4004 Bc

[Nathan Poe]

What you can do is debate right here and now in an honest way. I doubt that clipping select quotes from a free for all, atheist run street fight debate is acceptable here.

Actually, David, it's a perfectly reasonable way to learn about your character and whether or not you're capable/deserving of debate on the level you're asking for -- although most of us figured that much out long ago.

If you want to back up dating this is a good thread. If you want to be utterly demolished, in a split merge debate, there is another thread in the physical science forum I started that would be a good place for that. Otherwise, well, you know..

As I recall, David, you're the one who got utterly demolished when you failed to produce any evidence to disprove the pixies.

 

[corvus_corax]

Actually, David, it's a perfectly reasonable way to learn about your character and whether or not you're capable/deserving of debate on the level you're asking for -- although most of us figured that much out long ago.

Nah, just those of us who refuse to engage such a person anymore in debate (which appears to be very few, sad though it is)

As I recall, David, you're the one who got utterly demolished when you failed to produce any evidence to disprove the pixies.

And the diamond core earth and the "purpose" of women, and the "fact" that women are to blame for male homosexuality.

The fact that anyone (I mean ANYONE) still engages him in debate blows my mind. And, after all this time, I dont think ANYONE can even justify their forum correspondence with him as "I'm doing it for the lurkers".

Debating such a person is tantamount to bashing one's head into a brick wall. (i.e. all you get is a painful sensation...............even among his fellow christians on the christian-only boards)


ETA- GeneSplicer, why bother? Why not just put D E on Ignore? Is it really THAT important to you? Really??

 

[dad]

Thank you for posting yet another strawman claim. I have addressed your claims and your split/merge snuff fantasy.

Thank you for keeping true to form and backing away from your hollow unsubstantiated claims about me. If you had the proof, I’m sure you would post it.

Thank you for backing away from the fact that your claim that your accounts have never been suspended or that you have never been banned from a forum has been proven to be an erroneous one or a fabrication on your part.

Thank you for backing away from the fact that you use the label of anti-Christ to dismiss those you cannot debate and those you with to threaten with violence.

And thank you for illustrating yet again just how, in the face of the facts that have been presented as to how your split/merge snuff fantasy has been torn apart and shown to be based upon nothing but your violent fantasies, you simply drop a conversation and debate you cannot face or have just lost outright.



More like running away.



And that appears to be yet another lie. You have already lied when you stated that your accounts have never been banned. Do I need to contact the anti-Christ-filled admin to clarify the matter?



Only in your laughable attempt at spin. The fact is you appeared to have lied.



And that is yet another lie. We have already illustrated just how your recall skills are not to be trusted since you lied about never having an account suspended.



Another fabrication. Your established character on several forums indicate that you would not simply and quietly leave a forum without venting as to why first. You have taken similar actions on Physorg when you were unable to debate in a thread.



Liking it has nothing to do with your outright lies David. Again, your claims simply lack verisimilitude.



Again David, I am not the one with the split/merge snuff fantasy. You are. Your own posts illustrate that fact.



Sorry David, but again, your simplistic attempt with this dodge simply doesn’t wash. You made your split/merge nonsense part of the topic of this thread and it is fair game to be challenged and scrutinized as many have done here already.
You are just upset that I made public the full details of your non-Christian snuff fantasy.



That you are still intellectually dishonest, are desperately trying to change the topic from one that you yourself brought to the forum and are now cowering away from your previous claims of fact? That is painfully obvious by now David.

I’m shocked that you have no more appeals to the lurkers and no more thinly veiled threats.



You mean like all of the honest debates from three forums at least where you have ignored facts, threatened other with violence and then left in a juvenile huff?

I have been honest David and I have done exactly what I stated I was here to do. I have exposed your full non-Christian split/merge snuff fantasy for what it is illustrated by your own statements.

If you want to talk about honesty, then try backing up your claims you have made here about me. I have backed my claims up over and over and can keep doing so. You seem to be only able to post one hollow accusation after another.



And I doubt your strawman claims amount to an honest debate either. I have not posted selective quotes David. I have posted links to the full threads if not the forums themselves for people to read and make up their own mind about.

And are you really going to claim that all the forums that I have mentioned where you have been taken to task, warned and banned in some cases are run by atheists?

And speaking about “street fight debate”, how odd is it that I can cite where time after time you posted insults, personal comments of a very person nature and had to resort to juvenile name alteration in your replies?

So much for your appeal to honesty or posing as having the character to act in a rational manner.



And reposting the same arguments you have ignored on four forums at least would accomplish exactly what David? You have illustrated just how in these forums you ignore that which you cannot face or honestly debate. And on one forum when your dodges fail, you call people names and threaten them with violence.



To debate your split/merge non-Christian murdering magically mutable fantasy has been done David and, as it has been stated, you and your snuff fantasy have been shown lacking.

And again, how about you try to simply back up your claim you have made about me. If the facts are on your side, you should be able to point to a thread or a forum or even one comment that backs up your claims.

I have and can keep posting the threads, forums and your own comments that support my claims about you and your non-Christian snuff fantasy.



I know that you cannot back up any of your claim you have leveled at me while I have supported all of mine.

It still appears that you have no facts on your side David. So if you really want to illustrate just how erroneous my claims are, then cite a source or post a link that illustrates how I have lied about anything you claim I have.

If you can’t, well, then we will all know if we don’t already just how hollow and unsubstantiated your claims are.

Stop cowering and running away from your own claims you have made about me David and try backing them up.

If you can’t, then you are done whether you can see it and admit it or not.

Work on that.

Lurkers..what did I tell you?! No case presented, as always. Sorry, I have no time to waste if you can't muster an on topic case. Bye Josh.

 

[dad]

Nah, just those of us who refuse to engage such a person anymore in debate (which appears to be very few, sad though it is)
And the diamond core earth and the "purpose" of women, and the "fact" that women are to blame for male homosexuality.

The fact that anyone (I mean ANYONE) still engages him in debate blows my mind. And, after all this time, I dont think ANYONE can even justify their forum correspondence with him as "I'm doing it for the lurkers".

Debating such a person is tantamount to bashing one's head into a brick wall. (i.e. all you get is a painful sensation...............even among his fellow christians on the christian-only boards)


ETA- GeneSplicer, why bother? Why not just put D E on Ignore? Is it really THAT important to you? Really??

My condolences on bashing your head, as it were in debating me. I used to be a flood geologist, so I feel your pain. It is great, now, though, I bash fables, and it is pretty painless. Nice to have a powerful case. I understand why you have to flee. Really. No hard feelings.

 

[dad]

Actually, David, it's a perfectly reasonable way to learn about your character and whether or not you're capable/deserving of debate on the level you're asking for -- although most of us figured that much out long ago.



As I recall, David, you're the one who got utterly demolished when you failed to produce any evidence to disprove the pixies.

No problem, Poe. You think not hurting the little pixies you dream up is getting demolished. How interesting.

As for my 'character' if you are going to focus on that, or me, in any thread, I want no part of it. I have enough problems looking in a mirror. I am here for ideas, not getting personal, Henry.

 

[dad]

Time to go for the jugular Genesplicer! We are all waiting for this final moment!

Don't get excited. I have an ace up my sleeve. The personal innuendos, and gossip, and fabrications really amount to nothing. What is important is who has a solid case, and can win a debate. Hint: save your money..if you are a betting man. I kid you not.

 

[Nathan Poe]

No problem, Poe. You think not hurting the little pixies you dream up is getting demolished. How interesting.

You couldn't disprove them -- so you're refusal to think outside your pixieless box only shows how baseless your claims are. How interesting.

As for my 'character' if you are going to focus on that, or me, in any thread, I want no part of it.

I'm not surprised.

I have enough problems looking in a mirror.

No comment.

I am here for ideas, not getting personal, Henry.

Sad how you see the name "Nathan," and only read "Henry." Sadder still that you refuse to acknowledge who you are, Mr. Enjay.

 

[dad]

You couldn't disprove them -- so you're refusal to think outside your pixieless box only shows how baseless your claims are. How interesting.

No need to disprove pixies you invvent. Not sure how to break it to you gentler than that.

Sad how you see the name "Nathan," and only read "Henry." Sadder still that you refuse to acknowledge who you are, Mr. Enjay.

Sad you see the name 'dad' and call me David.. Is that the way to go, Henry?

 

[Nathan Poe]

No need to disprove pixies you invvent. Not sure how to break it to you gentler than that.

And yet, you've got no problems inventing "witnesses" to your split/merge nonsense.

Sad you see the name 'dad' and call me David.. Is that the way to go, Henry?

If you're not honest enough to admit you're David Enjay, then any and all questions about your character have already been answered.

 

[dad]

And yet, you've got no problems inventing "witnesses" to your split/merge nonsense.



If you're not honest enough to admit you're David Enjay, then any and all questions about your character have already been answered.

Nope. Check your sources. My pen name I added in the split merge thingie, the rest is shallow presumption. It is my opinion that posters should try to avoid baseless slander. Of all things I know and don't know, my own name is one I do know.

Moving on...

 

[uke2se]

Don't get excited. I have an ace up my sleeve. The personal innuendos, and gossip, and fabrications really amount to nothing. What is important is who has a solid case, and can win a debate. Hint: save your money..if you are a betting man. I kid you not.

You have no solid case, and despite your hilariously erroneous self-applied tag, you have been continuously defeated in every debate I've seen you participate in.

 

[Philothei]

Mod hat on

Please do not derail this thread. The issue is the OP not each other. Or this thead will be closed.


Mod hat off​

 

[dad]

You have no solid case, and despite your hilariously erroneous self-applied tag, you have been continuously defeated in every debate I've seen you participate in.

Just as you are defeating me here in this debate, I suppose What, I should skulk off and lick my wounds now, from your great presentation of fact and reason? Get a grip.

Better still. address the OP. Specifically, support the dating basis for the first people mentioned in 4004 BC.

 

[Nathan Poe]

Just as you are defeating me here in this debate, I suppose

Just as reality is defeating you.

What, I should skulk off and lick my wounds now, from your great presentation of fact and reason? Get a grip.

One who is not accustomed to fact or reason might not realize they've been wounded.

Better still. address the OP. Specifically, support the dating basis for the first people mentioned in 4004 BC.

Already done. Are you going to produce anything to refute it besides opinion?

 

[suzybeezy]

ADMIN HAT ON

Thread closed for review

ADMIN HAT OFF