In your post #35, you yourself confirmed by your response.
Here is the whole post:
"I said:
"Sure. Lots. Believers who quit will face God's discipline, which, according to Heb 12:11 is painful. They will be denied blessings during their lifetime, and loss of reward in eternity. Isa 1:18-20 was given to Israel, but the principle hasn't been rescinded."
Then you asked this:
So are you saying that only believers who quit will face God's discipline?
Didn't you read my statement above? You quoted it in your response.
Look at the first line."
Did you look at the first line, which answered your question. I NEVER said "only believers who quit will face God's discipline. I did say that believers who quit will face God's discipline.
Is this too complicated for you to follow, or what?
I would define believers differently than you, based on what Scripture shares.
I would agree that your definition must be different than what the Bible says about it.
The expected belief is a much greater concept than you give it credit for. For instance, Jesus speaks to churches in Rev 2 & 3. To each church, He says something and then closes out like this example in Rev 3:5: "He that overcomes, the same shall be clothed in white raiment; and I will not blot out his name from the Book of Life, but I will confess his name before My Father, and before His angels."
Nothing in Rev 2 or 3 that speaks of how to be saved. The messages are to believers IN churches. And the "overcomer" comments refer to eternal reward, not salvation, which you probably have never been taught.
So, (1) Jesus is speaking to a church and Jesus is saying only "he who overcomes...." What happens to those who don't overcome?
Easy answer. They don't get what He spoke of. No reward.
(2) If Jesus can (and will) blot names out of the Book of Life and you don't enter the Book of Life until you are born again, what does that mean to your theory?
First, Jesus NEVER EVER said anyone's name will be blotted out. It was a figure of speech, called a "litotes", which refutes your misunderstanding of what He said.
Here is a definition from a Yahoo search:
ironic understatement in which an affirmative is expressed by the negative of its contrary (e.g., you won't be sorry, meaning you'll be glad).
Here's one from Merriam-Webster:
Litotes definition is - understatement in which an affirmative is expressed by the negative of the contrary (as in 'not a bad singer' or 'not unhappy') ...
So don't take a litotes statement as something it is not.
So by "not blotting out" one's name, the opposite is true. The person who overcomes will be honored, the OPPOSITE of having their name blotted out.
You mock about mystically becoming non-sons.
Not mocking at all. If salvation can be lost, then becoming UN-saved would also demand being made an UN-son, UN-adopted, UN-justified, UN-regenerated. Etc.
Don't forget that those who become sons are mystically made sons.
Not mystical at all. What a weird claim to make. God works supernaturally, if you never noticed.
So, why, if someone no longer wants to be "an (adopted) son" (though I can't fathom someone who truly is a son ever doing such a thing), would God force them to remain such?
Oh, yeah, the old "free will" argument. Where are any verses that tell us that one can be made an UN-son, UN-justified, UN-regenerated then? Hm?
Do you really not understand what a promise means? When God promises something, it WILL come to pass. Which you seemingly don't believe.
Heb 6:18 - God did this so that we would be encouraged.
God cannot lie when he takes an oath or makes a promise. These two things can never be changed. Those of us who have taken refuge in him hold on to the confidence we have been given. GWT
When God promises or guarantees something, you can take it to the bank.
He wants willing worshippers.
Of course He does. And He disciplines His children who don't.
If He didn't want people to willfully worship Him, He could have prevented our free will.
He doesn't prevent anyone's free will. But again, He has promised an inheritance in heaven for those who have believed, per Eph 1:13,14, so deal with it.
He didn't want that. And, if He didn't care about someone willfully choosing Him, He could have said: "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, so that everyone would be saved." But, He didn't say that. So, why would that God who only wanted those who wanted Him, make someone stay who didn't want Him--simply because they gave some temporary assent at one point in their lives?
Your question reveals a total failure to grasp what it means when God makes a promise.
Review Eph 1:13,14, John 5:24, John 10:28.