• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

ABC pulls Jimmy Kimmel Live after comments on Charlie Kirk

RocksInMyHead

God is innocent; Noah built on a floodplain!
May 12, 2011
9,421
10,193
PA
✟439,552.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
While the indefinite suspension was announced after Brendan Carr's threat, it happened so quickly afterwards I don't think ABC's announcement was a reaction to it. And Carr's statements were given on a podcast, not as part of an actual public announcement that would have gotten ABC's attention more quickly. And even if they were worried about his comments, there wasn't an immediacy to them that required them to take action mere hours afterwards.

Much more plausibly, the reason was the affiliates saying they wouldn't air Kimmel's show. That requires a more immediate response to deal with than Carr's statements, and (as far as I can tell) ABC would have fewer legal avenues to fight the issue with. I also strongly suspect that they were experiencing problems with advertisers pulling out of the show due to the controversy, again an issue they would have to deal with far more immediately than anything from the FCC. I feel like at most Carr's statements just accelerated what ABC was already considering or even already planned to do.
There was reporting on the interview pretty much immediately, and the affiliates didn't announce that they were dropping the Tonight Show until after it aired. Note that Carr didn't just threaten ABC - he also threatened the affiliates:
And frankly, I
16:45
think that it's it's it's really sort of
16:46
past time that a lot of these licensed
16:48
broadcasters themselves push back on
16:52
Comcast and Disney and say, "Listen, we
16:53
are going to preempt. We are not going
16:54
to run Kimmel anymore until you
16:58
straighten this out because we we
17:00
licensed broadcaster are running the
17:02
possibility of fines or license
17:04
revocations from the FCC if we continue
17:06
to run content that ends up being a
17:08
pattern of news distortion."
Now, maybe they communicated this to ABC beforehand - but also maybe the FCC communicated these threats to Sinclair and Nextar before the interview as well. However, even if it was a totally independent decision, this statement from the FCC still has a chilling effect on speech, because now everyone else is on notice. No matter how you look at it, what Carr said was, at minimum, extremely irresponsible, and aimed at stifling first amendment rights.
 
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
42,315
22,902
US
✟1,749,347.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
There's a little difference in approach, but substantially no difference.
The first important difference is that one is backed by legislation and one is not.

The second important difference is that one is based very specifically on Marxist Critical Theory and one is not, which absolutely changes their intended outcomes.
 
Upvote 0

Servus

<><
Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
28,878
15,586
Washington
✟1,003,443.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I'll trade you Stephen King for one of your celebrities of equivalent stature. Maybe JK Rowling or Kid Rock. We can bum a rocket off of Elmo and launch them both into the sun.
Who did they trash right after that person was politically assassinated?
 
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
42,315
22,902
US
✟1,749,347.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I'm aware of the full context of what he originally said. I've read the whole conversation. The video clip was him trying to double down on that. Effectively saying that an airline would employ a less qualified person, a less able pilot purely on the basis of their colour.

That is abject nonsense and we all know that.

What DEI does in this case is to give more people the opportunity to qualify. It increases the number of people who try to become pilots. And basic common sense will tell you that that will raise standards. Any given airline is going to take the best of any given group.
That's what Affirmative Action would do. Under Affirmative Action the black pilot would actually have to qualify at least to the standards of white pilots...if not a bit more, because "White Privilege" is actually a thing, and particularly was when that black male pilot started his journey.

DEI would do more and differently for a more specific outcome. DEI would require standards to be "adjusted" to make sure of a positive outcome. But DEI hasn't actually done much for blacks in general and not for black men in particular, so the odds that DEI gained his position are zero to none.

Statistics show that black people in general and black men in particular have been less benefited by DEI policies than any other group...less even than white men.
 
Upvote 0

Chesterton

Whats So Funny bout Peace Love and Understanding
Site Supporter
May 24, 2008
26,720
21,656
Flatland
✟1,109,520.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
The first important difference is that one is backed by legislation and one is not.
Agreed, but being backed by legislation doesn't necessarily mean it's morally right, or effective.
The second important difference is that one is based very specifically on Marxist Critical Theory and one is not, which absolutely changes their intended outcomes.
Agreed.
 
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
42,315
22,902
US
✟1,749,347.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Agreed, but being backed by legislation doesn't necessarily mean it's morally right, or effective.
It does mean, however, that one was approved by the officials elected by the people and one was not.

I was around and remember specifically why Affirmative Action was necessary. You apparently do not.

Then you must understand the difference and are merely being disingenuous.
 
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
23,604
16,172
72
Bondi
✟382,256.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
That's what Affirmative Action would do. Under Affirmative Action the black pilot would actually have to qualify at least to the standards of white pilots...if not a bit more, because "White Privilege" is actually a thing, and particularly was when that black male pilot started his journey.

DEI would do more and differently for a more specific outcome. DEI would require standards to be "adjusted" to make sure of a positive outcome.
I think a lot of people use the terms to mean the same thing. There's some grey areas there so I can understand that. I'm sure I've used one term when the other would be more applicable.

Having said that, as per the article I just posted, the airlines don't drop standards for minorities so that more of them can get on board. That's not to say that they don't drop standards at all. They did after covid because there was a limited number of pilots available. So maybe the minimum number of hours required to get to First Officer was dropped. But it wasn't dropped for black guys and maintained for white ones.

And again, I keep emphasising this, Kirk wasn't stupid. He knew that.
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,630
20,921
Orlando, Florida
✟1,529,665.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
In other news. Steven Bonnell, a/k/a Destiny, has been banned from Twitch. Hasan Piker needs to be next. He and Destiny have been calling for violence against conservatives for years. Freedom of speech does not include calls for violence.

I've followed Destiny and never heard him advocate for political violence against conservative people.

Despite the blunt tone Destiny used, I think it's generally true that having Trump in office has indirectly promoted the kinds of political violence we have seen in the past decade. Trump promotes extremist ideas and extremist individuals around him, so it's not surprising that more people feel the symbolic weight of that, a kind of changing of norms that doesn't just change the overton window, it erodes faith in the dependability of institutions.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Chesterton

Whats So Funny bout Peace Love and Understanding
Site Supporter
May 24, 2008
26,720
21,656
Flatland
✟1,109,520.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
In which case then white guys are obviously better flyers than women or Asians or blacks because they are over represented. Which is quite frankly...nonsense.
Why is that nonsense?
There are obviously reasons why women, Asians, Latinos, Blacks etc aren't taking flying lessons in the first place.
What are the reasons?
Now, some people will argue that “I want the best pilots, regardless of the color of their skin.” I hear you, and I completely agree. What that misses is that these academies aren’t hiring pilots, they’re accepting people who want to train to become pilots.
Doesn't every pilot training academy accept people who want to become pilots? Doesn't every technical school accept everyone who wants to become electricians or mechanics?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
23,604
16,172
72
Bondi
✟382,256.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Why is that nonsense?
Is that a serious question? Why would your average white guy be a better flyer than your average black guy? What does your ethnic background have to do with your ability to land a plane?
What are the reasons?
I'd guess that money would be a factor. Some key facts from here: Black Americans Earn 30% Less Than White Americans, While Black Households Have Just One-Eighth Wealth Of White Households

Black workers in the U.S. earn on average, 30%, or $10,000, less than white workers, McKinsey found.

Nearly half of Black workers are employed in the healthcare, retail, accommodation and food service industries with the “vast majority” in lower-paying service roles instead of professional or managerial roles.

The annual median wage of all U.S. workers is about $42,000, 43% of Black workers earn less than $30,000 per year, highlighting how they are overrepresented in low-paying jobs.

While Black Americans are underrepresented in high-paying professions; only 5% of physicians are Black, and just 4.5% of software developers are Black.

Black entrepreneurs, on average, launch their businesses with $35,000 in startup capital and loans, versus an average of $107,000 for White entrepreneurs.

The median Black household has a net worth of about $24,000, or about one-eighth the figure of $188,000 for white households.
Doesn't every pilot training academy accept people who want to become pilots? Doesn't every technical school accept everyone who wants to become electricians or mechanics?
If they can afford it, for sure. Black pilots are significantly under represented. We can bounce a few posts back and forth debating why that is so, but the fact is undeniable.

And why it is so is also irrelevant to the case in point. Which is Kirk's comments, insinuating that standards were lowered for minorities. Which we know is abject nonsense.
 
Upvote 0

BPPLEE

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
16,142
7,567
61
Montgomery
✟258,891.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
That's what Affirmative Action would do. Under Affirmative Action the black pilot would actually have to qualify at least to the standards of white pilots...if not a bit more, because "White Privilege" is actually a thing, and particularly was when that black male pilot started his journey.

DEI would do more and differently for a more specific outcome. DEI would require standards to be "adjusted" to make sure of a positive outcome. But DEI hasn't actually done much for blacks in general and not for black men in particular, so the odds that DEI gained his position are zero to none.

Statistics show that black people in general and black men in particular have been less benefited by DEI policies than any other group...less even than white men.
Im not disputing anything in your post I’m just curious how white men benefit from DEI? Are they LGBTQ white men ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

MrMoe

Part-Time Breatharian
Sep 13, 2011
6,406
3,819
Moe's Tavern
✟198,175.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
No surprise that those on the left are losing their minds now that the “cancel culture” pendulum is swinging in the right’s favor.

They’ve conveniently forgotten the phrase “Freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom from consequences”. Which used to be one of their favorite phrases to use whenever someone on the right got “cancelled”.
 

MrMoe

Part-Time Breatharian
Sep 13, 2011
6,406
3,819
Moe's Tavern
✟198,175.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
I've followed Destiny and never heard him advocate for political violence against conservative people.

A recent comment of his on Piers Morgan: “You need conservatives to be afraid of getting killed when they go to events…” Stochastic terrorism.
 
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
23,604
16,172
72
Bondi
✟382,256.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I've followed Destiny and never heard him advocate for political violence against conservative people.
He's a Jeckyll and Hyde character. I've seen him in discussions with people like Alex O'Connor when they discuss religion and philosophy. He comes across as forthright but reasonable. And then I've seen him in studio 'debates' in regard to politics, most recently in regard to Kirk, and quite frankly - he becomes...unhinged. I think that's the best way I can describe it.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: RDKirk
Upvote 0

Freth

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 11, 2020
1,707
2,055
Midwest, USA
✟587,880.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
I've followed Destiny and never heard him advocate for political violence against conservative people.

Despite the blunt tone Destiny used, I think it's generally true that having Trump in office has indirectly promoted the kinds of political violence we have seen in the past decade. Trump promotes extremist ideas and extremist individuals around him, so it's not surprising that more people feel the symbolic weight of that, a kind of changing of norms that doesn't just change the overton window, it erodes faith in the dependability of institutions.

I gave two examples in post #33 of this very thread.
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,630
20,921
Orlando, Florida
✟1,529,665.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Years
I gave two examples in post #33 of this very thread.

Destiny's Twitch ban doesn't seem to be related to anything in this discussion.

I researched this, and Destiny didn't urge political violence. He refused to express sufficient outrage at Charlie Kirk's death. Frankly, that's understandable. Refusing to participate in a heavily partisan-loaded liturgy of mourning meant to turn an assassinated figure into a martyr isn't the same as celebrating somebody's death. It's a distinction that requires appreciation of nuance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoldenBoy89
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,630
20,921
Orlando, Florida
✟1,529,665.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
A recent comment of his on Piers Morgan: “You need conservatives to be afraid of getting killed when they go to events…” Stochastic terrorism.

Not necessarily. It's a similar argument to what Ezra Klein recently made talking to Russ Douthat, that violence and extremism can be mimetic, going beyond left-right political boundaries. If one side deals in demonization and dehumanizing rhetoric, as conservatives have been, that has wider, systemic and cultural effects.
 
Upvote 0

wing2000

E pluribus unum
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2012
25,373
21,445
✟1,771,170.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The FCC attempting to shut it down would end up in court in a heartbeat and lose. That's not an issue. Your cite has the implication that this is an issue without evidence that it is.

The circumstantial timing of the events certainly supports my implication. One would have to be naive to believe otherwise. The FCC chair's public comments - “we can do this the easy or the hard way" and Trump's), support my implication. And yes, Kimmel could sue the government and likely win (once the evidence is provided in court). Disney/ABC could have sued as well....but of course they took the less costly path. After all, a corporation could care less about freedom of speech.

Agreed. This wasn't "cancel culture" in action. There was no huge outcry from conservatives demanding it. This was just a guy getting fired. But to Kimmel's credit, him getting himself fired is the first funny thing he's ever done.

One person has been whining about Kimmel (and other late night comedians) for years. That person was celebrating yesterday. There's no doubt Trump will use the power of the government to remove other critics now they he has removed a second comedian from the airways.
 
Upvote 0

RocksInMyHead

God is innocent; Noah built on a floodplain!
May 12, 2011
9,421
10,193
PA
✟439,552.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Destiny's Twitch ban doesn't seem to be related to anything in this discussion.
Yeah, that was a couple years ago iirc - he posted about it again in the wake of Kirk's assassination as ragebait/trolling.
 
Upvote 0

wing2000

E pluribus unum
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2012
25,373
21,445
✟1,771,170.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
No surprise that those on the left are losing their minds now that the “cancel culture” pendulum is swinging in the right’s favor.

Do you support the Executive Branch, via the FCC, controlling political speech on our airways? Imagine the reaction if President Obama had ordered FOX News to drop Sean Hannity....or else?
 
Upvote 0