You cannot even address the counter-arguments because they forbid your error. You and Keras are doing more to advance the Amil than we are. As jgr stated: "talk about denying the undeniable."
You do not even know what sin is. Amazing!
What is sin, in your opinion?
12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:
13 (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.
14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.
15 But not as the offence, so also is the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many.
16 And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgment was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification.
17 For if by one man's offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.)
18 Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.
19 For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.
20 Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound:
21 That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord.
Sin is not disobedience.
Impute:
ascribe (righteousness, guilt, etc.) to someone by virtue of a similar quality in another.
but sin is not imputed when there is no law.
Was the command to not eat a law?
If you claim Adam sinned because he ate against a command or a law, does not mean that he was a sinner or sinned prior to breaking the Law/command.
You deny that Adam physically died upon eating. You do not even impute the penalty, yet claim Adam was a sinner and sinned. It was not a sin until after the act. Adam did not sin nor did Eve sin when Eve ate. Eve could have continued eating her whole life, because she was not given the command. Nothing would have changed one iota. Sin is only imputed when a law exists. In Adam's case sin nor sinners did not exist, because sin did not exist until Adam ate one bite. That is when Adam disobeyed. That was when Adam sinned. That was when sin entered the world. It did not exist the second Adam ate, but did exist the instant after eating.
God did not let sin keep happening, because Adam was not allowed to keep eating over and over and constantly break the only command given. But it was too late. Adam had physically died, and was given a corruptible body of flesh and he lost the incorruptible body he had. Sin and a sin nature was then handed down through corruptible flesh. Even without laws, sin was around but not imputed. The point that God was constantly at odds with all the sons of God, not part of Adam's descendants, means that the sons of God had to experiment and test the bounds of God's endurance without any laws present. The only thing we are told is that they sought offspring with Adam’s fallen flesh and blood. Instead of leaving the rotten flesh alone, they felt they needed to add rotten flesh into their own DNA for some unknown reason.
Why is sin not disobedience in Adam's case, but is now in ours? Do you say we are still under the Law or under Grace? Because if you say under both, then why did Christ die on the Cross and why do you claim the NC eradicated sin, if there is still a Law to be under? We are not under the Law. We are still under sin but Grace abounds more than our sin. We have sin without a Law. Adam had no sin period, but one Law that would bring sin into the world and Adam's disobedience was not sin, because sin did not exist until that first Law was broken. Adam did not sin to disobey. Adam disobeyed to start sin as a reality. The Law did not make us sinners. The Law just gives us sinners something to disobey. That is why the Law imputed sin.
The Law given to Adam only imputed sin after the fact. That Law was pointless after Adam left the Garden. Adam had no way of disobeying God again. There was no law to break for Adam after that.
Sin in my opinion is the result of knowing good and evil. If we did not know good or evil we would not understand sin at all. Can we comprehend what it is like not knowing good and evil? NO! You deny that rebellion can exist without that knowledge. Yet Adam rebelled without that knowledge, and you deny even that point. Disobedience is rebellion. Death is the result of rebellion or disobedience. That is one fact that can be known. Sin on the other hand is only related to knowing good and evil. We know that God can remove both sin and the knowledge of good and evil. What that is like or how the mind process in that environment is not known.