Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That is YOU not understanding. You not being able to grasp scientific concepts is YOUR failing; no one else's.
A statement that nearly all biologists would agree with, and one that does absolutely nothing to support your rejection of macroevolution.
Just to be clear: you obviously know next to nothing about macroevolution, the evidence for it, and why the vast majority of scientists accept it. But you're still sure that it's a joke.
You still refuse to post an actual real world example.
I would ask you to post an actual example but your track record indicates you won't.
Seriously? You actually think scientific theories become absolute fact? FYI this sort of ignorance is why so many different people here have been practically begging you to go learn some basic science.
As long as you keep refusing to post any real world examples I see no reason to take anything you post seriously.
Make up your mind already? Do you want to be spoon fed the children's version or learn how scientists actually view evolution? I'll happily provide any number of technical papers if you want to see how scientists actually study evolution.
I saw a term that was new to me late last year that I can't help but think of when interacting with creationists: motivated ignorance.
Good grief, man. Post a link to a video if you want anyone to see it. No one in their right mind is going to click a random search link from someone else with embedded trackers.I have to say this video is a joke and very simplistic and if this is how bio chemists, biologists, paleontologists and evolutionist view evolution...
Earlier he was complaining that scientists don't dumb it all down and now he's complaining about the dumbed-down material?
Perhaps you don't know what "macroevolution" is. We have directly observed instances of macroevolution.
They lied to you about that...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
What was that animal scientists swore went extinct, until they* "discovered" it?
Didn't they make it sound like it was discovered through conventional evolution models, when in truth, the Inuit (?) Indians were talking about them all the time?
Even eating them for breakfast?
That's probably where they got that information.
From the Indians, not the laboratory.
*
Yes, that's what happened. Scientists predicted that tetrapods evolved in the Devonian, and therefore there should be transitional fish/tetrapod fossils in Devonian strata. Paleontologists went to see, and found numerous transitional species there.
Omiltemi cottontail rabbit Silvilagus insonus , for example. Lots of animals become so rare as to be missing over years, and are later discovered to still exist. Don't think any biologists swore about it, though. There's quite a list of such species. Would you like to learn about more of them?
