• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The 666 mark will be a tattoo

rockytopva

Love to pray! :)
Site Supporter
Mar 6, 2011
20,678
8,043
.
Visit site
✟1,244,469.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
I had a friend ask if I traded in bitcoin. My reply was that I believe that an Elon Musk figure will be the Beast of Revelation, Bitcoin will be the currency, and the mark will be the credit card...

16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six. - Revelations 13

In the near future there will be no need for credit cards or personal id. There will be a mark on the hand or forehead that people will scan. This will be the way to do business. It will just be another tattoo for many. One will be able to travel without personal identification like drivers licenses, credit cards, or passports. The ID will include the numbers 666. All you will need to do is swipe your ID and you will be good to go... But scripture says...

9 And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand,
10 The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb: - Revelation 14

The reason why this will be a scanable tattoo is because it will be placed on the hand or forehead... A place where no hair grows to interfere with the scan.

Mark6.jpg
 

d taylor

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2018
13,666
5,766
60
Mississippi
✟319,502.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
I had a friend ask if I traded in bitcoin. My reply was that I believe that an Elon Musk figure will be the Beast of Revelation, Bitcoin will be the currency, and the mark will be the credit card...

16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six. - Revelations 13

In the near future there will be no need for credit cards or personal id. There will be a mark on the hand or forehead that people will scan. This will be the way to do business. It will just be another tattoo for many. One will be able to travel without personal identification like drivers licenses, credit cards, or passports. The ID will include the numbers 666. All you will need to do is swipe your ID and you will be good to go... But scripture says...

9 And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand,
10 The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb: - Revelation 14

The reason why this will be a scanable tattoo is because it will be placed on the hand or forehead... A place where no hair grows to interfere with the scan.

View attachment 367573
-
Which beast of Revelation..
 
Upvote 0

rockytopva

Love to pray! :)
Site Supporter
Mar 6, 2011
20,678
8,043
.
Visit site
✟1,244,469.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
-
Which beast of Revelation..
1 And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.

2 And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.

3 And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.

4 And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?

5 And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months.

6 And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven. - Revelation 13
 
Upvote 0

rockytopva

Love to pray! :)
Site Supporter
Mar 6, 2011
20,678
8,043
.
Visit site
✟1,244,469.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
People have got to warned over this...

16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six. - Revelation 13
 
Upvote 0

rockytopva

Love to pray! :)
Site Supporter
Mar 6, 2011
20,678
8,043
.
Visit site
✟1,244,469.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
As far as prophecies I believe that Isaac Newton was closest... And to fully quote the guy...

And I heard the man clothed in linen, which was upon the waters of the river, when he held up his right hand and his left hand unto heaven, and sware by him that liveth for ever that it shall be for a time, times, and an half. -Daniel 12:7

From a folio cataloged as Yahuda MS 7.3g, f. 13v:

"So then the time times & half a time are 42 months or 1260 days or three years & an half, reckoning twelve months to a year & 30 days to a month as was done in the Calendar of the primitive year. And the days of short lived Beasts being put for the years of lived kingdoms, the period of 1260 days, if dated from the complete conquest of the three kings A.C. 800, will end A.C. 2060." - Isaac Newton

As Charlemagne was crowned king on December 25, 800 by Pope Leo the III so the day of Christ's coming may be on Christmas Day, 2060. If the rapture of the saints (1 Thessalonians 4:16-17) occurs seven years before the time of Christ's coming the date of the rapture 12.25 2053. However Isaac Newton notes...

"It may end later, but I see no reason for its ending sooner. This I mention not to assert when the time of the end shall be, but to put a stop to the rash conjectures of fancifull men who are frequently predicting the time of the end, & by doing so bring the sacred prophesies into discredit as often as their predictions fail. Christ comes as a thief in the night, & it is not for us to know the times & seasons which God hath put into his own breast." - Isaac Newton

6 When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?
7 And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power.
8 But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth. - Acts 1

I describe myself as someone who knows not... But believes Isaac Newton was the closest. And if ever asked to have any kind of mark on my body to heartedly refuse.
 
Upvote 0

rockytopva

Love to pray! :)
Site Supporter
Mar 6, 2011
20,678
8,043
.
Visit site
✟1,244,469.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
Identification- Think about the ease of having something swipable on your body...

1. Gas - Just use the reader to swipe your ID
2. Groceries- Just use the reader to swipe your ID
3. Flight tickets - Just use the reader to swipe your ID
4. Cruises - Just use the reader to swipe your ID
5. Passports - Just use the reader to swipe your ID
6. Long trips - No need for a billfold or paperwork
7. Vehicles- No need for keys.

How easy it would be to travel!
 
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
39,455
28,913
Pacific Northwest
✟810,182.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
The Beast - Will it be robotic?

Nero. It was most likely Nero.

Though I suppose Robo-Nero could make for a weird campy sci-fi movies. Too bad the era of campy 80's movies died with the 80's.

Also, nothing to do with tattoos, bar codes, or computers, or anything of that nature. John expected his readers to be able to understand what he was writing. If our position is that the original first century readership couldn't understand it, then we are reading it wrong.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0

Dave Watchman

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2014
1,465
607
✟80,713.00
Faith
Christian
From a folio cataloged as Yahuda MS 7.3g, f. 13v:

"So then the time times & half a time are 42 months or 1260 days or three years & an half, reckoning twelve months to a year & 30 days to a month as was done in the Calendar of the primitive year. And the days of short lived Beasts being put for the years of lived kingdoms, the period of 1260 days, if dated from the complete conquest of the three kings A.C. 800, will end A.C. 2060." - Isaac Newton

As Charlemagne was crowned king on December 25, 800 by Pope Leo the III so the day of Christ's coming may be on Christmas Day, 2060. If the rapture of the saints (1 Thessalonians 4:16-17) occurs seven years before the time of Christ's coming the date of the rapture 12.25 2053. However Isaac Newton notes...

"It may end later, but I see no reason for its ending sooner. This I mention not to assert when the time of the end shall be, but to put a stop to the rash conjectures of fancifull men who are frequently predicting the time of the end, & by doing so bring the sacred prophesies into discredit as often as their predictions fail. Christ comes as a thief in the night, & it is not for us to know the times & seasons which God hath put into his own breast." - Isaac Newton

Portrait-of-A-S-Yahuda-R.jpeg


I remember you always post this 2060 deal Rocky. And Abraham Shalom Yahuda was the man. So was John Maynard Keynes. Remember Keynesian economics? Both of those men were together in England biding at auction for Isaac Newton's writings. Abraham Yahuda wanted to bring Newton's materials on religion back to Jerusalem to put in a museum. He did win the ones he was after, but he didn't live to see them make it to Jerusalem as they we're tied up in the courts until 1969. Newton would have known to be looking for 1969. 1969 was rock and roll time. The Spirit in the Sky was here making Secretariat, as the Bad Moon was on the rise. It was a Secret.

Newton's Note on 2060 was a hoax, fake news. He said it right in there: "This I mention not to assert when the time of the end shall be, but to put a stop to the rash conjectures of fancifull men who are frequently predicting the time of the end, & by doing so bring the sacred prophesies into discredit as often as their predictions fail. Christ comes as a thief in the night, & it is not for us to know the times & seasons which God hath put into his own breast." - Isaac Newton

He wasn't really saying when the time of the end would be, he put that there to throw people off when the time of the end would really be. Newton was worried, especially with it coming from someone of his prominence, that it might even violate Christ coming as a thief in the night. It's not for us to know the times and seasons. And it's still functioning to this very day. Because what Newton wrote in this little blurb, this short publicity note, was a publicity stunt designed to take people's attention away from what he really suspected the timing to be. This 2060 deal disagrees with what he wrote in his Daniel 9 commentary. Newton would have known to be watching for 1969.

So if that timing is correct, it means that a bunch of things, like your Mark of the Beast deal, has to already have just happened, and is happening now. Price action makes for market commentary. Here is where we trade the charts, do not trade a story. There's too many stories out there. Like how the pilot trusts, and flies by his instrumentation, when poor visibility precludes the use of GFR. We see through the glass dimly.

Our technical analysis, our charts and instrumentation as Bible People, are in those prophetic time periods found in Daniel and Revelation. If we can figure out we where are in those time periods, the Antichrist, and the Mark of the Beast, among other things, has to be happening now.

Cool video, spooky video, of where I think we are now.

 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Jipsah

Blood Drinker
Aug 17, 2005
13,774
4,456
71
Franklin, Tennessee
✟283,404.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
In the near future there will be no need for credit cards or personal id. There will be a mark on the hand or forehead that people will scan.
Nah, if you were gonna do that you'd use a chip.

Anyway, the Revelator was telling his contremporaries what was gonna happen to them.
 
Upvote 0

rockytopva

Love to pray! :)
Site Supporter
Mar 6, 2011
20,678
8,043
.
Visit site
✟1,244,469.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
"My reply was that I believe that an Elon Musk figure will be the Beast of Revelation, Bitcoin will be the currency, and the mark will be the credit card..."

... and all the world wondered after the beast. - Revelation 13:3

An Elon Musk type figure... Not necessarily Elon Musk. It will be a figure to cause the world to wonder after. As far as the promotion of Bitcoin... Elon Musk calls the U.S. dollar ‘hopeless,’ says his America Party will embrace Bitcoin - Elon Musk calls the U.S. dollar 'hopeless,' says his America Party will embrace Bitcoin
 
Upvote 0

rockytopva

Love to pray! :)
Site Supporter
Mar 6, 2011
20,678
8,043
.
Visit site
✟1,244,469.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
I do believe an Elon Musk type figure will figure it out...

* Create a new currency
* Create something "swipable" to access the account
* Eliminate the need to carry a billfold, credit cards, passports, drivers licensees, and those sort of things.

Every time I have heard Elon Musk get up to lecture he starts out by promoting bitcoin.
 
Upvote 0

rockytopva

Love to pray! :)
Site Supporter
Mar 6, 2011
20,678
8,043
.
Visit site
✟1,244,469.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Critically Copernican
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
24,619
11,483
Space Mountain!
✟1,357,559.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Nero. It was most likely Nero.

Though I suppose Robo-Nero could make for a weird campy sci-fi movies. Too bad the era of campy 80's movies died with the 80's.

Also, nothing to do with tattoos, bar codes, or computers, or anything of that nature. John expected his readers to be able to understand what he was writing. If our position is that the original first century readership couldn't understand it, then we are reading it wrong.

-CryptoLutheran

That's not altogether a sound conclusion, and I wouldn't put too much money on the "Neronian" interpretation.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

rockytopva

Love to pray! :)
Site Supporter
Mar 6, 2011
20,678
8,043
.
Visit site
✟1,244,469.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
I think we should all be allowed to read Revelation and come up with an interpretation. And others should be allowed to contest such a view. I do believe they will come up with a way to travel without personal ID, cash, or credit card.I would be careful on how I handled such changes when they come.
 
Upvote 0

Dave Watchman

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2014
1,465
607
✟80,713.00
Faith
Christian
I do believe an Elon Musk type figure will figure it out...

* Create a new currency
* Create something "swipable" to access the account
* Eliminate the need to carry a billfold, credit cards, passports, drivers licensees, and those sort of things.

Every time I have heard Elon Musk get up to lecture he starts out by promoting bitcoin.

The trouble with this is it's too much stuff to get done. If the 2060 Newton blurb was true there might be enough time. Even if the 2040 guy was right. But not even the 2030 people. There's not enough time, or chips, to get all the infrastructure going.

"He causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads,​

Think about all the poor people in the third world nations. Think about those images of the starving people in Gaza holding out empty containers, hoping for someone to scoop some food into. Not even everyone has a phone.

When Jesus appears every single person living on earth needs to be either sealed with the seal of the living God, or they have the mark of the beast. Because when He appears we will be like Him. This all really amounts to the judgement of the living, the people alive just before Christ arrives.
So if that timing is correct, it means that a bunch of things, like your Mark of the Beast deal, has to already have just happened, and is happening now.
It's amazing how busy the other thread got. Those guys are funny. Gottservant did a line where he asked: "how does a tattoo come to "create a painful sore" (as it says in Revelation the "mark" will do)?

This is a really big clue, that can turn into a major piece of the puzzle proving what the mark of the beast is, by eliminating what it is not, when we can pin the 5 months of Revelation 9. Then we can do the Art Doyle deal. "Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.” Then we can know that these things already just happened, but were overlooked by the majority of people.

Even this part:

"that the image of the beast should both speak and cause as many as would not worship the image of the beast to be killed.​

I'm pretty sure even this has just happened, and had been happening since the late 60's, and pretty much came to it's conclusion now. It's one of those unspeakable things people don't want to hear about. I can pin it to a specific event, on an exact day of the week. Even agnostics on a news forum were asking: "why is this happening now"? I'm only mentioning this, not to write a reckless note, but so people aren't worried about the fear of an uncertain future event. Some people think agents working for the throne of the beast will be driving around with portable guillotine trailers. If all of the Hal Lindsey style end time interpretation of events were to come true, like Newton's worry about predicting the timing of the end times, it might even prevent Christ's coming as a thief. If everyone was lined up waiting to get a chip in the right hand, or get their head cut off, then everyone would know that we were in one of the Days of the Son of Man. It's not happening like that.

I'm pretty sure it has to be happening now.

Peaceful Sabbath.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
39,455
28,913
Pacific Northwest
✟810,182.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
That's not altogether a sound conclusion, and I wouldn't put too much money on the "Neronian" interpretation.

The relevant text is this:

"This calls for wisdom: let the one who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and his number is 666." - Revelation 13:18

That is an invitation to the reader to discern a name based on the numerical value of 666 (six hundred and sixty-six).

A central exegetical principle requires we examine a text to understand to whom a text is addressed. In the case of the Revelation we have an answer:

"John to the seven churches that are in Asia" - Revelation 1:4

The seven churches to whom the Revelation was written are mentioned in chapters 2-3. It seems entirely sound to assume that John intended his readership to be able to discern the meaning--to discern who the person is being described in Revelation 13 even though he is written in bombastic, graphic, apocalyptic imagery as a beast rising out of the sea.

I will freely admit that one probably shouldn't hold to a Neronian interpretation as though it were dogma; but the general principle of exegesis here, that the original readership would be able to discern who is being spoken about, holds true even if it isn't a reference to Nero. I think Nero makes the most sense given the information John supplies us with. Though I also think the reference to Nero is ultimately about Roman imperial power in the late first century broadly, rather than Nero individually (Nero had been dead for decades already when John wrote the Apocalypse). But I think a clue here is in describing the beast as having suffered a mortal wound, and then being restored to life; take this with the late first century idea of the Nero Redivivus myth (the idea which many held that Nero would return), I think John is pointing to a "revival" of Nero beginning under Domitian (or possibly Trajan, if we postpone the dating of the Revelation by a few more years). That is to say, Nero represented Roman imperial power manifest as persecuting, oppressive, and tyrannical; and I think that is part of the point John is getting at. Am I subscribing to this as dogma? Well no. But I think as a theory it makes more sense than theories which ignore basic exegetical principles.

The alternative is assuming that nobody could understand what John wrote until thousands of years later. And wouldn't it be kind of arrogant of us moderns to assume we can understand what earlier generations of Christians could not? In which case, why address this to his contemporaries in Asia? I generally dislike that we are willing to disregard the most basic principles of good biblical hermeneutics and exegesis when it comes to the Revelation; as though we should respect the rest of the Bible by considering context and applying good exegesis, but when it comes to the Revelation we throw that all out of the window and enter into wild speculation mode like talking about microchips, one world governments, and playing pin the tail on the Antichrist with every famous person that has ever been born.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Critically Copernican
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
24,619
11,483
Space Mountain!
✟1,357,559.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The relevant text is this:

"This calls for wisdom: let the one who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and his number is 666." - Revelation 13:18

That is an invitation to the reader to discern a name based on the numerical value of 666 (six hundred and sixty-six).

A central exegetical principle requires we examine a text to understand to whom a text is addressed. In the case of the Revelation we have an answer:

"John to the seven churches that are in Asia" - Revelation 1:4

The seven churches to whom the Revelation was written are mentioned in chapters 2-3. It seems entirely sound to assume that John intended his readership to be able to discern the meaning--to discern who the person is being described in Revelation 13 even though he is written in bombastic, graphic, apocalyptic imagery as a beast rising out of the sea.

I will freely admit that one probably shouldn't hold to a Neronian interpretation as though it were dogma; but the general principle of exegesis here, that the original readership would be able to discern who is being spoken about, holds true even if it isn't a reference to Nero. I think Nero makes the most sense given the information John supplies us with. Though I also think the reference to Nero is ultimately about Roman imperial power in the late first century broadly, rather than Nero individually (Nero had been dead for decades already when John wrote the Apocalypse). But I think a clue here is in describing the beast as having suffered a mortal wound, and then being restored to life; take this with the late first century idea of the Nero Redivivus myth (the idea which many held that Nero would return), I think John is pointing to a "revival" of Nero beginning under Domitian (or possibly Trajan, if we postpone the dating of the Revelation by a few more years). That is to say, Nero represented Roman imperial power manifest as persecuting, oppressive, and tyrannical; and I think that is part of the point John is getting at. Am I subscribing to this as dogma? Well no. But I think as a theory it makes more sense than theories which ignore basic exegetical principles.

The alternative is assuming that nobody could understand what John wrote until thousands of years later. And wouldn't it be kind of arrogant of us moderns to assume we can understand what earlier generations of Christians could not? In which case, why address this to his contemporaries in Asia? I generally dislike that we are willing to disregard the most basic principles of good biblical hermeneutics and exegesis when it comes to the Revelation; as though we should respect the rest of the Bible by considering context and applying good exegesis, but when it comes to the Revelation we throw that all out of the window and enter into wild speculation mode like talking about microchips, one world governments, and playing pin the tail on the Antichrist with every famous person that has ever been born.

-CryptoLutheran
The relevant text is this:

"This calls for wisdom: let the one who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and his number is 666." - Revelation 13:18

That is an invitation to the reader to discern a name based on the numerical value of 666 (six hundred and sixty-six).

A central exegetical principle requires we examine a text to understand to whom a text is addressed. In the case of the Revelation we have an answer:

"John to the seven churches that are in Asia" - Revelation 1:4

The seven churches to whom the Revelation was written are mentioned in chapters 2-3. It seems entirely sound to assume that John intended his readership to be able to discern the meaning--to discern who the person is being described in Revelation 13 even though he is written in bombastic, graphic, apocalyptic imagery as a beast rising out of the sea.

I will freely admit that one probably shouldn't hold to a Neronian interpretation as though it were dogma; but the general principle of exegesis here, that the original readership would be able to discern who is being spoken about, holds true even if it isn't a reference to Nero. I think Nero makes the most sense given the information John supplies us with. Though I also think the reference to Nero is ultimately about Roman imperial power in the late first century broadly, rather than Nero individually (Nero had been dead for decades already when John wrote the Apocalypse). But I think a clue here is in describing the beast as having suffered a mortal wound, and then being restored to life; take this with the late first century idea of the Nero Redivivus myth (the idea which many held that Nero would return), I think John is pointing to a "revival" of Nero beginning under Domitian (or possibly Trajan, if we postpone the dating of the Revelation by a few more years). That is to say, Nero represented Roman imperial power manifest as persecuting, oppressive, and tyrannical; and I think that is part of the point John is getting at. Am I subscribing to this as dogma? Well no. But I think as a theory it makes more sense than theories which ignore basic exegetical principles.

The alternative is assuming that nobody could understand what John wrote until thousands of years later. And wouldn't it be kind of arrogant of us moderns to assume we can understand what earlier generations of Christians could not? In which case, why address this to his contemporaries in Asia? I generally dislike that we are willing to disregard the most basic principles of good biblical hermeneutics and exegesis when it comes to the Revelation; as though we should respect the rest of the Bible by considering context and applying good exegesis, but when it comes to the Revelation we throw that all out of the window and enter into wild speculation mode like talking about microchips, one world governments, and playing pin the tail on the Antichrist with every famous person that has ever been born.

-CryptoLutheran

You're implying that I must be "ignoring basic exegetical principles." I realize that even after several years, you don't know me, and I can't really expect you to know which exegetical principles I employ to interpret the bible and its apocalyptic books and traditions. As the case may be, I find it's usually best not to assume that your interlocutor knows nothing.

Additionally, I'm not going to argue the interpretive issues here with you because I don't hold my view dogmatically either. Just take it as a point of further consideration that I'm giving you an additional hermeneutical tip which you may also want to consider for the long haul of life.

-2PhiloVoid
 
Upvote 0