• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Anyone have good arguments against Calvinism.

Maria Billingsley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2018
11,081
9,133
65
Martinez
✟1,133,625.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Taking a step back from that way of thinking and am looking for different ways of looking at it.
Might be best to point to a scriptural reference and give the Augustinian/ Calvanist view point first so a counterpoint can be given to kick off an argument.
Blessings
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Mark Quayle
Upvote 0

Gregory Thompson

Change is inevitable, feel free to spare some.
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2009
30,149
8,495
Canada
✟878,471.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Free will and Determinism is a false dichotomy. Try freeing yourself from needing to think in this false dichotomy of Calvinism vs Arminianism. Prior to the reformation, this idea didn't exist.
 
Upvote 0

chevyontheriver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2015
22,632
19,660
Flyoverland
✟1,325,580.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
Taking a step back from that way of thinking and am looking for different ways of looking at it.
Calvin might be an Augustinian of sorts but Augustine wouldn't have been a Calvinist.
 
Upvote 0

PloverWing

Episcopalian
May 5, 2012
5,112
6,086
New Jersey
✟401,836.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Taking a step back from that way of thinking and am looking for different ways of looking at it.

One approach is to read books and experience worship in some different, non-Calvinist Christian traditions. If you're looking for worship that's more liturgical and sacramental, visit a church in one of the liturgical traditions (Catholic, Orthodox, Lutheran, or Episcopal/Anglican). If you're looking for theology that emphasizes human cooperation with God's grace, you might read some Catholic theologians. If you're looking for an approach to Christianity that emphasizes quiet meditation and simplicity of life, consider the Quakers (or, alternatively, some of the Catholic mystics). And there are other branches of Christianity as well.

Is there some particular aspect of Calvinism that you're questioning, or are you looking for an alternative to the whole framework?
 
Upvote 0

d taylor

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2018
13,533
5,736
60
Mississippi
✟317,565.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Taking a step back from that way of thinking and am looking for different ways of looking at it.
-
This website is defiantly the place to go if you want to find teachings that can help you compare and see Calvinism faults and bad teaching.

Grace Evangelical Society

Here is just few of the many free articles they have on their website and youtube site.

https://faithalone.org/blog/calvinism-has-a-box-of-mystery-verses/
-------------------------
https://faithalone.org/blog/why-am-i-a-zero-point-calvinist/
-------------------------
https://faithalone.org/blog/bible-study-fellowship-romans-and-calvinism/
-------------------------
https://faithalone.org/grace-in-focus-articles/taking-romans-828-30-back-from-calvinism/
 
Upvote 0

Hoping2

Well-Known Member
Aug 15, 2024
1,330
344
71
Phoenix
✟46,009.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Free will and Determinism is a false dichotomy.
You are implying then, that there is no difference between the 2 POVs ?
Try freeing yourself from needing to think in this false dichotomy of Calvinism vs Arminianism. Prior to the reformation, this idea didn't exist.
I believe I was given the choice of whether to serve sin, or serve God.
Calvinism removes that choice.
 
Upvote 0

Fervent

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2020
6,394
2,760
45
San jacinto
✟201,461.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Calvin might be an Augustinian of sorts but Augustine wouldn't have been a Calvinist.
While true, there is a direct line from Augustine to Calvin since the lynchpin of Calvinist doctrine is Total Depravity which is essentially Original Sin taken to a logical extreme.
 
Upvote 0

chevyontheriver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2015
22,632
19,660
Flyoverland
✟1,325,580.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
While true, there is a direct line from Augustine to Calvin since the lynchpin of Calvinist doctrine is Total Depravity which is essentially Original Sin taken to a logical extreme.
I can agree that Calvinism 'evolved' out of Augustinianism by cumulative small mutations.
 
Upvote 0

Fervent

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2020
6,394
2,760
45
San jacinto
✟201,461.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I can agree that Calvinism 'evolved' out of Augustinianism by cumulative small mutations.
I'd say it was from a giant leap in Luther's Bondage of the Will. I certainly don't blame Augustine for the monstrosity, but I'd say there's an undeniable heritage. Though it is one of taking it to an extreme, partly because Augustine's polemics against Pelagius.

Altogether, I think a lot of the spilled ink is because the choice was between Pelagius' (alleged) self-directed salvation and Augustine's immobility rather than the moderate road that John Cassian walked in pointing out that God initiates and man responds, with man's role being passive but not irrelevant.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,506
52,486
Guam
✟5,124,106.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Taking a step back from that way of thinking and am looking for different ways of looking at it.

Romans 10:13 For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
 
Upvote 0

d taylor

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2018
13,533
5,736
60
Mississippi
✟317,565.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Romans 10:13 For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
-
Romes 10 is for the saving of people who are already believers and not the saving of unbelievers. Who are told to believe in Jesus, not to call on the name of the Lord.
 
Upvote 0

chevyontheriver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2015
22,632
19,660
Flyoverland
✟1,325,580.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
I'd say it was from a giant leap in Luther's Bondage of the Will. I certainly don't blame Augustine for the monstrosity, but I'd say there's an undeniable heritage. Though it is one of taking it to an extreme, partly because Augustine's polemics against Pelagius.
I think I was wrong to say 'small mutations'. That was the biologist in me I suppose. But more like 'punctuated equilibrium' fits the bill.
Altogether, I think a lot of the spilled ink is because the choice was between Pelagius' (alleged) self-directed salvation and Augustine's immobility rather than the moderate road that John Cassian walked in pointing out that God initiates and man responds, with man's role being passive but not irrelevant.
Cassian is under-rated.

Pelagius was wrong, as any Catholic should admit, but I haven't found double predestination popping up in Augustine. Nor necessary to be a completed Augustinian.

By the way, Jimmy Akin, apologist with Catholic Answers, wrote an article on Five Point Calvinism called 'A Tiptoe Through TULIP' wherein he said a Catholic could be a 3.5 point TULIP guy.
 
Upvote 0

Fervent

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2020
6,394
2,760
45
San jacinto
✟201,461.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I think I was wrong to say 'small mutations'. That was the biologist in me I suppose. But more like 'punctuated equilibrium' fits the bill.
Fair enough
Cassian is under-rated.
I agree
Pelagius was wrong, as any Catholic should admit, but I haven't found double predestination popping up in Augustine. Nor necessary to be a completed Augustinian.
The thing about Pelagius is whether or not he actually taught what he was accused of teaching is questionable, as in every case he defended himself he was found orthodox. It was only when Augustine and his companions represented him that they were able to secure a conviction. So while the teachings that were condemned are certainly condemnable, it isn't necessarily what Pelagius taught. As for double predestination and Augustine's teachings, I'd say you're correct there with the caveat that Augustine's ideas about the captivity/destruction of the imago dei isn't a major stretch towards Total Depravity rendering all of the rest of the TULIP logically necessary for anyone to achieve salvation. Whether Augustine believed as much or was simply engaging in polemic rhetoric is an open question, and I tend to think that he was engaging in such rhetoric given his rather..aggressive...personality.
By the way, Jimmy Akin, apologist with Catholic Answers, wrote an article on Five Point Calvinism called 'A Tiptoe Through TULIP' wherein he said a Catholic could be a 3.5 point TULIP guy.
That's interesting, and it's not as if the Catholics haven't had their own battle with the theology in the Jansenists.
 
Upvote 0

Gregory Thompson

Change is inevitable, feel free to spare some.
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2009
30,149
8,495
Canada
✟878,471.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
You are implying then, that there is no difference between the 2 POVs ?

I believe I was given the choice of whether to serve sin, or serve God.
Calvinism removes that choice.
The scripture talks about both, so pitting the two ideas against one another results in unnatural states.
 
Upvote 0

NBB

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 19, 2013
3,973
1,860
45
Uruguay
✟614,042.00
Country
Uruguay
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I considered calvinism, it tortured my mind so much that i had to stop the idea.

See this parable, they WERE INVITED, Calvinism would tell you that God is irresistible, but consider the guests here were invited, but refused making excuses, the poor the crippled were humble enough to accept.

The Parable of the Great Banquet​

15 When one of those at the table with him heard this, he said to Jesus, “Blessed is the one who will eat at the feast in the kingdom of God.”
16 Jesus replied: “A certain man was preparing a great banquet and invited many guests. 17 At the time of the banquet he sent his servant to tell those who had been invited, ‘Come, for everything is now ready.’
18 “But they all alike began to make excuses. The first said, ‘I have just bought a field, and I must go and see it. Please excuse me.’
19 “Another said, ‘I have just bought five yoke of oxen, and I’m on my way to try them out. Please excuse me.’
20 “Still another said, ‘I just got married, so I can’t come.’
21 “The servant came back and reported this to his master. Then the owner of the house became angry and ordered his servant, ‘Go out quickly into the streets and alleys of the town and bring in the poor, the crippled, the blind and the lame.’
22 “‘Sir,’ the servant said, ‘what you ordered has been done, but there is still room.’
23 “Then the master told his servant, ‘Go out to the roads and country lanes and compel them to come in, so that my house will be full. 24 I tell you, not one of those who were invited will get a taste of my banquet.’”
 
Upvote 0

Xeno.of.athens

I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of heaven.
May 18, 2022
7,281
2,303
Perth
✟197,542.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
-
Romes 10 is for the saving of people who are already believers and not the saving of unbelievers. Who are told to believe in Jesus, not to call on the name of the Lord.
I do not think I have heard that point of view before. Do you have sources?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,506
52,486
Guam
✟5,124,106.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Romes 10 is for the saving of people who are already believers and not the saving of unbelievers. Who are told to believe in Jesus, not to call on the name of the Lord.

2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
 
Upvote 0

d taylor

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2018
13,533
5,736
60
Mississippi
✟317,565.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
I do not think I have heard that point of view before. Do you have sources?
-
Just look at the very next verse and what it states.

How then shall they call on Him in whom they have not believed? And how shall they believe in Him of whom they have not heard? And how shall they hear without a preacher?

Paul writes how can a person call on Jesus if they have not believed. So in other words the order is

A person (preacher, etc..) explains how to become a believer (by belief in Jesus). The person believes, then the person who is now a believer. Can now call on the name of The lord (for help)

Romans 10: A Concise Commentary – Grace Evangelical Society
 
Upvote 0

d taylor

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2018
13,533
5,736
60
Mississippi
✟317,565.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
-

It is belief in Jesus that gives a person God's free gift of Eternal Life. If you do not believe me, maybe you will believe The Gospel of John.

Repentance is for avoiding a punishment from God and it is for believers and unbelievers.
 
Upvote 0