911 Towers Were Exploded Outwards, Not Collapsed

[Btodd]

I agree with Realdeal that Btodd is not a sincere poster and is not worth bothering with, it is obvious his task is to keep sidetracking the discussion by saying things like "thermite dude! It can do anything!" (his exact words), so the rest of us should just ignore him.

While the pot is busy calling the kettle black, I will remind you that aside from not touching any of the questions I put to you after posting Pentagon debris, the light poles, the witnesses, etc...oldbetang put a direct question to you about Operation Northwoods, and you copy&pasted an NFL football player in place of your own response.

And here you are, copy&pasting the same post you've already pasted multiple times - AGAIN.

After Trogdor asked you about 7 straight questions, this was your evasive reply:

"Glad you are paying attention now, and you show your desperation by throwing out a lot of questions which make no sense, so can be dismissed."

That says it all, cupcake. You don't need to lecture anyone on honesty or sincerity, and neither does RealDeal. Go back and address those questions, if you really wanna feign intellectual honesty.

Here. Invest in one of these:

Btodd

 

[Trogdor the Burninator]

However, it is valuable as a lesson in how disinformation works, and proof of how terrified the perpetrators are that a critical mass consensus will be reached that the official story is false.

And yet one guy who has openly threatened to expose the whole conspiracy in court walks around in public without any fear for his safety, in a country run by the very same government that supposedly killed 2500 people.

Conclusion - either he is the dumbest person on Earth, or the american government has the worst secret service ever.

 

[RealDealNeverstop]

And yet one guy who has openly threatened to expose the whole conspiracy in court walks around in public without any fear for his safety, in a country run by the very same government that supposedly killed 2500 people.

Conclusion - either he is the dumbest person on Earth, or the american government has the worst secret service ever.

And if the guy dies from a car accident it will mean nothing. Just like the truther/family member who turned down the payout money then died in a plane crash.

Eta: I love how your camps creates the "same government" strawman. I can't speak for all truthers but a false flag does not require thousands of people....or even hundreds. So why pretend it is the whole government? Is it to maintain the OCT?

 

[spiritman1]

And yet one guy who has openly threatened to expose the whole conspiracy in court walks around in public without any fear for his safety, in a country run by the very same government that supposedly killed 2500 people.

Conclusion - either he is the dumbest person on Earth, or the american government has the worst secret service ever.

on the contrary! if he would of kept it to just a few personal friends of his intentions to expose the truth he would be dead already, by going public he bought himself a little time, now they have burden of either discrediting him or killing him in a manor that will either appear accidental or one of natural causes

 

[Btodd]

on the contrary! if he would of kept it to just a few personal friends of his intentions to expose the truth he would be dead already, by going public he bought himself a little time, now they have burden of either discrediting him or killing him in a manor that will either appear accidental or one of natural causes

They don't have the burden of anything; so far he's made an unsubstantiated claim. "A general told me so", as uttered on the Alex Jones show, isn't exactly cause for anyone quaking in their boots.

Just another smoking gun that will never materialize.


Btodd

 

[RealDealNeverstop]

They don't have the burden of anything; so far he's made an unsubstantiated claim. "A general told me so", as uttered on the Alex Jones show, isn't exactly cause for anyone quaking in their boots.

Just another smoking gun that will never materialize.


Btodd

More intellectual dishonesty. He said he was willing to give the name of the general while testifying under oath.

 

[Btodd]

More intellectual dishonesty. He said he was willing to give the name of the general while testifying under oath.

Never said he didn't, but it will merely be his word against the general's if it comes down to such a thing (and you know it won't, so don't play dumb).

Of course, with such hard evidence...the first logical step is to take it to the Alex Jones show. I'm really sold on this, aren't you? Wait, don't answer that.

Your claims of intellectual dishonesty are rather hollow, Texas Sharpshooter.


Btodd

 

[Skaloop]

More intellectual dishonesty. He said he was willing to give the name of the general while testifying under oath.

He can still do that later. Why not give it now informally, then under oath when the time comes?

 

[RealDealNeverstop]

He can still do that later. Why not give it now informally, then under oath when the time comes?

Common sense sprouts. Doing it outside a courtroom tips the hand too much because it allows a lot of time to neutralize the information. My point is it was intellectually dishonest to mislead readers in to thinking all he said was he knows of a General when clearly that is very different from him stating he is willing to name the General under oath.

 

[ManFromUncle]

Common sense sprouts. Doing it outside a courtroom tips the hand too much because it allows a lot of time to neutralize the information. My point is it was intellectually dishonest to mislead readers in to thinking all he said was he knows of a General when clearly that is very different from him stating he is willing to name the General under oath.

Intellectual dishonesty is all they've got. The truth is coming out. Question, if I'm a 911 Truther, what does that make the disinformationists? 911 Liars?

 

[ManFromUncle]

While the pot is busy calling the kettle black, I will remind you that aside from not touching any of the questions I put to you after posting Pentagon debris, the light poles, the witnesses, etc...oldbetang put a direct question to you about Operation Northwoods, and you copy&pasted an NFL football player in place of your own response.

What about Operation Northwoods? I don't think that helps your "case," although you don't really have one just a lot of smoke-blowing. Do you still think all those 20-tons assemblies of steel Just kind of "snapped" and flew out sideways for 2 football fields at 70 MPH (look at photo in original post)? It is necessary to repeat questions and information for you because you never address the ones you don't like, typical disinfo.

 

[Btodd]

What about Operation Northwoods? I don't think that helps your "case," although you don't really have one just a lot of smoke-blowing. Do you still think all those 20-tons assemblies of steel Just kind of "snapped" and flew out sideways for 2 football fields at 70 MPH (look at photo in original post)? It is necessary to repeat questions and information for you because you never address the ones you don't like, typical disinfo.

His point was that Operation Northwoods never happened, and I did address how debris from the upper block is forced outward when it hit the lower block. There are actual science papers that you can read about this, instead of petitions, if you really want to understand it.


Btodd

 

[RealDealNeverstop]

His point was that Operation Northwoods never happened, and I did address how debris from the upper block is forced outward when it hit the lower block. There are actual science papers that you can read about this, instead of petitions, if you really want to understand it.


Btodd

Of course it doesn't matter to your camp the ON documents proves our top military leaders clearly planned a false flag attack, some of which happened verbatim on 9/11.

 

[Btodd]

Of course it doesn't matter to your camp the ON documents proves our top military leaders clearly planned a false flag attack, some of which happened verbatim on 9/11.

I love the logic...a conspiracy that never happened is supposed to count as evidence of another conspiracy (which also never happened).

You do not move one inch toward proving '9/11 was an inside job' by naming some supposed past event. You can either show it, or you cannot...


Btodd

 

[RealDealNeverstop]

I love the logic...a conspiracy that never happened is supposed to count as evidence of another conspiracy (which also never happened).

You do not move one inch toward proving '9/11 was an inside job' by naming some supposed past event. You can either show it, or you cannot...


Btodd

Like I said, none of the facts highlighted matter to your camp.

 

[Btodd]

Like I said, none of the facts highlighted matter to your camp.

Right. Because my 'camp' understands that showing that the sun rose on a particular day in 1954 has no bearing on showing that the sun rose TODAY. You guys have a very strange understanding of the burden of proof.


Btodd

 

[RealDealNeverstop]

Right. Because my 'camp' understands that showing that the sun rose on a particular day in 1954 has no bearing on showing that the sun rose TODAY. You guys have a very strange understanding of the burden of proof.


Btodd

ON and some of it happening on 9/11 exactly as it had been written means nothing to your camp bcause you dont have the guts to admit our nation's top military leaders planned on attacking the US. To honest people it would, in the very least, show a false flag is not as crazy as your camp tries to make it.

 

[mzungu]

It never ceases to amaze me how people totally disregard the physics in cases such as the collapse of the twin towers. The compressed air (volume and speed of compression factor) was enough to force debris out in a manner closely resembling the action of an explosion.

The only conspiracy; If there was one would be the disregard of the warning given by MOSAD and the knowledge that Al Quaida was planning an attack on American soil. Any flight school which had students who wanted only to learn to take off and fly a plane but not how to land it should have rang warning bells at the FBI Headquarters.

Perhaps it was a blessing in disguise for the Bush administration since after the attack Bush was given Carte Blanche to do almost anything he pleased. Perhaps his admin knew of the attack and allowed it to happen in order to be given the green light by both houses to conduct a foreign policy that Bush wanted so badly.

However this does in no way indicate that the towers were brought down by explosives.

I seriously doubt if any skyscraper can survive the impact of a modern jetliner loaded with fuel.

 

[RealDealNeverstop]

It never ceases to amaze me how people totally disregard the physics in cases such as the collapse of the twin towers. The compressed air (volume and speed of compression factor) was enough to force debris out in a manner closely resembling the action of an explosion.

The only conspiracy; If there was one would be the disregard of the warning given by MOSAD and the knowledge that Al Quaida was planning an attack on American soil. Any flight school which had students who wanted only to learn to take off and fly a plane but not how to land it should have rang warning bells at the FBI Headquarters.

Perhaps it was a blessing in disguise for the Bush administration since after the attack Bush was given Carte Blanche to do almost anything he pleased. Perhaps his admin knew of the attack and allowed it to happen in order to be given the green light by both houses to conduct a foreign policy that Bush wanted so badly.

However this does in no way indicate that the towers were brought down by explosives.

I seriously doubt if any skyscraper can survive the impact of a modern jetliner loaded with fuel.

The planes weren't "loaded" with fuel and those humongous fireballs seen on impact was the jet fuel burning up.

 

[mzungu]

The planes weren't "loaded" with fuel and those humongous fireballs seen on impact was the jet fuel burning up.

"Loaded" as in having full tanks! I thought it was obvious that this is what was meant as "loaded with fuel".