‘Our children, our rights’: Scores of parents hit rally opposing MoCo schools’ LGBTQ policies

[HARK!]

Why respond to a question posed to you with a question?

The preamble explains my question.

Do you think you're Jesus?

I follow his example; so I might resemble him. The answer is no; but I'm flattered by the question.

 

[2PhiloVoid]

The preamble explains my question.


I follow his example; so I might resemble him. The answer is no; but I'm flattered by the question.

It's good to see you have a sense of humor.

 

[Sabri]

I hadn't implied that you would be; and I haven't read your posts for the last 15 years. Why ask why?

 

[Sabri]

It's good to see you have a sense of humor.

Living in this world we all do-

 

[Hans Blaster]

Better late than never ...

One should be mature enough to recognize that Paul does not speak for them if that happens to be the case.

 

[Larniavc]

This teddy bear had a child with it.

It’s a bag for adults. Do you even read what you posts?

So it’s a bag for adults with not gay context. Smh

 

[Larniavc]

You asked about pictures of teddy bears with bondage. The other pictures can not be posted. I found one picture.

No I did not. That was the evidence you chose in response to my question. There is a pattern here. You keep either misquoting me or yourself. Please stop doing that.

 

[Larniavc]

Word salad.

I it isn’t. Word salad is when the contents of the sentences are un-parsable.

 

[Sabri]

One should be mature enough to recognize that Paul does not speak for them if that happens to be the case.

we are all mature here.

 

[Sabri]

It’s a bag for adults. Do you even read what you posts?

So it’s a bag for adults with not gay context. Smh

Stop it. I have showed you pics of teddy bears tied with leather straps and all other concoctions. Stop pretending you don’t see it. You are better than that.

 

[Sabri]

No I did not. That was the evidence you chose in response to my question. There is a pattern here. You keep either misquoting me or yourself. Please stop doing that.

I think you are the one with misquotes or forgetting. You asked for proof from another person. . A link to what was being said. The post was discussing how the teddy bears were depicted in bdsm and the pride fest parade. I sent you a link of the pride fest parade and the bear. The one i could post. Stop making this about me. The question wasn’t aimed at me i answered it for a friend. Now your getting all up in arms at me. Why? Cause i tried to help?

 

[Sabri]

I it isn’t. Word salad is when the contents of the sentences are un-parsable.

I know what it is. Medical terminology. What are your doing?

 

[2PhiloVoid]

One should be mature enough to recognize that Paul does not speak for them if that happens to be the case.

And folks in America should be sober and sane enough to deal even-handedly (politically) with those who do think that Paul speaks for them; or vice-versa-----when minority LGBTQ+ groups speak in public spaces.

In saying this, for some reason the song "Stuck in the Middle With You" by Steelers Wheel comes to mind.........................................

 

[Sabri]

I know what it is. Medical terminology. What are your doing?

I it isn’t. Word salad is when the contents of the sentences are un-parsable.

My last response had a typo.

 

[Belk]

Why don't you show me the data that supports that 5 year olds had any concept of these bizarre fetishes, before someone planted those thoughts in their heads?

That is your claim, you support it.

 

[Belk]

I thought you said same sex attraction. And some 5 year olds don’t. Again, do you have kids? Why not answer the question. My 5 year was a late bloomer She didn’t know all the ends and out. She’s not every 5 year old. But i don’t think you are assessing from a parents virw

How many times do I need to answer this question for you? Again, it is not relevant.

 

[Belk]

A part of what? Someone was quick to label me as bi-sexual on this platform. Then defined bi-sexual.

Yes, that was silly of them. I mean you had only claimed you could choose to find women sexually attractive.
/s

But when we say define woman. Oh no! Crying like a baby - calling names - now whose silly.

It is a silly gotcha question from Ketanji Brown Jackson's appointment. No one one is incapable of defining woman and it is irrelevant.

Victim stance.

I'm curious. What is the qualitative difference between the people one this board arguing that they should be able to opt out and LGBTQ people arguing for what they believe to be their rights? One you label as a "victim stance" and the other not so what is the criteria you are using?

It figures you say that- that’s the epitome of LGBTQ community- call themselves -queer but when we say other names they cry out.

Kind of like African Americans, American Indians, and other marginalized groups. How can you claim to love them when you don't seem to be able to understand the basics about respecting them?

 

[Belk]

You are funny!!

On occasion, but I try to avoid mirrors.

 

[Belk]

Let me get data for you- since my parenting and lived experience is not enough. Your Child's Development - 3 to 5 years

Thank you. Which part of this link do you feel is pertaining to the question?

 

[Hans Blaster]

And folks in America should be sober and sane enough to deal even-handedly (politically) with those who do think that Paul speaks for them; or vice-versa-----when minority LGBTQ+ groups speak in public spaces.

In saying this, for some reason the song "Stuck in the Middle With You" by Steelers Wheel comes to mind.........................................

To be clear, I was speaking of Paul's claim to know what everyone "knows" about "god" and not his morbid punishment fantasies. (That old "look at the trees" argument.) He is quite wrong about everyone knowing about god from looking at what exists in nature. Even believers don't all have such impressions.