So you are saying that the sequence in Genesis matches the sequence discovered by science?
Umm... what? The sequence is not "correct". It's all mixed up. Again and again the sequence in Genesis is completely mismatched from science if read literally.
Some examples, by day of "creation":
Initial State
Watery abyss
wrong - Land has always existed on Earth
1 Light (no Sun yet)
wrong - Light without sun?
2 Firmament/inverted bowl
wrong - Hebrew word shows this to be solid, but there has never been a solid dome over the earth.
3 Dry land, then All land plants
wrong - sea animals preceded land plants
4 Moon, Sun, stars and the whole universe
wrong - Those existed long before life and most of the other things made in days 1-3.
5 Aquatic Animals & Birds
wrong - Birds were not before animals on land.
6 Land animals and humans
But this is a different order than
Genesis 2.
7 Rest
Just like any other primitive creation story, some things are right here and there - especially since most of these stories (as shown above) go from simpler to complex, as makes sense.
Our story isn't anywhere close to being right. The most accurate stories are by religions made up recently - like scientology. But that, of course, only means that we knew more when they made up the religion, not that scientology is right.
The point of the story is a refutation of the Babylonian creation story - which the Genesis story follows, and scholars recognized it as being a reflection of. It's a clarification by God that God is the one doing the creating, not the Babylonian gods. Taking it literally both misses God's point as well as not matching what's been found by science.
In Christ-
Papias