But, you must remember, the canon means nothing unless you’ve acquainted yourself with the Ethiopian, that is to say, Alexandrian, method of hermeneutics and their interpretation of these books, that is to say, what the Ethiopian Orthodox and Eritrean Orthodox think they actually mean .
The Ethiopians do not interpret 1 Enoch for example in a literal historical context, but as Christological prophecy based on Luke ch. 24 using the typological-allegorical approach favored by the catechtical school of Alexandria, for the Church of Ethiopia until the 20th century was part of the Coptic Orthodox Church of Alexandria and shares the same doctrine as the Coptic church, which by the way uses what is basically the Greek Orthodox canon, which has books the Ethiopians lack (the Ethiopian canon is not a superset of the other canons, contrary to popular belief) and lacks books like 1 Enoch, Jubilees that the Ethiopians have, but the two churches have never had an issue about this nor has it come up in internal Oriental Orthodox dialogues nor in OO-EO dialogue nor in OO-RC dialogue.
By the way the martyred Emperor Haile Selassie is responsible for convening the Council of Addis Ababa, which brought together the heads of the Ethiopian, Armenian, Syriac, Indian and Coptic churches and resulted in them adopting the name Oriental Orthodox so as to identify themselves in an ecumenical context. Like the Armenians, Romanians, Bulgarians, North Macedonians, Serbians, Montenegrins, Moldovans, Russians, Hungarians, Ukrainians, Croatians and Slovenians, the Ethiopians are among those Christian nations to have suffered both at the hands of Muslims and Communists.