ICONO'CLAST
Well-Known Member
Who have you met who claims to be a NON bible believing Christian?I don't claim to be in either camp. I just claim to be a Bible-believing Christian.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Who have you met who claims to be a NON bible believing Christian?I don't claim to be in either camp. I just claim to be a Bible-believing Christian.
Who have you met who claims to be a NON bible believing Christian?
You've shown nothing. I've shown the aorist tense, which it seems you're just not willing to accept.I’ve already shown the word for word translation.
Again, the aorist tense is the tense of COMPLETED ACTION. Words that end in "ed" indicate past action. I can hardly believe I'm having to explain to an adult.Nothing indicates that believing is past tense.
Please define what you mean by "necessary". Necessary for WHAT?You said abiding is important but not necessary.
I don't need anyone to explain the "truth about the Greek lexicon". I have both textbooks (lexicons) and the internet.If you really want to know the truth about the Greek lexicon I suggest you speak to some of the Orthodox brothers we have here and see what they have to say on the subject.
I wouldn't bet on that.I’m sure your aware the Orthodox Church is somewhat of an authority on Greek interpretation of scripture.
No. Just "blinded" by the truth of the Word.I’m also sure you will reject their interpretation because I believe you are too blinded by pride my friend.
This is exactly WHY I am totally unimpressed with the "Orthodox" brand. That's just nonsense. It's taught all over the Bible. You've seen the evidence, and you've chosen to reject the truth.I’m also certain that you are aware that no church ever taught eternal security until the mid 15th century.
Everyone who rejects eternal security is incorrect.Eternal security suggests that all of Christianity was incorrect for the first 1500+ years.
And they are among the rejectors of truth.None of the early church fathers taught eternal security.
Because you continue to refuse to note the context of that, which is the Tribulation, you cannot properly understand the sentence.As I’ve pointed out Jesus said many will turn away from him but those who are vicious and endure to the end will be saved.
I suggest you tell Jesus that.To think that someone can believe then later doubt and renounce their faith and still be saved is a very skewed interpretation of the scriptures.
That's true.Jesus is not just the Way to life He is a Way of life.
Yes, this is fellowship.When we abide in Him He abides in us.
This is where you go off the rails. When out of fellowship, the believer cannot bear fruit.If we don’t abide in Him He does not abide in us and there is no salvation without Him.
Well, your so-called "Orthodoxy" is quite unorthodox as it is in direct opposition to what Jesus said, and said quite plainly.This is what Jesus taught His 11 faithful apostles the night before He was crucified and it is what all of Christianity has taught for the first 1500 years.
You've shown nothing. I've shown the aorist tense, which it seems you're just not willing to accept.
Please define what you mean by "necessary". Necessary for WHAT?
Again, the aorist tense is the tense of COMPLETED ACTION. Words that end in "ed" indicate past action. I can hardly believe I'm having to explain to an adult.
Yes...false professors...1 in 2:19I’ve met a few who were believers who later became atheist.
This is exactly WHY I am totally unimpressed with the "Orthodox" brand. That's just nonsense. It's taught all over the Bible. You've seen the evidence, and you've chosen to reject the truth.
Yes...false professors...1 in 2:19
So what? One sentence with a present tense "believe" in it. Why do you keep ignoring the FACT that there are MANY aorist tense "believes" as well?I’ve shown nothing? I’ve shown the word for word translation.
Well, why don't you have a Greek textbook? Or bother the internet? The answer is clear and easy to obtain.You however have shown absolutely nothing concerning the aorist tense you’ve only claimed it to be the case giving absolutely no evidence to support that idea.
That's what I thought, but I needed clear confirmation.Necessary for salvation.
Are you not aware that the ONLY WAY to translate the aorist tense is by using the English ending on a word to designate the past tense?There is no “ed” in the word pisteuo or mē which is why I pointed it out sir.
You BET I choose to REJECT what the early church fathers taught, but FAILED to substantiate.You choose to not believe what has been taught and substantiated by the early church fathers.
I much prefer chapter and verse from the Bible. God's Word, NOT man's opinions.St Iranaeus Adversus Haeresus 180AD
Book 4 Chapter 27 section 2
Now, your assignment is to figure out what Jesus meant. Remember that He was using a metaphor here. He wasn't speaking literally.Consider John 15:1-10. Jesus is speaking only to His 11 faithful apostles when He says abide (remain) in Me. Anyone who does not abide will be cut off from the vine and cast away into the fire.
If we have a biblical understanding of salvation the issue is resolved.Consider John 15:1-10. Jesus is speaking only to His 11 faithful apostles when He says abide (remain) in Me. Anyone who does not abide will be cut off from the vine and cast away into the fire.
Orthodox shmorshodox.Lol please ask some of the Orthodox brothers and sisters what the Orthodox Church says on this matter.
You BET I choose to REJECT what the early church fathers taught, but FAILED to substantiate.
Why would anyone be so interested in what any of them thought? We have the Bible itself. That's what I read and study. I don't need those knuckleheads to help me.
Obviously, you must be unaware of these warnings from the Bible:
Acts 15:1 - Certain people came down from Judea to Antioch and were teaching the believers: “Unless you are circumcised, according to the custom taught by Moses, you cannot be saved.”
While circumcision was the issue in that day, today we have the false teaching that unless one has faith PLUS works, they cannot be saved, or unless one has faith PLUS baptism, they cannot be saved, and so on.
Acts 20:
29 I know that after I leave, savage wolves will come in among you and will not spare the flock.
30 Even from your own number men will arise and distort the truth in order to draw away disciples after them.
31 So be on your guard! Remember that for three years I never stopped warning each of you night and day with tears.
That's what I think about the early church fathers. They failed to comprehend what grace is.
I much prefer chapter and verse from the Bible. God's Word, NOT man's opinions.
If we have a biblical understanding of salvation the issue is resolved.
I am waiting for him to start teaching universalism.............It's what the early church 'fathers' taught.You BET I choose to REJECT what the early church fathers taught, but FAILED to substantiate.
Now, your assignment is to figure out what Jesus meant. Remember that He was using a metaphor here. He wasn't speaking literally.