- Sep 4, 2005
- 29,379
- 17,600
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Others
If Christians can't exercise the degree of social discipline in this country that they desire to, what makes you think that Muslims will be able to?
I would argue that Christians could exercise a much higher degree of religiosity and government entanglements if they really wanted to.
That's the thing, most don't want to.
The percentage of Christians that would want some sort of Christian theocracy is lower than the percentage of their Muslim counterparts who would want that.
The one stat I highlighted a few pages back.
Even among the 45% who say "The US should be a Christian Nation", only a quarter of that subset want any measure of codified state religion.
Similarly, among those who say in the new survey that the U.S. should be a Christian nation, only about a quarter (24%) said in the prior survey that the federal government should advocate Christian religious values. About twice as many (52%) said the government should “advocate for moral values that are shared by people of many faiths.”
Which lines up with the global outcomes we see. Only 31 of the ~120 (about a quarter) Christian-majority countries have any level of religion codified via law.
Or, in short, your premise is a tad flawed.
The lack of "Christian version of Sharia" in this country isn't due to legal guardrails stopping them from implementing their desired level of religiosity, it's that 75% of them don't actually desire it.
Your premise seemed to operate on the assumption that the majority of Christians are chomping at the bit to have a theocracy, and that our laws were the only thing stopping them, so "If it's stopping the Christians from doing that, its sufficient to stop Muslims from doing that should they ever become a majority"
Upvote
0