I don't understand what you are talking about. What was flawed you said and what do I require to be infinite?
Obviously it cannot. However, nobody claims such things, so where did you get this idea from?
I mean, how do you imagine a distance to be infinite in a singularity when in fact, all distances are zero in singularity - which is part of the definition, in the first place, of a singularity in a manifold? The curvature must, as a necessary, be infinite in a singularity, so what is your problem with this kind of infinity?
And whoever claimed such things as infinite distance even exists?
In any case, as you might realize, I don't understand what it is you trying to say, because it does not make much sense to me, so can you please clarify?
Only fermiones require space (Pauli's exclusion principles holds true for them) but why do you assume a fermionic gas existed at the begging of time?
For instance an infinite number of bosons can occupy the same point, i.e. a singularity.... An example of such boson gas is photons in an electromagnetic field - such as light, radio waves, x-rays, gamma-rays etc.
Do you think your room gets tighter in some way when you switch on the light? How much light do you think it is possible to fill a room with?
I do no understand what it is you are trying to ask or claim here, but the "something from nothing" argument is a Straw Man. Because, according to the theory of general theory there was no such thing as "something came from nothing", there has always been something. According to the theory of general relativity, a singularity is not nothing, it is something existing as a singularity. Which was exactly what was said in the quote and statement I made in my original post...
For clarity I quote Robert M. Wald again: our failure to describe a singularity as a "place" in precise mathematical terms does not in any way lessen the obvious fact that singularities exist
That said observation and Quantum Mechanics tells use things can be created from nothing and that effects does not need to have a cause.
Like I said, the universe does not care what we think is is possible and what we believe it can do...
I don't understand you. Is this a question or statement? If it was a question, what is it I require to be infinite and to be measurable?