12 Mississippi children in ICU, 10 on ventilators

[FredVB]

I see statistics for comorbidity of underlying conditions with COVID 19. But what addresses the comorbidity with vaccinations? Deaths following vaccinations, which really happen, are blamed on underlying conditions, what number or percentage of those with underlying conditions still survive after vaccinations for COVID? Without any number of that we can just know those with underlying conditions getting vaccinated for COVID will die following that. Even with a known percentage of those surviving, the higher risk to life, with vaccination, is really undesirable. Using any precautions otherwise against exposure to COVID continuously still is really preferable.

You do know the difference between having a heart attack at statistically normal rates, and having higher then statistical rates of heart attacks and other things. the FLU causes comorbities and things like misscariages and such. Something like covid that puts a strain on the body especially if the heart is beating harder to get for instance oxygen, that heart attacks might go up and other things. You have cancer or some other disease, your body is too busy fighting covid to be able to fully fight the other disease and so on.

This is LITERALLY what the placebo is for, to find out if the rates of occurrences are higher or lower in a population taking or having something.

If one with such vulnerability is taking care of their own self with avoiding what would compromise their health, effectively, which can be done in cases where they don't have a poor diet or exposure to what diabetes 2, cancers, heart attacks and strokes come from, with wearing a facemask whenever in presence of others, and avoiding being near others generally, such one would not be as likely to die very soon as they would be with a vaccination with which some others so vulnerable have died very soon afterward. That is just the way it is.

It makes sense that there's a lot more time and energy put into something which killed 3/4 of a million Americans (in this case, covid) rather than something which killed less than 10.

Heck, what would the error bars even look like trying to draw connections on a cause of death for single-digit per year mortality rates?

It seems to make more sense, yet is it really less than ten? How do you know? And even while much lower, it is very significant to those who do lose their life to a vaccination. You can't give any of the vulnerable real assurance that a vaccination would not kill them. What guarantee could they collect on from you being wrong with your stated assurance? Taking precautions otherwise makes much more sense. Period.