100%, absolute, irrefutable proof of God's existence

[Shrewd Manager]

I trust what He says because He's trustworthy. But I don't know what He means exactly when He says He established the earth upon it's foundations, so that it will not totter forever and ever. Totter doesn't sound very good (as in unstable). I understand the sentiments behind His words as don't think you know a lot. As for Joshua and the sun standing still, I figure if God can make a universe, it's not logical to believe He can't stop the sun or make time stand still.

I invite you to compare the various translations of Psalm 104:5 He set the earth on its foundations, never to be moved.. I suggest the plain sense is abundantly clear.

We might consider the warning to Job, when we next put our faith in so-called modern cosmology.

If God can stop the sun, it means the sun was in motion. This is contrary to the heliocentric theory.

 

[timewerx]

Hi all. This video is about the plank satellite and how it measured the CMB (cosmic microwave background). The data demonstrates that the universe rotates on an axis, with our solar system being the center of that axis.

Keep in mind, a rotating body would be rotating in the same direction regardless of location.

Nothing in there proves that God Exists.

God showed me what the Universe looks like outside and not even that gives any clue. Only begs more questions than answers.

The proof lies elsewhere. The question people should be asking is NOT whether the Universe is created but if whether the Universe is at all *real*.

The closest I could ever come to describe the Universe in the fewest words possible is "Pandora's Box".

 

[solid_core]

Why can't the universe itself have always existed?

Because its changing and expanding. And this expansion can be traced to one small point of its beginning.

 

[Jonathan Walkerin]

Hi all. This video is about the plank satellite and how it measured the CMB (cosmic microwave background). The data demonstrates that the universe rotates on an axis, with our solar system being the center of that axis.

While I am sure that a video with one comment and 26 views in Youtube will reveal to us the secrets of the universe that experts have missed I will wait for a bit more authorative narrative on subject.

 

[Qwertyui0p]

My problem with that is we postulate a God that can't be physically sensed or measured whose very existence cannot be proven but has always existed and yet we say that God created everything physical. And then we say that our physical universe which can be sensed and measured owes its existence to this hypothetical God. Why can't the universe itself have always existed?

 

[Qwertyui0p]

Because its changing and expanding. And this expansion can be traced to one small point of its beginning.

Secular scientists blast the big bang - creation.com

 

[solid_core]

Secular scientists blast the big bang - creation.com

The big bang theory is still the standard cosmological theory. Atheist scientists can blast it in the same way young earth scientists are "blasting" long ages and evolution, but the standard science still goes its way.

 

[JackRT]

The big bang theory is still the standard cosmological theory. Atheist scientists can blast it in the same way young earth scientists are "blasting" long ages and evolution, but the standard science still goes its way.

Both the Big Bang Theory and the Theory of Evolution are very well established major theories, with enormous levels of verification and evidence. The ToE is stronger, probably, than the BBT, but it's sort of like saying 'steel is fairly strong but titanium alloy is stronger' - either one will serve for tableware with no danger of failure due to stress. At this point there are no known major issues with either theory. Details to be filled in? Yes. Serious difficulties? No.

 

[John Helpher]

While I am sure that a video with one comment and 26 views in Youtube will reveal to us the secrets of the universe that experts have missed I will wait for a bit more authorative narrative on subject.

But, what did you think about the substance of the video?

 

[John Helpher]

Both the Big Bang Theory and the Theory of Evolution are very well established major theories

They are well promoted theories.

At this point there are no known major issues with either theory.

A lot of people don't understand what the theory of evolution itself states. It is a theory to explain how life came to be what it is now without any intelligence, guidance, purpose or intent. That's it.

If you want to say that God used trillions of tiny changes over billions of years, that is not evolution; that is intelligent design. It's an important distinction.

 

[chilehed]

The data demonstrates that the universe rotates on an axis, with our solar system being the center of that axis.

Umm.... no. That's a conclusion that the creator of that video arrived at. The actual data doesn't demonstrate that at all, nor does it in any way demand that conclusion.

 

[JackRT]

In the over 150 years of intense research since the ToE was proposed no intelligence, guidance, purpose or intent has been detected.

It is a theory to explain how life came to be what it is now without any intelligence, guidance, purpose or intent.

If you want to say that God used trillions of tiny changes over billions of years, that is not evolution; that is intelligent design.

Any successful life form will appear designed simply because it is successful.

 

[John Helpher]

Umm.... no. That's a conclusion that the creator of that video arrived at. The actual data doesn't demonstrate that at all, nor does it in any way demand that conclusion.

Have you seen the data?

 

[John Helpher]

In the over 150 years of intense research since the ToE was proposed no intelligence, guidance, purpose or intent has been detected.

So you're saying there's code without a coder?

 

[rockytopva]

Faith is not the opposite of doubt, faith is the opposite of certainty.

Light is the opposite of darkness
Faith and certainty both have elements of light
Fear, doubt, unbelief, and uncertainty have elements of darkness
Uncertainty would be a better choice of an opposite of faith

 

[Al Touthentop]

Hi all. This video is about the plank satellite and how it measured the CMB (cosmic microwave background). The data demonstrates that the universe rotates on an axis, with our solar system being the center of that axis. I'd like to hear what others think. Have you heard of this before? To me it is encouraging information because it's proof that the earth is not just some random, purposeless speck in the vastness of a bleak universe.

It's interesting. But don't expect there to be anything that is "irrefutable" or convincing to people. Even among those who believe in God, there are those who do not accept all that he says. God didn't create a system containing irrefutable evidence of his existence. Only those who accept him also accept the evidence of him.

The universe is in and of itself evidence of God to those who accept him.

 

[Al Touthentop]

Why can't the universe itself have always existed?

Because it has an age that can be detected, accurately or not.

 

[JackRT]

Because it has an age that can be detected, accurately or not.

Yes, the present iteration of our universe appears to be about 13.6 billion years old.

 

[Al Touthentop]

Yes, the present iteration of our universe appears to be about 13.6 billion years old.

There you go.

 

[JackRT]

The closest I could ever come to describe the Universe in the fewest words possible is "Pandora's Box".

Einstein once said "Not only is the universe difficult to understand, it may be more difficult than we can understand."