1.6-billion-year-old fossils push back origin of multicellular life by tens of millions of years

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

He did it with Adam. Why can't Jesus do it with the earth?

Peace and Blessings.

Because Adam is an allegorical tale, not literal history. Yet people who say that God flooded the world 4000 years ago then took away all the evidence and has the world look like it's 14.5 billion years old treat that as literal history. The latter is deception.

 

[dlamberth]

He did it with Adam. Why can't Jesus do it with the earth?

Peace and Blessings.

Because the nature of God is honest and straight up and is incapable of deceiving.

 

[TPop]

It's soft in the fact that it's not bone or rock. It's not soft-soft tissue. It's just the remains of soft tissue.

The rest of your post is rambling.

Proteins, flexible structures. Soft tissue decomposition rates vary enormously they say.

Rambling? Like that of evolutionists and some God-hating scientists. Yep. I mirrored them well.

Peace and Blessings.

 

[TPop]

Because the nature of God is honest and straight up and is incapable of deceiving.

Of course. However, that is not an argument. I have never argued God is deceiving. You are building a strawman. To get me to argue against God. Not thanks.

Peace and Blessings

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Proteins, flexible structures. Soft tissue decomposition rates vary enormously they say.

Rambling? Like that of evolutionists and some God-hating scientists. Yep. I mirrored them well.

Peace and Blessings.

Hard to take peace and blessing from someone who describes scientists as 'God-hating'.

 

[TPop]

Because Adam is an allegorical tale, not literal history. Yet people who say that God flooded the world 4000 years ago then took away all the evidence and has the world look like it's 14.5 billion years old treat that as literal history. The latter is deception.

Allegorical tale. What does that mean to you with regard to Adam and Eve?
Adam and Eve are a folk tale or fable? Are you indicating that God did not make Adam and Eve?

Peace and Blessings

 

[TPop]

Hard to take peace and blessing from someone who describes scientists as 'God-hating'.

I said "some God-hating scientists."
Please don't obfuscate my statements or worse, in an attempt to win something. There is nothing to win here.

Peace and Blessings.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Allegorical tale. What does that mean to you with regard to Adam and Eve?
Adam and Eve are a folk tale or fable? Are you indicating that God did not make Adam and Eve?

Peace and Blessings

I fail to see how what I said is confusing to you.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

I said "some God-hating scientists."
Please don't obfuscate my statements or worse, in an attempt to win something. There is nothing to win here.

Peace and Blessings.

So why are you arguing then?

 

[TPop]

So why are you arguing then?

I ask for clarification. You blame it on me. You can not simply elaborate.
You make accusations.
You make rude comments.
You place blame.
You make a lot of 'you' statements against me.

I am simply asking questions for clarification and making no value statements about you, your beliefs, your communication methods, or other. If I have, feel free to point it out and I will happily apologize. I try to be as mature as I can, but I slip and fall all the time.

But I have no interest in communicating with you as you present yourself thus far.

Peace and Blessings

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

I ask for clarification. You blame it on me. You can not simply elaborate.
You make accusations.
You make rude comments.
You place blame.
You make a lot of 'you' statements against me.

I am simply asking questions for clarification and making no value statements about you, your beliefs, your communication methods, or other. If I have, feel free to point it out and I will happily apologize. I try to be as mature as I can, but I slip and fall all the time.

But I have no interest in communicating with you as you present yourself thus far.

Peace and Blessings

Now I very much see you as making accusations and being rude to me.

So how about we stop this since this is just massively derailing the thread from the OP topic. Agreed?

 

[Tropical Wilds]

Fortunately evolutionists provide us with a map of the K-T Boundary and its not world-wide. At least not if you follow the map they provide and stick to the theory. If one feels they need to deviate from the theory then why not abandon the theory altogether?
Less then 5 minutes of google research will show you all the volcanoes in the K-T Boundary. This 5 minute research will also show you that volcanoes give off iridium emissions. So the iridium in the Yucatan region is due to volcanic activity.

Here's where this iridium thing gets real good. A simple 15 minute research on google will reveal to you that iridium concentrations in countries far away from the K-T Boundary have higher concentrations of iridium then Mexico! What does this mean? Well, if the asteroid did smash into the Yucatan like evolutionists claim then there is no dount that the region would have the highest concentrations of iridium in the entire world by far. But this is not the case at all. Other countries have higher iridium levels. And guess where all these iridium rich areas of the world are all located in? They are all located in a volcanic zone!!! <----and that's a triple exclam.

So you see there is no defense for the asteroid death. The fossils are found in sedimentary rock which is formed by water and not fire. Firestorms do not leave behind fossil records in sedimentary rock! There are dinosaur graveyards located inside the K-T Boundary. This should not be since the temperature of impact is said to be hotter then the sun. No way such an impact will leave fossils in that zone (or anywhere else on earth for all that).

Anyway, that was a quick lesson in real geology at no cost to you

And even at no cost, somehow you over charged… A lot of this looks like cobbled together sentiments from various sources without strung together without any real comprehension of what it means.

 

[Ragdoll]

Do you have resources of those 80 whale fossils? Where found maybe? Geology of area, pictures, studies and such.

I gave resources that debunked statements made by you with location, present and past geology, timing of beaching, cause of beaching and more. I'm hoping for the same from you.

If reading articles written by evolutionists is not good enough then perhaps you should be questioning them and not me. I no longer carry on long debates or take the time to source every word I write. Why? Because it doesn't change anything anymore then not sourcing my every word. In the end people will either do their own research and fact checking or they won't. I'm not here to teach people how to do research or to argue with anyone. You have debunked nothing. You can't debunk nothing I said because what I said about 80 whales in the Andes was what I read from some of your more reliable sources. Fact is, those whales were discovered in sedimentary rock and washed up whales on a beach will not become fossils. They will rot in the sun while scanvengers finish off the remains. And yes, bones and all are devoured by scanvengers.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

If reading articles written by evolutionists is not good enough then perhaps you should be questioning them and not me. I no longer carry on long debates or take the time to source every word I write. Why? Because it doesn't change anything anymore then not sourcing my every word. In the end people will either do their own research and fact checking or they won't. I'm not here to teach people how to do research or to argue with anyone. You have debunked nothing. You can't debunk nothing I said because what I said about 80 whales in the Andes was what I read from some of your more reliable sources. Fact is, those whales were discovered in sedimentary rock and washed up whales on a beach will not become fossils. They will rot in the sun while scanvengers finish off the remains. And yes, bones and all are devoured by scanvengers.

You mean like your statements that the KT-boundary were locations and not a geological layer? Honestly, everything you've written reads like you've found an article, skimmed through it and tried to repeat it without knowing what it is you're talking about.

 

[Ragdoll]

You mean like your statements that the KT-boundary were locations and not a geological layer? Honestly, everything you've written reads like you've found an article, skimmed through it and tried to repeat it without knowing what it is you're talking about.

Well if I may retract a little from my former statements. I was tired and past my bedtime. I meant to say the impact zone. The iridium layer is from volcanoes. There was never a global firestorm caused by an asteroid. Nothing would survive an asteroud larger and heavier then Mt.Everest smashing into the earth at 40,000mph. The kinetic energy such an impact would release is enough to destroy the world. The intense heat of the global firestorm would kill all life on earth and evaporate the world's oceans.
The original video of this asteroid simulation has been recently taken down from youtube so I had to find it from another source. But the original one by Discovery that included the Pink Floyd turn also said that this has happened six times in earth's past. I don't believe it ever happened once. And while this astroid in the video is larger then the alleged Chicxulub asteroid, the Chicxulub asteroid was still larger and heavier then Mt.Everest to do the same. Any asteoid large enough will kill all life on earth. But we are still here and the fossil record is found in sedimentary rock which wouldn't exist if an asteroid larger and heavier then Mt.Everest hit the earth.

 

[Ragdoll]

A description of the Chicxulub asteroid is laughable. I find it very hard to believe that anybody would believe that actually happened. I mean, our ecosystem is a fragile thing. And to believe only rodents suvived this event leads us to also believe that elephants, hippos, lions, bears, buffalo, deer, humans, and everything else all evolved from little rodents is abusrd to the highest degree.

 

[Larniavc]

The iridium layer is from volcanoes.

Still waiting for evidence that iridium anomalies match faults and not impacts.

 

[Larniavc]

The kinetic energy such an impact would release is enough to destroy the world.

Not so.

The impactor's velocity was estimated at 20 kilometers per second (12 mi/s).[29] The kinetic energy of the impact was estimated at 72 teratonnes of TNT (300 ZJ).[30] The impact generated winds in excess of 1,000 kilometers per hour (620 mph) near the blast's center,[31] and produced a transient cavity 100 kilometers (62 mi) wide and 30 kilometers (19 mi) deep that later collapsed. This formed a crater mainly under the sea and covered by 600 meters (2,000 ft) of sediment by the 21st century.[32] The impact, expansion of water after filling the crater, and related seismic activity spawned megatsunamis over 100 meters (330 ft) tall, with one simulation suggesting the immediate waves from the impact may have reached up to 1.5 kilometers (0.93 mi) high.[33][34] The waves scoured the sea floor, leaving ripples underneath what is now Louisiana with average wavelengths of 600 meters (2,000 ft) and average wave heights of 16 meters (52 ft), the largest ripples documented.[35][36]Material shifted by subsequent earthquakes and the waves reached to what are now Texas and Florida, and may have disturbed sediments as far as 6,000 kilometers (3,700 mi) from the impact site.[37][33][38]The impact triggered a seismic event with an estimated magnitude of 9–11 Mw .[39]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicxulub_crater#:~:text=The%20impactor's%20velocity%20was%20estimated,of%20TNT%20(300%20ZJ).

But do show us your maths for the Chicxulub meteorite having enough energy to destroy the world.

 

[Ragdoll]

Still waiting for evidence that iridium anomalies match faults and not impacts.

So it doesn't matter to you to know that the highest concentrations of iridium in the world are all located in volcanic areas? Where is you conscience at? Do you not see that the iridium layer was laid down by volcanic activity? But oh, you got to take one for the team and forcefully assume an asteroid in the Yucatan that never ever happened.

By the way, this is not a real picture from space. Its a computer image that fooled evos to believe its real. There is no crator in the Yucatan. But the Yucatan is on an ancient underwater volcano which is now dormant.

And do not forget that this Chicxulub extinction is still a theory and a theory is almost never true. I do think the reality that the Yucatan is a volcanic region speaks for itself. That is the cause of iridium.

 

[Ragdoll]

Not so.

The impactor's velocity was estimated at 20 kilometers per second (12 mi/s).[29] The kinetic energy of the impact was estimated at 72 teratonnes of TNT (300 ZJ).[30] The impact generated winds in excess of 1,000 kilometers per hour (620 mph) near the blast's center,[31] and produced a transient cavity 100 kilometers (62 mi) wide and 30 kilometers (19 mi) deep that later collapsed. This formed a crater mainly under the sea and covered by 600 meters (2,000 ft) of sediment by the 21st century.[32] The impact, expansion of water after filling the crater, and related seismic activity spawned megatsunamis over 100 meters (330 ft) tall, with one simulation suggesting the immediate waves from the impact may have reached up to 1.5 kilometers (0.93 mi) high.[33][34] The waves scoured the sea floor, leaving ripples underneath what is now Louisiana with average wavelengths of 600 meters (2,000 ft) and average wave heights of 16 meters (52 ft), the largest ripples documented.[35][36]Material shifted by subsequent earthquakes and the waves reached to what are now Texas and Florida, and may have disturbed sediments as far as 6,000 kilometers (3,700 mi) from the impact site.[37][33][38]The impact triggered a seismic event with an estimated magnitude of 9–11 Mw .[39]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicxulub_crater#:~:text=The%20impactor's%20velocity%20was%20estimated,of%20TNT%20(300%20ZJ).

But do show us your maths for the Chicxulub meteorite having enough energy to destroy the world.

Wikipedia lol! I don't accept that as an academic source. You do realize that I got my information from evolutionists, right? So if you contradict that you contradict evolution. But then there is the reality check that most evolutionists still hold to the global firestorm version of the tale which would have wiped out all life on earth and evaporated all water in the oceans and in the atmosphere. Then there is the reality that most evolutionists say that the survivors were small rodents and birds. From them evolved elephants, rhinos, lions, tigers, humans and everything else.