all that.

Btodd

You should take your personal obsession with me to a new thread.

Btodd · Jun 28, 2011

RealDealNeverstop said:
You should take your personal obsession with me to a new thread.

No need; I just articulated what you didn't have the courage to. Remote-control planes. You're welcome.

Btodd

Trogdor the Burninator · Jun 28, 2011

RealDealNeverstop said:
Lol.....yep....make it sound impossible an inside job could have happened....all while cheering the claim some ragtags pulled off a sophisticated attack.

Hijacking a plane and crashing it into a target - both of which have been done before, on multiple occasions by various groups and/or individuals of varying skill levels versus a massive conspiracy all hinging on non-discovery using methods that have never been carried out and requiring extremely sophisitcated planning and execution.

Yep - I know which makes sense.

RealDealNeverstop · Jun 28, 2011

Trogdor the Burninator said:
Hijacking a plane and crashing it into a target - both of which have been done before, on multiple occasions by various groups and/or individuals of varying skill levels versus a massive conspiracy all hinging on non-discovery using methods that have never been carried out and requiring extremely sophisitcated planning and execution.

Yep - I know which makes sense.

Like I said, try to make it sound like an inside job was impossible while a completely unprecedented terrorist attack took place by a group of ragtags.

Trogdor the Burninator · Jun 28, 2011

RealDealNeverstop said:
Like I said, try to make it sound like an inside job was impossible while a completely unprecedented terrorist attack took place by a group of ragtags.

More like a completely unprecedented inside job versus an often perpetrated plane hijacking, but whatever.

RealDealNeverstop · Jun 29, 2011

Trogdor the Burninator said:
More like a completely unprecedented inside job versus an often perpetrated plane hijacking, but whatever.

So now 9/11 is reduced to nothing but a mere plane hijacking......niicce!!! Then you say unprecedented inside job? Lol!! Have you never read about the history of false flags? Have you never read Op Northwoods?

911 Towers Were Exploded Outwards, Not Collapsed

Well-Known Member

Is Prayer Your First or Last Action?

Well-Known Member

Senior Veteran

Is Prayer Your First or Last Action?

Is Prayer Your First or Last Action?

Noted strange person

Go Cubbies!

Is Prayer Your First or Last Action?

Is Prayer Your First or Last Action?

Well-Known Member

Is Prayer Your First or Last Action?

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Is Prayer Your First or Last Action?

Well-Known Member

Senior Veteran

Is Prayer Your First or Last Action?

Senior Veteran

Is Prayer Your First or Last Action?

Similar threads

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency