- Nov 15, 2012
- 20,401
- 1,731
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Constitution
FreeGrace2 said: ↑
Then prove that it isn't, for pete's sake. Stop your whining and complaining and put your money where your mouth is.
I understand you opinion; John 10:28 isn't a deterministic statement. So what?
Your opinion doesn't count. You've proved nothing. Your opinions prove nothing.
I've given a color coded explanation of both the CAUSE and EFFECT of possessing eternal life. All you've done is ignore it.
And I'll tell you why you keep ignoring it. It cannot be refuted. By you or anyone else.
It is exactly what Jesus was saying.
Show me these "cause and effect statements" in verses around John 10:28.
Do any of these "cause and effect statements" refute or negate the actual cause and effect statements in John 10:28?
Why don't you EVER explain yourself?
And that IS eternal security.
Anyone with a high school level education can easily see that when they read John 10:27 and 28.
WANT to see in those verses. That's called eisegesis.
From Merriam-Webster Dictionary: Eisegesis definition is - the interpretation of a text (as of the Bible) by reading into it one's own ideas.
That's what you and Mr Clarke do.
The rest of what he wrote wasn't worth the time to refute. He shot himself in the head in the first sentence out of his mouth.
Then prove that it isn't, for pete's sake. Stop your whining and complaining and put your money where your mouth is.
I understand you opinion; John 10:28 isn't a deterministic statement. So what?
Your opinion doesn't count. You've proved nothing. Your opinions prove nothing.
I've given a color coded explanation of both the CAUSE and EFFECT of possessing eternal life. All you've done is ignore it.
And I'll tell you why you keep ignoring it. It cannot be refuted. By you or anyone else.
It is exactly what Jesus was saying.
So what?You take one verse and keep hammering on it, without paying any attention to the cause and effect statements in the verses around it.
Show me these "cause and effect statements" in verses around John 10:28.
Do any of these "cause and effect statements" refute or negate the actual cause and effect statements in John 10:28?
Why don't you EVER explain yourself?
Exactly!! That's my point. John 10:28 cannot refuted. And Jesus gave us the CAUSE of having eternal life, and the EFFECT of having eternal life.There is nothing to refute.
And that IS eternal security.
And I can easily PROVE that you have totally misunderstood the verse. So go ahead, allow me to PROVE how wrong you are.I can take one verse by itself and say it's good to kill babies.
I'm not interested in your opinion. Just show how John 10:28 isn't about the CAUSE and EFFECT of having eternal life.This is not the way the Word is read and understood, it's how cults are born.
He's as screwed up as any Arminian. The CAUSE of never perishing is NOT found in v.27 as he opines. It is found at the beginning of v.28. Being given eternal life is the CAUSE of never perishing.Adam Clarke Commentary on John 10:28.
They shall never perish - Why? Because they hear my voice, and follow me; therefore I know, I approve of and love them, and give them eternal life.
Anyone with a high school level education can easily see that when they read John 10:27 and 28.
Thank you for this EXCELLENT EXAMPLE OF EISEGESIS. Please show me the word "continue" in either v.27 or v.28. You can't, so you're only inserting words that youThey who continue to hear Christ's voice, and to follow him, shall never perish.
WANT to see in those verses. That's called eisegesis.
From Merriam-Webster Dictionary: Eisegesis definition is - the interpretation of a text (as of the Bible) by reading into it one's own ideas.
That's what you and Mr Clarke do.
The rest of what he wrote wasn't worth the time to refute. He shot himself in the head in the first sentence out of his mouth.
Upvote
0