You are manipulating numbers to agree with your side. You just told me before that, of course the numbers of vaccinated people who are getting hospitalizes and dying are going up because the number of people getting the vaccine is going up.
Yet you would never say , "of course There is a greater number of people dying that aren't vaccinated because the pool of unvaccinated people is much larger than the pools of those that are."
It depends on quantitative comparisons. Let's look that it mathematically. Suppose the chance of dying unvaccinated is
p and the chance of dying vaccinated is
q. The null hypothesis would say that
p=
q. That is, the probability of dying is the same whether you get the vaccine or not. The positive hypothesis is that
q<<
p, that is taking the vaccine vastly lowers your probability of dying. For example, if one claims the Pfizer vaccine is 95% effective, that means 95% of the times where someone would have gotten infected and died, he will not get infected or die. That can be expressed as
q=
p×0.05.
Now suppose that
r is the fraction of people who are still unvaccinated and
s is the fraction of people who are vaccinated. Then
r+
s=1.
Now let's bring in the statistic you mentioned - the fraction of deaths that are of the vaccinated. Let's call that
v and the fraction of deaths that are unvaccinated we will call
u. Therefore
u+
v=1. Suppose
d is the probability of dying of covid, regardless of whether you are vaccinated or not. So what can we do with these values? In terms of what we have already defined, we have:
p = (
u×d)/
r (definition of conditional probability)
q = (
v×d)/
s (definition of conditional probability)
q/
p is some number that expresses whether or not this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated. If that number is 1 or close to it, it is not. If that number is much smaller than 1 (like 0.05), it is. We can calculate
q/
p from the values of
u,
v,
r, and
s, which are all available to you. (The value of
d cancels out so you don't need to know it to do the calculation. So just calculate (
v/
s)/(
u/
r) and see what you get. From the article quoted by The Barbarian, we see that for Wisconsin,
r=0.48
s=0.52
u=0.95
v=0.05
I leave the calculation as an exercise for the reader. (It takes 15 seconds with a calculator.)
[edited: to clarify the mathematics]