Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I thought there was a term for it --- (thank you).It wasn't a "pixel." It was a singularity.
I thought there was a term for it --- (thank you).
But "singularity" doesn't do justice to its size just before it expanded.
How does what result..?? The way that we guage the change that either was or will be is by the bible, compared to how we see it now work. In the case of the past, we also have observers. The very early records of man, that clearly denote key differences.How does this result show that there was "a change that happened," and how exactly do you figure that it is the type of change you appear to have already decided on beforehand?
Let's look at the hebrew word, shall we? Here is what it actually meansI am not being "cheeky" at all. No where in scripture is thought or emotion associated with the brain or the head. No where. It is always associated with the heart.
Wait..if God changed not just a pool, or an arm of man, etc, but the universe of man, this is now not a miracle? Let's see you change it back, then..You were not referring to miracles when you came up with the "Pre-Split Non-PO World" idea. Are you changing your tune now? Doesn't God carry out miracles after the "Split?"
Yes, hypocritical in the extreme.You mean "speck" --- not "box"?
Remember: these guys, who claim the entire universe could fit inside a pixel, whine because all the animals couldn't have fit aboard the Ark.
[I know --- volume is relative ---]
Rep time ---Yes, hypocritical in the extreme.
They rub their magic lamp when it seems convenient.
Let's look at the hebrew word, shall we? Here is what it actually means
Do you, then think God has a physical organ too!!!?
Ge 8:21 - And the LORD smelled a sweet savour; and the LORD said in his heart, I will not again curse the ground any more for man's sake; for the imagination of man's heart is evil from his youth; neither will I again smite any more every thing living, as I have done.
Obviously, since God is a spirit, that rules it out!
Don't want to use a regular site, they ask for real info. So, either a free one, or let it be.
Well, sometimes we might purify it more than others..Wait a minute, according to AV, the "purified" authorized English version trumps the Hebrew.
He is a spirit, are you?! We also were made long ago, are we the same now, or have we evolved? Were we more in appearance something like Neanderthal man, or etc? My opinion is that the chief thing that were have that is like God, is free will.Aren't we made in his image? If we have no relation with apes then we must be made in God's physical image!
No. Not sure where you dug that weird thought fromSo if God is a spirit, that means we can be evolved from apes and still be in God's image!
How does what result..?? The way that we guage the change that either was or will be is by the bible, compared to how we see it now work. In the case of the past, we also have observers. The very early records of man, that clearly denote key differences.
There is no scientific reason to doubt either. How does your comment show that all things were the same since the ancients died?
He is a spirit, are you?! We also were made long ago, are we the same now, or have we evolved?
Were we more in appearance something like Neanderthal man, or etc? My opinion is that the chief thing that were have that is like God, is free will.
No. Not sure where you dug that weird thought from
God has a form but we cant see it.If we could we would die.Hes too powerful.Man cant see God and live.If we are in God's spiritual image then it doesn't matter where/how our physical image came from.
He has a spiritual image.Ezekiel 1:28.Daniel 7:9.just a couple of scriptures.When people argue against evolution, they use the phrase "we were made in his image". This implies that we were made in God's physical image. If God is a spirit then he has no physical image, therefore nullifying the "in his image" argument.
It matters.Either we were formed as the book of Genesis specifies or we came about by more naturalistic means.If the 2nd option is correct then the whole authenticity of the bible is questionable.And if God is just a spirit, then human evolution shouldn't matter because it is his spiritual image that is important.
Im sure you underrate yourself when you compare your looks to that of an ape.Well then God must be more than just a spirit. If we are made in God's spiritual image, then where did our physical image come from? Why is our physical image so like that of apes when it could have been anything?
doesn't pi=3 or claiming the earth is flat when it is not or claiming that earth is the center of the universe when it is not do just that?It matters.Either we were formed as the book of Genesis specifies or we came about by more naturalistic means.If the 2nd option is correct then the whole authenticity of the bible is questionable.
God has a form but we cant see it.If we could we would die.Hes too powerful.Man cant see God and live.
He has a spiritual image.Ezekiel 1:28.Daniel 7:9.just a couple of scriptures.
It matters.Either we were formed as the book of Genesis specifies or we came about by more naturalistic means.If the 2nd option is correct then the whole authenticity of the bible is questionable.
Im sure you underrate yourself when you compare your looks to that of an ape.
OKGod has a form but we cant see it.If we could we would die.Hes too powerful.Man cant see God and live.
OKHe has a spiritual image.Ezekiel 1:28.Daniel 7:9.just a couple of scriptures.
Wrong. The accuracy of your interpretation of scripture is questionable, not the authenticity of the book itself. Genesis is one of the earliest books and was clearly written as poetic allegories. These were stories based on older Egyptian/ Babylonians stories known at the time, intended to teach theological points to Bronze-Age goat-herders. They were never intended originally to teach these points to 21st century Americans who have a very different culture and a much more literal way of looking at things.It matters.Either we were formed as the book of Genesis specifies or we came about by more naturalistic means.If the 2nd option is correct then the whole authenticity of the bible is questionable.
But we are apes, biologically speaking. Of course we look like apes!Im sure you underrate yourself when you compare your looks to that of an ape.
Nothing is needed to supersede the tooth fairy, or the extrapolated dreamscapes that result from same state machinations of men's minds, in such insane scenarios as the big bang.I wasn't trying to prove anything by my comment - I just wanted to see how you would justify your statement. Bible aside, what are these "records of man, that clearly denote key differences" that supercede the Big Bang as an explanation, and how do they do so?
True.God has a form but we cant see it.If we could we would die.Hes too powerful.Man cant see God and live.
Yes, He can manifest that way.He has a spiritual image.Ezekiel 1:28.Daniel 7:9.just a couple of scriptures.
True. If God be true, then let every man be found a liar..It matters.Either we were formed as the book of Genesis specifies or we came about by more naturalistic means.If the 2nd option is correct then the whole authenticity of the bible is questionable.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?