- Mar 27, 2007
- 36,368
- 4,812
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
I’m not a Calvinist. Assuming is not a good thing is it? I replied to your post because you made it like you where hitting some philosophical view but in further inspection is just about someone else’s thought and opinion not yours.Then, for the third time - my position is the same as Barth's.
Perhaps to advance our discussion I should elaborate his position.
God’s grace is absolute and victorious. In Barth’s theology, Christ’s atoning work is decisive for all humanity. Through Christ’s incarnation, death, and resurrection, the whole of creation is reconciled to God.
Hell remains possible but not necessary. Barth acknowledged the reality of divine judgment and human freedom to resist God, but he refused to affirm that anyone must be damned. Instead, he argued that we cannot know that anyone is lost, only that God has acted to save all.
Therefore, Christians may hope - though not assert - that God’s mercy will finally triumph and that hell will, in the end, be empty.
Thus we cannot preach universal salvation as doctrine, but we must not deny the possibility that God’s grace will save all.
Now that I have elaborated my position perhaps you will elaborate Calvin's reading of, say, Luke 7:30? This thread is after all about Calvinism.
Upvote
0