Taking a step back from that way of thinking and am looking for different ways of looking at it.
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Might be best to point to a scriptural reference and give the Augustinian/ Calvanist view point first so a counterpoint can be given to kick off an argument.Taking a step back from that way of thinking and am looking for different ways of looking at it.
Calvin might be an Augustinian of sorts but Augustine wouldn't have been a Calvinist.Taking a step back from that way of thinking and am looking for different ways of looking at it.
Taking a step back from that way of thinking and am looking for different ways of looking at it.
Taking a step back from that way of thinking and am looking for different ways of looking at it.
You are implying then, that there is no difference between the 2 POVs ?Free will and Determinism is a false dichotomy.
I believe I was given the choice of whether to serve sin, or serve God.Try freeing yourself from needing to think in this false dichotomy of Calvinism vs Arminianism. Prior to the reformation, this idea didn't exist.
While true, there is a direct line from Augustine to Calvin since the lynchpin of Calvinist doctrine is Total Depravity which is essentially Original Sin taken to a logical extreme.Calvin might be an Augustinian of sorts but Augustine wouldn't have been a Calvinist.
I can agree that Calvinism 'evolved' out of Augustinianism by cumulative small mutations.While true, there is a direct line from Augustine to Calvin since the lynchpin of Calvinist doctrine is Total Depravity which is essentially Original Sin taken to a logical extreme.
I'd say it was from a giant leap in Luther's Bondage of the Will. I certainly don't blame Augustine for the monstrosity, but I'd say there's an undeniable heritage. Though it is one of taking it to an extreme, partly because Augustine's polemics against Pelagius.I can agree that Calvinism 'evolved' out of Augustinianism by cumulative small mutations.
Taking a step back from that way of thinking and am looking for different ways of looking at it.
Romans 10:13 For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
I think I was wrong to say 'small mutations'. That was the biologist in me I suppose. But more like 'punctuated equilibrium' fits the bill.I'd say it was from a giant leap in Luther's Bondage of the Will. I certainly don't blame Augustine for the monstrosity, but I'd say there's an undeniable heritage. Though it is one of taking it to an extreme, partly because Augustine's polemics against Pelagius.
Cassian is under-rated.Altogether, I think a lot of the spilled ink is because the choice was between Pelagius' (alleged) self-directed salvation and Augustine's immobility rather than the moderate road that John Cassian walked in pointing out that God initiates and man responds, with man's role being passive but not irrelevant.
Fair enoughI think I was wrong to say 'small mutations'. That was the biologist in me I suppose. But more like 'punctuated equilibrium' fits the bill.
I agreeCassian is under-rated.
The thing about Pelagius is whether or not he actually taught what he was accused of teaching is questionable, as in every case he defended himself he was found orthodox. It was only when Augustine and his companions represented him that they were able to secure a conviction. So while the teachings that were condemned are certainly condemnable, it isn't necessarily what Pelagius taught. As for double predestination and Augustine's teachings, I'd say you're correct there with the caveat that Augustine's ideas about the captivity/destruction of the imago dei isn't a major stretch towards Total Depravity rendering all of the rest of the TULIP logically necessary for anyone to achieve salvation. Whether Augustine believed as much or was simply engaging in polemic rhetoric is an open question, and I tend to think that he was engaging in such rhetoric given his rather..aggressive...personality.Pelagius was wrong, as any Catholic should admit, but I haven't found double predestination popping up in Augustine. Nor necessary to be a completed Augustinian.
That's interesting, and it's not as if the Catholics haven't had their own battle with the theology in the Jansenists.By the way, Jimmy Akin, apologist with Catholic Answers, wrote an article on Five Point Calvinism called 'A Tiptoe Through TULIP' wherein he said a Catholic could be a 3.5 point TULIP guy.
The scripture talks about both, so pitting the two ideas against one another results in unnatural states.You are implying then, that there is no difference between the 2 POVs ?
I believe I was given the choice of whether to serve sin, or serve God.
Calvinism removes that choice.
I do not think I have heard that point of view before. Do you have sources?-Romes 10 is for the saving of people who are already believers and not the saving of unbelievers. Who are told to believe in Jesus, not to call on the name of the Lord.
Romes 10 is for the saving of people who are already believers and not the saving of unbelievers. Who are told to believe in Jesus, not to call on the name of the Lord.
I do not think I have heard that point of view before. Do you have sources?
2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.